Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR vs TRV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Reinsurance
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Reinsurance
Insurance - Property & Casualty
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR vs TRV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $201M | $14.17B | $33.67B | $12.98B | $64.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.64B | $17.15B | $19.93B | $11.49B | $48.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $2.03B | $4.40B | $3.09B | $6.29B |
| Gross Margin | 69.8% | 28.5% | 37.2% | 44.6% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 14.2% | 25.0% | 35.5% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 85.7x | 6.7x | 10.1x | 7.7x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $416M | $3.59B | $2.73B | $2.33B | $9.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $1.32B | $993M | $1.73B | $842M |
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR vs TRV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) | 100 | 4.1 | -95.9% |
| Everest Re Group, L… (EG) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 334.9 | +234.9% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 179.2 | +79.2% |
| The Travelers Compa… (TRV) | 100 | 279.4 | +179.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR vs TRV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 106.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
- 15.5% revenue growth vs EG's 1.4%
EG is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs TRV's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ACGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 324.0% 10Y total return vs TRV's 201.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02, yield 0.0%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02 vs SLQT's 1.96, lower leverage
RNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.26 vs TRV's 0.51
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.51
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs SLQT's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting)
- +21.9% vs SLQT's -57.6%
TRV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 1.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs EG's 1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.51 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs SLQT's 1.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs SLQT's 1.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs TRV's 1.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.9% vs SLQT's -57.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs EG's 3.3%, ROIC 15.4% vs 8.1% |
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR vs TRV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR vs TRV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RNR leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACGL leads 1 • SLQT leads 0 • EG leads 0 • TRV leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RNR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRV is the larger business by revenue, generating $48.8B annually — 29.7x SLQT's $1.6B. RNR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLQT's 4.5%. On growth, ACGL holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $17.1B | $19.9B | $11.5B | $48.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | $2.5B | $5.2B | $4.1B | $8.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | $2.0B | $4.4B | $3.1B | $6.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$62M | $2.9B | $6.1B | $4.2B | $7.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.8% | +28.5% | +37.2% | +44.6% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +14.2% | +25.0% | +35.5% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +11.9% | +22.1% | +26.9% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +16.7% | +30.7% | +36.7% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | -4.0% | +7.3% | -36.4% | +3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -114.5% | +2.3% | +39.0% | +100.9% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RNR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, RNR trades at a 94% valuation discount to SLQT's 85.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RNR offers better value at 0.18x vs TRV's 0.52x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $201M | $14.2B | $33.7B | $13.0B | $64.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $584M | $16.4B | $35.4B | $13.6B | $73.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 85.71x | 9.29x | 8.13x | 5.31x | 10.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.70x | 10.05x | 7.66x | 10.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.38x | 0.29x | 0.18x | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.57x | 7.95x | 6.85x | 3.38x | 8.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.82x | 1.69x | 1.02x | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 0.94x | 1.47x | 0.70x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.16x | 5.50x | 3.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACGL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRV delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLQT. ACGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLQT's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RNR scores 8/9 vs SLQT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +13.3% | +19.0% | +16.6% | +19.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +3.3% | +5.9% | +5.7% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +8.1% | +15.4% | +16.0% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +10.9% | +11.6% | +10.7% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.23x | 0.11x | 0.12x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $384M | $2.3B | $1.7B | $598M | $8.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $1.3B | $993M | $1.7B | $842M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $416M | $3.6B | $2.7B | $2.3B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.11x | 18.38x | 34.86x | 33.28x | 19.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ACGL and RNR and TRV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $387 for SLQT. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +21.9% total return vs SLQT's -57.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRV at 19.5% vs SLQT's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.8% | +5.7% | +0.7% | +10.6% | +5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.6% | +5.1% | +2.0% | +21.9% | +12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.7% | -2.3% | +30.7% | +45.7% | +70.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | +41.8% | +144.0% | +87.1% | +98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | +129.5% | +324.0% | +176.9% | +201.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.1% | -0.8% | +9.3% | +13.4% | +19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EG and RNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLQT's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EG currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs SLQT's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 0.36x | 0.02x | -0.03x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.80 | $368.29 | $103.39 | $318.20 | $313.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $302.44 | $82.45 | $231.17 | $249.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.7% | +95.5% | +91.4% | +94.5% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.7 | 58.9 | 46.3 | 46.9 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 310K | 1.9M | 303K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EG and TRV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLQT as "Hold", EG as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", RNR as "Hold", TRV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 250.9% upside for SLQT (target: $4) vs 0.7% for EG (target: $354). For income investors, EG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.30% vs RNR's 0.55%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $354.00 | $104.00 | $308.33 | $313.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 22 | 34 | 28 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% | +0.0% | +0.6% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $8.09 | $0.02 | $1.67 | $4.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.8% | +5.6% | +12.3% | +4.8% |
RNR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACGL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SLQT vs EG vs ACGL vs RNR vs TRV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR or TRV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SelectQuote, Inc.
(SLQT) is the stronger pick with 15. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Everest Re Group, Ltd. (EG). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR or TRV?
On trailing P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus SelectQuote, Inc. at 85. 7x. On forward P/E, Everest Re Group, Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. wins at 0. 26x versus The Travelers Companies, Inc. 's 0. 51x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR or TRV?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to -96. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACGL returned +324. 0% versus SLQT's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR or TRV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus SelectQuote, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning SLQT is approximately -6273% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 72% for SelectQuote, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR or TRV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SelectQuote, Inc.
(SLQT) is pulling ahead at 15. 5% versus 1. 4% for Everest Re Group, Ltd. (EG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SelectQuote, Inc. grew EPS 106. 7% year-over-year, compared to 3. 8% for Arch Capital Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR or TRV?
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 3. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNR leads at 31. 5% versus 4. 5% for SLQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRV leads at 44. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR or TRV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Travelers Companies, Inc. 's 0. 51x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Everest Re Group, Ltd. (EG) trades at 6. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for The Travelers Companies, Inc. — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLQT: 250. 9% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR or TRV?
In this comparison, EG (2.
3% yield), TRV (1. 4% yield), RNR (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SLQT, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SLQT or EG or ACGL or RNR or TRV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +176. 9% 10Y return). SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +176. 9%, SLQT: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLQT and EG and ACGL and RNR and TRV?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; EG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RNR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TRV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EG, RNR, TRV pay a dividend while SLQT, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.