Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SNTG vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
SNTG vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $6M | $147M | $3.75B | $2.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $108K | $14.20B | $17.17B | $13.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $1.61B | $6.89B | $2.80B |
| Gross Margin | 92.5% | 35.4% | 61.8% | 79.3% |
| Operating Margin | -16.2% | 16.1% | 43.9% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.3x | 0.5x | 0.6x |
| Total Debt | $147K | $5.27B | $1.65B | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $2.25B | $4.45B | $4.67B |
SNTG vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sentage Holdings In… (SNTG) | 100 | 8.0 | -92.0% |
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 26.2 | -73.8% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 62.2 | -37.8% |
| FinVolution Group (FINV) | 100 | 78.4 | -21.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNTG vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNTG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +30.0% vs LX's -70.4%
LX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 8.8% NII/revenue growth vs SNTG's -26.6%
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 0.6x)
QFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 60.7%
- 16.1% 10Y total return vs FINV's -47.5%
- PEG 0.02 vs FINV's 0.19
- Beta 1.20, yield 9.3%, current ratio 2.45x
FINV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 4.31x
- Beta 1.12 vs SNTG's 1.26, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% NII/revenue growth vs SNTG's -26.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 0.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SNTG's 17.1% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs SNTG's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FINV's 4.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.0% vs LX's -70.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SNTG's 17.1% |
SNTG vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNTG vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
FINV leads 2 • LX leads 1 • SNTG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 159670.1x SNTG's $107,507. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNTG's -18.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $107,507 | $14.2B | $17.2B | $13.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $1.8B | $8.0B | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $1.6B | $6.9B | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $0 | $10.8B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.5% | +35.4% | +61.8% | +79.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.2% | +16.1% | +43.9% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.6% | +7.7% | +36.5% | +18.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | +5.9% | +53.5% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.7% | +110.3% | -9.7% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
LX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, QFIN trades at a 44% valuation discount to FINV's 3.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QFIN offers better value at 0.11x vs FINV's 1.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $147M | $3.8B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5M | $590M | $3.3B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.11x | 2.16x | 2.15x | 3.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.35x | 0.47x | 0.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.11x | 1.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 1.65x | 2.99x | 5.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 57.67x | 0.07x | 1.49x | 1.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 0.22x | 0.56x | 0.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.20x | 2.78x | 6.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-38 for SNTG. FINV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LX's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs SNTG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -38.5% | +14.7% | +28.8% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.5% | +7.2% | +12.2% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.3% | +11.0% | +23.1% | +12.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.5% | +19.5% | +35.6% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.49x | 0.07x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $3.0B | -$2.8B | -$4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $2.3B | $4.5B | $4.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $146,599 | $5.3B | $1.7B | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 153.26x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FINV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FINV five years ago would be worth $9,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,364 for LX. Over the past 12 months, SNTG leads with a +30.0% total return vs LX's -70.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FINV at 13.2% vs SNTG's -10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.1% | -31.8% | -22.5% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.0% | -70.4% | -63.6% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.1% | +8.1% | +0.6% | +45.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.8% | -66.4% | -19.1% | -2.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.8% | -74.1% | +16.1% | -47.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.0% | +2.6% | +0.2% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
FINV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FINV is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNTG's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FINV currently trades 47.0% from its 52-week high vs SNTG's 17.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.25x | 1.20x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.70 | $9.35 | $47.00 | $10.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.60 | $2.02 | $12.30 | $4.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +17.4% | +22.0% | +28.1% | +47.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.8 | 44.7 | 53.7 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 1.5M | 1.4M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QFIN and FINV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LX as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy", FINV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 16.0% for FINV (target: $6). For income investors, QFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 9.26% vs FINV's 4.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 | $28.15 | $5.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.9% | +9.3% | +4.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 | $8.32 | $1.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +11.6% | +3.3% |
QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FINV leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SNTG vs LX vs QFIN vs FINV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNTG or LX or QFIN or FINV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 6% for Sentage Holdings Inc. (SNTG). Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNTG or LX or QFIN or FINV?
On trailing P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus FinVolution Group at 3. 9x. On forward P/E, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qfin Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 02x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNTG or LX or QFIN or FINV?
Over the past 5 years, FinVolution Group (FINV) delivered a total return of -2.
3%, compared to -66. 4% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QFIN returned +16. 1% versus LX's -74. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNTG or LX or QFIN or FINV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FinVolution Group (FINV) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
12β versus Sentage Holdings Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning SNTG is approximately 13% more volatile than FINV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinVolution Group (FINV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 49% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNTG or LX or QFIN or FINV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -26. 6% for Sentage Holdings Inc. (SNTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qfin Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 7% year-over-year, compared to 2. 5% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNTG or LX or QFIN or FINV?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -1864. 8% for Sentage Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus -1615. 2% for SNTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNTG leads at 92. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNTG or LX or QFIN or FINV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus FinVolution Group's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) trades at 0. 3x forward P/E versus 0. 6x for FinVolution Group — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNTG or LX or QFIN or FINV?
In this comparison, QFIN (9.
3% yield), LX (6. 9% yield), FINV (4. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SNTG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNTG or LX or QFIN or FINV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FinVolution Group (FINV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 4. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FINV: -47. 5%, SNTG: -55. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNTG and LX and QFIN and FINV?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNTG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock. LX, QFIN, FINV pay a dividend while SNTG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.