Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SOHO vs CLDT vs APLE vs PK vs HST

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SOHO
Sotherly Hotels Inc.

REIT - Hotel & Motel

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$46M
5Y Perf.-23.5%
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust

REIT - Hotel & Motel

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$469M
5Y Perf.+5.3%
APLE
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

REIT - Hotel & Motel

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.28B
5Y Perf.+14.0%
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.

REIT - Hotel & Motel

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.25B
5Y Perf.+11.2%
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

REIT - Hotel & Motel

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14.89B
5Y Perf.+55.2%

SOHO vs CLDT vs APLE vs PK vs HST — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SOHO logoSOHO
CLDT logoCLDT
APLE logoAPLE
PK logoPK
HST logoHST
IndustryREIT - Hotel & MotelREIT - Hotel & MotelREIT - Hotel & MotelREIT - Hotel & MotelREIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$46M$469M$3.28B$2.25B$14.89B
Revenue (TTM)$179M$294M$1.42B$2.53B$6.11B
Net Income (TTM)$-310K$9M$172M$-215M$765M
Gross Margin25.0%-3.6%30.5%-4.7%39.7%
Operating Margin9.6%9.3%17.6%11.1%14.0%
Forward P/E71.3x20.6x24.4x19.8x
Total Debt$340M$359M$1.77B$4.26B$5.64B
Cash & Equiv.$7M$33M$39M$232M$768M

SOHO vs CLDT vs APLE vs PK vs HSTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SOHO
CLDT
APLE
PK
HST
StockMay 20Feb 26Return
Sotherly Hotels Inc. (SOHO)10076.5-23.5%
Chatham Lodging Tru… (CLDT)100105.3+5.3%
Apple Hospitality R… (APLE)100114.0+14.0%
Park Hotels & Resor… (PK)100111.2+11.2%
Host Hotels & Resor… (HST)100155.2+55.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SOHO vs CLDT vs APLE vs PK vs HST

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HST leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Sotherly Hotels Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SOHO
Sotherly Hotels Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

SOHO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 18.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.47x
  • Beta 0.52, yield 18.3%, current ratio 1.47x
  • Beta 0.52 vs PK's 1.32
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
The REIT Holding

CLDT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: real estate exposure
APLE
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
The REIT Holding

APLE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: real estate exposure
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, PK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

HST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 7.6%, EPS growth 11.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
  • 74.6% 10Y total return vs APLE's 17.6%
  • 7.6% FFO/revenue growth vs CLDT's -7.0%
  • Lower P/E (19.8x vs 24.4x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHST logoHST7.6% FFO/revenue growth vs CLDT's -7.0%
ValueHST logoHSTLower P/E (19.8x vs 24.4x)
Quality / MarginsHST logoHST12.5% margin vs PK's -8.5%
Stability / SafetySOHO logoSOHOBeta 0.52 vs PK's 1.32
DividendsSOHO logoSOHO18.3% yield, vs APLE's 6.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SOHO logoSOHO+199.2% vs PK's +21.9%
Efficiency (ROA)HST logoHST5.9% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs 2.2%

SOHO vs CLDT vs APLE vs PK vs HST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SOHOSotherly Hotels Inc.
FY 2024
Occupancy
65.5%$119M
Food and Beverage
20.1%$37M
Hotel, Other
14.4%$26M
CLDTChatham Lodging Trust
FY 2025
Occupancy
91.6%$269M
Hotel, Other
6.1%$18M
Food and Beverage
2.3%$7M
APLEApple Hospitality REIT, Inc.
FY 2025
Occupancy
90.5%$1.3B
Hotel, Other
4.8%$68M
Food and Beverage
4.7%$66M
PKPark Hotels & Resorts Inc.
FY 2025
Occupancy
59.2%$1.5B
Food and Beverage
27.0%$685M
Ancillary Hotel
10.2%$259M
Hotel, Other
3.6%$92M
HSTHost Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
FY 2025
Occupancy
60.0%$3.6B
Food And Beverage
30.0%$1.8B
Hotel Other
10.0%$604M

SOHO vs CLDT vs APLE vs PK vs HST — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHSTLAGGINGPK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HST is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 34.1x SOHO's $179M. HST is the more profitable business, keeping 12.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PK's -8.5%. On growth, HST holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSOHO logoSOHOSotherly Hotels I…CLDT logoCLDTChatham Lodging T…APLE logoAPLEApple Hospitality…PK logoPKPark Hotels & Res…HST logoHSTHost Hotels & Res…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$179M$294M$1.4B$2.5B$6.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$37M$87M$444M$612M$1.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$310,423$9M$172M-$215M$765M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$7M$60M$320M$448M$862M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.0%-3.6%+30.5%-4.7%+39.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.6%+9.3%+17.6%+11.1%+14.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.2%+3.1%+12.1%-8.5%+12.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.1%+20.3%+22.5%+17.7%+14.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.6%-1.6%+3.1%-1.3%+12.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.9%-8.2%-7.7%+117.2%+26.7%
HST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SOHO and CLDT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.8x trailing earnings, APLE trades at a 74% valuation discount to CLDT's 71.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLDT's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HST's 12.2x.

MetricSOHO logoSOHOSotherly Hotels I…CLDT logoCLDTChatham Lodging T…APLE logoAPLEApple Hospitality…PK logoPKPark Hotels & Res…HST logoHSTHost Hotels & Res…
Market CapShares × price$46M$469M$3.3B$2.3B$14.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$379M$796M$5.0B$6.3B$19.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.62x71.29x18.76x-7.88x19.70x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.57x24.41x19.76x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.47x9.23x11.31x11.17x12.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.25x1.59x2.32x0.89x2.44x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.05x0.64x1.05x0.72x2.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.78x11.87x11.59x22.08x17.36x
Evenly matched — SOHO and CLDT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HST delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PK. CLDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SOHO's 8.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HST scores 8/9 vs PK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSOHO logoSOHOSotherly Hotels I…CLDT logoCLDTChatham Lodging T…APLE logoAPLEApple Hospitality…PK logoPKPark Hotels & Res…HST logoHSTHost Hotels & Res…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-0.7%+1.2%+5.4%-6.7%+11.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.1%+0.8%+3.5%-2.6%+5.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.3%+1.7%+3.9%+2.2%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.6%+2.4%+5.3%+3.1%+6.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946548
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage8.18x0.46x0.56x1.38x0.84x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$333M$326M$1.7B$4.0B$4.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$33M$39M$232M$768M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$340M$359M$1.8B$4.3B$5.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.99x1.69x2.97x-0.01x4.48x
HST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HST five years ago would be worth $14,361 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,637 for SOHO. Over the past 12 months, SOHO leads with a +199.2% total return vs PK's +21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HST at 12.2% vs CLDT's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSOHO logoSOHOSotherly Hotels I…CLDT logoCLDTChatham Lodging T…APLE logoAPLEApple Hospitality…PK logoPKPark Hotels & Res…HST logoHSTHost Hotels & Res…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.1%+48.2%+17.8%+6.2%+20.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+199.2%+48.1%+30.7%+21.9%+54.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+20.6%+8.9%+10.0%+23.4%+41.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-33.6%-17.0%+13.7%-27.2%+43.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-26.4%-29.2%+17.6%-11.4%+74.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+6.5%+2.9%+3.2%+7.2%+12.2%
HST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SOHO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SOHO is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PK's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SOHO currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs PK's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSOHO logoSOHOSotherly Hotels I…CLDT logoCLDTChatham Lodging T…APLE logoAPLEApple Hospitality…PK logoPKPark Hotels & Res…HST logoHSTHost Hotels & Res…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.52x1.00x0.85x1.32x1.04x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.25$10.14$14.11$12.39$22.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.68$6.08$10.85$9.84$14.44
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+100.0%+98.4%+98.4%+90.3%+96.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.061.574.952.168.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded0280K3.2M3.9M8.3M
SOHO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SOHO and CLDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CLDT as "Buy", APLE as "Buy", PK as "Hold", HST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.2% upside for CLDT (target: $11) vs -7.7% for HST (target: $20). For income investors, SOHO offers the higher dividend yield at 18.26% vs HST's 4.14%.

MetricSOHO logoSOHOSotherly Hotels I…CLDT logoCLDTChatham Lodging T…APLE logoAPLEApple Hospitality…PK logoPKPark Hotels & Res…HST logoHSTHost Hotels & Res…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$11.00$14.00$11.50$20.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts13172542
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+18.3%+6.9%+12.6%+4.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.41$0.96$1.41$0.90
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.9%+1.9%+2.0%+1.4%
Evenly matched — SOHO and CLDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HST leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOHO leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.

Best OverallHost Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SOHO vs CLDT vs APLE vs PK vs HST: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SOHO or CLDT or APLE or PK or HST a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) is the stronger pick with 7. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SOHO or CLDT or APLE or PK or HST?

On trailing P/E, Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc.

(APLE) is the cheapest at 18. 8x versus Chatham Lodging Trust at 71. 3x. On forward P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SOHO or CLDT or APLE or PK or HST?

Over the past 5 years, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) delivered a total return of +43. 6%, compared to -33. 6% for Sotherly Hotels Inc. (SOHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HST returned +74. 6% versus CLDT's -29. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SOHO or CLDT or APLE or PK or HST?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sotherly Hotels Inc.

(SOHO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning PK is approximately 154% more volatile than SOHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 8% for Sotherly Hotels Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SOHO or CLDT or APLE or PK or HST?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) is pulling ahead at 7. 6% versus -7. 0% for Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Chatham Lodging Trust grew EPS 275. 0% year-over-year, compared to -240. 6% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOHO leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SOHO or CLDT or APLE or PK or HST?

Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus -11. 1% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: APLE leads at 17. 7% versus 8. 9% for PK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOHO leads at 25. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SOHO or CLDT or APLE or PK or HST more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

(HST) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 24. 4x for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLDT: 10. 2% to $11. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SOHO or CLDT or APLE or PK or HST?

In this comparison, SOHO (18.

3% yield), PK (12. 6% yield), APLE (6. 9% yield), HST (4. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CLDT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SOHO or CLDT or APLE or PK or HST better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sotherly Hotels Inc.

(SOHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 18. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOHO: -26. 4%, CLDT: -29. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SOHO and CLDT and APLE and PK and HST?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SOHO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLDT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APLE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HST is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SOHO, APLE, PK, HST pay a dividend while CLDT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SOHO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 7.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLDT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APLE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 5.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HST

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SOHO and CLDT and APLE and PK and HST on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SOHO: -6.6% · CLDT: -1.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.