Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SOWG vs NOMD vs SMPL vs BRZE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Software - Application
SOWG vs NOMD vs SMPL vs BRZE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1M | $1.44B | $1.24B | $2.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $3.03B | $1.45B | $738M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41M | $137M | $91M | $-131M |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.1% | 34.0% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.7% | 14.4% | -19.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.9x | 7.5x | 34.3x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.29B | $304M | $83M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $325M | $98M | $124M |
SOWG vs NOMD vs SMPL vs BRZE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sow Good Inc. (SOWG) | 100 | 4.4 | -95.6% |
| Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) | 100 | 39.5 | -60.5% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 33.2 | -66.8% |
| Braze, Inc. (BRZE) | 100 | 28.5 | -71.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOWG vs NOMD vs SMPL vs BRZE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOWG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NOMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 7.1%
- 40.1% 10Y total return vs SMPL's 3.7%
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 34.3x)
- Beta 0.07 vs SOWG's 1.34
SMPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- Beta 0.38, current ratio 3.64x
- 6.3% margin vs BRZE's -17.8%
- 3.7% ROA vs SOWG's -123.1%, ROIC 8.1% vs -21.5%
BRZE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 24.4%, EPS growth -19.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.6%
- 24.4% revenue growth vs SOWG's -100.0%
- -30.7% vs SOWG's -87.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.4% revenue growth vs SOWG's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 34.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs BRZE's -17.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs SOWG's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -30.7% vs SOWG's -87.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs SOWG's -123.1%, ROIC 8.1% vs -21.5% |
SOWG vs NOMD vs SMPL vs BRZE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SOWG vs NOMD vs SMPL vs BRZE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories
NOMD leads 1 • SOWG leads 0 • BRZE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NOMD and SOWG operate at a comparable scale, with $3.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRZE's -17.8%. On growth, BRZE holds the edge at +27.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $3.0B | $1.4B | $738M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $435M | $231M | -$131M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41M | $137M | $91M | -$131M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $252M | $174M | $61M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +27.1% | +34.0% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +10.7% | +14.4% | -19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +4.5% | +6.3% | -17.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.3% | +12.0% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.3% | -2.6% | -0.3% | +27.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | -123.1% | -31.6% | -70.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NOMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, NOMD trades at a 22% valuation discount to SMPL's 12.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NOMD's 7.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $1.4B | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $3.7B | $1.4B | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | 9.46x | 12.20x | -18.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.86x | 7.45x | 34.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.34x | 5.97x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.40x | 0.86x | 3.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.52x | 0.70x | 3.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.85x | 7.86x | 37.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NOMD delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SOWG. BRZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NOMD's 0.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMPL scores 5/9 vs SOWG's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +5.3% | +5.2% | -22.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -123.1% | +2.2% | +3.7% | -12.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.5% | +5.5% | +8.1% | -20.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.4% | +6.2% | +9.4% | -23.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.92x | 0.17x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $95,146 | $2.0B | $206M | -$42M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $325M | $98M | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.3B | $304M | $83M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -33.23x | 2.52x | 6.77x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NOMD and BRZE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NOMD five years ago would be worth $4,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $151 for SOWG. Over the past 12 months, BRZE leads with a -30.7% total return vs SOWG's -87.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BRZE at -7.4% vs SOWG's -73.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -76.6% | -15.4% | -36.4% | -30.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -87.0% | -43.5% | -64.8% | -30.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -40.3% | -67.8% | -20.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -59.7% | -64.3% | -75.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +40.1% | +3.7% | -75.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.3% | -15.8% | -31.5% | -7.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NOMD and BRZE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NOMD is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOWG's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BRZE currently trades 60.0% from its 52-week high vs SOWG's 3.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.07x | 0.08x | 0.34x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.80 | $19.71 | $36.92 | $37.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.70 | $9.17 | $10.21 | $15.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.8% | +51.3% | +33.7% | +60.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.2 | 58.6 | 42.9 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 374K | 1.6M | 2.8M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NOMD as "Buy", SMPL as "Buy", BRZE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 87.8% upside for BRZE (target: $42) vs 33.4% for NOMD (target: $14). NOMD is the only dividend payer here at 7.06% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $13.50 | $20.17 | $42.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 24 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.61 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +16.5% | +4.1% | 0.0% |
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NOMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SOWG vs NOMD vs SMPL vs BRZE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOWG or NOMD or SMPL or BRZE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is the stronger pick with 24. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOWG or NOMD or SMPL or BRZE?
On trailing P/E, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus The Simply Good Foods Company at 12. 2x. On forward P/E, Nomad Foods Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOWG or NOMD or SMPL or BRZE?
Over the past 5 years, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) delivered a total return of -59.
7%, compared to -98. 5% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOMD returned +31. 8% versus SOWG's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOWG or NOMD or SMPL or BRZE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
08β versus Braze, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning BRZE is approximately 1339% more volatile than NOMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Braze, Inc. (BRZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 92% for Nomad Foods Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SOWG or NOMD or SMPL or BRZE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is pulling ahead at 24. 4% versus -100. 0% for Sow Good Inc. (SOWG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Braze, Inc. grew EPS -19. 6% year-over-year, compared to -760. 0% for Sow Good Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRZE leads at 27. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SOWG or NOMD or SMPL or BRZE?
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -17. 8% for Braze, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -19. 6% for BRZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRZE leads at 67. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SOWG or NOMD or SMPL or BRZE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) trades at 6.
9x forward P/E versus 34. 3x for Braze, Inc. — 27. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRZE: 87. 8% to $42. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — SOWG or NOMD or SMPL or BRZE?
In this comparison, NOMD (7.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SOWG, SMPL, BRZE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SOWG or NOMD or SMPL or BRZE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
08), 7. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NOMD: +31. 8%, BRZE: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SOWG and NOMD and SMPL and BRZE?
These companies operate in different sectors (SOWG (Consumer Defensive) and NOMD (Consumer Defensive) and SMPL (Consumer Defensive) and BRZE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SOWG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NOMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; BRZE is a small-cap high-growth stock. NOMD pays a dividend while SOWG, SMPL, BRZE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.