Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SNDX vs PRAX vs PTCT vs BEAM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SNDX vs PRAX vs PTCT vs BEAM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.81B | $9.63B | $5.35B | $3.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $-92K | $827M | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-243M | $-327M | $-187M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 98.0% | — | 49.7% | -64.2% |
| Operating Margin | -102.9% | — | -8.3% | -281.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $346M | $110K | $492M | $294M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $135M | $357M | $985M | $295M |
SNDX vs PRAX vs PTCT vs BEAM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Syndax Pharmaceutic… (SNDX) | 100 | 118.0 | +18.0% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 123.6 | +23.6% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNDX vs PRAX vs PTCT vs BEAM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.81
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, current ratio 4.40x
- Beta 0.81, current ratio 4.40x
- 6.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 2.4% margin vs SNDX's -112.0%
- +7.7% vs PTCT's +58.2%
PTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 7.3% 10Y total return vs SNDX's 43.4%
BEAM is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -4.6% ROA vs SNDX's -45.2%, ROIC -31.1% vs -54.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs SNDX's -112.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs BEAM's 2.14 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs PTCT's +58.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.6% ROA vs SNDX's -45.2%, ROIC -31.1% vs -54.2% |
SNDX vs PRAX vs PTCT vs BEAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SNDX vs PRAX vs PTCT vs BEAM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BEAM leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • SNDX leads 0 • PTCT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SNDX and PTCT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTCT and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $827M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. PTCT is the more profitable business, keeping -22.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNDX's -112.0%. On growth, SNDX holds the edge at +2.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | -$92,000 | $827M | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$218M | -$357M | -$37M | -$355M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$243M | -$327M | -$187M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$278M | -$283M | -$229M | -$384M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.0% | — | +49.7% | -64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -102.9% | — | -8.3% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -112.0% | — | -22.6% | -49.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -128.2% | — | -27.7% | -2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | — | -76.8% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +2.7% | -100.3% | +26.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BEAM leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $9.6B | $5.3B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $9.3B | $4.9B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.24x | -24.72x | 8.29x | -38.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 5.42x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.51x | — | 3.09x | 23.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.53x | 8.54x | — | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BEAM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEAM delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SNDX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNDX's 5.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs SNDX's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -43.0% | — | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.2% | -40.2% | -6.8% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -54.2% | -65.0% | — | -31.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.0% | -49.3% | +55.9% | -33.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.36x | 0.00x | — | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $212M | -$357M | -$492M | -$1M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $135M | $357M | $985M | $295M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $346M | $110,000 | $492M | $294M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.31x | — | -1.67x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $16,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,444 for BEAM. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs PTCT's +58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs BEAM's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.6% | +16.4% | -16.0% | +16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +105.6% | +775.0% | +58.2% | +93.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | +1976.5% | +16.1% | -5.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.1% | -20.8% | +60.3% | -55.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.4% | -20.1% | +733.2% | +67.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | +174.9% | +5.1% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNDX and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNDX is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEAM's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs PTCT's 73.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.55x | 1.13x | 2.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.58 | $356.00 | $87.50 | $36.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.58 | $35.18 | $37.94 | $15.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.3% | +93.6% | +73.7% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 55.6 | 45.3 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 378K | 1.0M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNDX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 94.7% upside for SNDX (target: $40) vs 29.7% for BEAM (target: $41).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $544.40 | $89.67 | $40.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 16 | 26 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BEAM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SNDX vs PRAX vs PTCT vs BEAM: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNDX or PRAX or PTCT or BEAM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is the stronger pick with 627. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 8. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SNDX) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SNDX or PRAX or PTCT or BEAM?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +60. 3%, compared to -55. 6% for Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +733. 2% versus PRAX's -20. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SNDX or PRAX or PTCT or BEAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Beam Therapeutics Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning BEAM is approximately 165% more volatile than SNDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SNDX or PRAX or PTCT or BEAM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SNDX) is pulling ahead at 627. 8% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SNDX or PRAX or PTCT or BEAM?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -165. 6% for Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -274. 6% for BEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNDX leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SNDX or PRAX or PTCT or BEAM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SNDX or PRAX or PTCT or BEAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 13), +733. 2% 10Y return). Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +733. 2%, BEAM: +67. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SNDX and PRAX and PTCT and BEAM?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.