Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SNBR vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
SNBR vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $69M | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-132K | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 59.0% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $354M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $86.81B |
SNBR vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sleep Number Corpor… (SNBR) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNBR vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, SNBR is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.51
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs SNBR's -87.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs SNBR's -99.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs SNBR's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs SNBR's 2.70 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs SNBR's -56.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs SNBR's -0.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs -0.0% |
SNBR vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNBR vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 526231.7x SNBR's $1M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNBR's -9.4%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$132,000 | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$21M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.0% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.4% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.2% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SNBR and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $69M | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $422M | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.53x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 49.07x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs SNBR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $353M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $354M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -780.16x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $271 for SNBR. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs SNBR's -56.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs SNBR's -49.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -64.7% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.8% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.6% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNBR's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SNBR's 21.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.70x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.94 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.7% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SNBR as "Hold" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 230.0% upside for SNBR (target: $10) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
SNBR vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNBR or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SNBR or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -97. 3% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus SNBR's -87. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SNBR or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Sleep Number Corporation's 2. 70β — meaning SNBR is approximately 79% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SNBR or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -99. 9% for Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -541. 1% for Sleep Number Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SNBR or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -9. 4% for Sleep Number Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -3. 3% for SNBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNBR leads at 59. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SNBR or AMZN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNBR: 230.
0% to $10. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SNBR or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SNBR or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). Sleep Number Corporation (SNBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, SNBR: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SNBR and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.