Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SPT vs MANH vs HUBS vs WMS vs BRZE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SPT
Sprout Social, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$409M
5Y Perf.-93.9%
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.50B
5Y Perf.-8.1%
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.58B
5Y Perf.-69.7%
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.25B
5Y Perf.+16.5%
BRZE
Braze, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.31B
5Y Perf.-70.3%

SPT vs MANH vs HUBS vs WMS vs BRZE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SPT logoSPT
MANH logoMANH
HUBS logoHUBS
WMS logoWMS
BRZE logoBRZE
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationConstructionSoftware - Application
Market Cap$409M$8.50B$12.58B$12.25B$2.31B
Revenue (TTM)$458M$1.10B$3.30B$2.99B$738M
Net Income (TTM)$-43M$217M$100M$471M$-131M
Gross Margin77.6%55.6%83.7%38.2%67.1%
Operating Margin-9.5%25.6%1.9%22.8%-19.6%
Forward P/E7.4x26.8x19.6x23.7x35.7x
Total Debt$67M$112M$485M$1.45B$83M
Cash & Equiv.$95M$329M$882M$463M$124M

SPT vs MANH vs HUBS vs WMS vs BRZELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SPT
MANH
HUBS
WMS
BRZE
StockNov 21May 26Return
Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT)1006.1-93.9%
Manhattan Associate… (MANH)10091.9-8.1%
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS)10030.3-69.7%
Advanced Drainage S… (WMS)100116.5+16.5%
Braze, Inc. (BRZE)10029.7-70.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SPT vs MANH vs HUBS vs WMS vs BRZE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MANH leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. SPT and BRZE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SPT
Sprout Social, Inc.
The Value Play

SPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (7.4x vs 35.7x)
Best for: value
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
The Income Pick

MANH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10
  • 19.7% margin vs BRZE's -17.8%
  • Beta 1.10 vs WMS's 1.32, lower leverage
  • 28.0% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 236.8% vs -20.5%
Best for: income & stability
HUBS
HubSpot, Inc.
The Growth Play

HUBS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 8.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 23.5%, current ratio 1.52x
  • Beta 1.18, current ratio 1.52x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

WMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 5.5% 10Y total return vs HUBS's 469.1%
  • 0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +30.2% vs SPT's -67.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
BRZE
Braze, Inc.
The Growth Leader

BRZE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 24.4% revenue growth vs WMS's 1.0%
Best for: growth
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBRZE logoBRZE24.4% revenue growth vs WMS's 1.0%
ValueSPT logoSPTLower P/E (7.4x vs 35.7x)
Quality / MarginsMANH logoMANH19.7% margin vs BRZE's -17.8%
Stability / SafetyMANH logoMANHBeta 1.10 vs WMS's 1.32, lower leverage
DividendsWMS logoWMS0.4% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)WMS logoWMS+30.2% vs SPT's -67.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MANH logoMANH28.0% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 236.8% vs -20.5%

SPT vs MANH vs HUBS vs WMS vs BRZE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SPTSprout Social, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription
99.0%$453M
Professional Services And Other
1.0%$5M
MANHManhattan Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
46.5%$503M
Cloud Subscriptions
37.7%$408M
Maintenance
12.0%$130M
Hardware
2.4%$25M
License and Maintenance
1.4%$15M
HUBSHubSpot, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
97.8%$3.1B
Service
2.2%$67M
WMSAdvanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Pipe Segment
57.7%$1.6B
Allied Products And Other Business Segments
26.2%$707M
Infiltrator Water Technologies Segment
22.1%$596M
Intersegment Eliminations
-6.0%$-162,827,000
BRZEBraze, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription Revenue
96.1%$570M
Professional Services Revenue
3.9%$23M

SPT vs MANH vs HUBS vs WMS vs BRZE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMANHLAGGINGBRZE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MANH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

HUBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 7.2x SPT's $458M. MANH is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRZE's -17.8%. On growth, BRZE holds the edge at +27.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSPT logoSPTSprout Social, In…MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.WMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$458M$1.1B$3.3B$3.0B$738M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$31M$288M$166M$869M-$131M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$43M$217M$100M$471M-$131M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$39M$380M$712M$577M$61M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.6%+55.6%+83.7%+38.2%+67.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.5%+25.6%+1.9%+22.8%-19.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-9.5%+19.7%+3.0%+15.7%-17.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.6%+34.5%+21.6%+19.3%+8.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.9%+7.4%+23.4%+0.4%+27.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.0%-3.5%+2.5%+14.4%-70.6%
MANH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 25.0x trailing earnings, WMS trades at a 91% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WMS's 15.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HUBS's 69.2x.

MetricSPT logoSPTSprout Social, In…MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.WMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$409M$8.5B$12.6B$12.2B$2.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$380M$8.3B$12.2B$13.2B$2.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-9.19x39.88x284.08x25.01x-18.52x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.44x26.79x19.61x23.71x35.72x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.86x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple28.67x69.24x15.74x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.89x7.86x4.02x4.22x3.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.96x27.85x6.29x6.89x3.91x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.39x22.74x17.77x33.23x37.34x
SPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $-23 for SPT. BRZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMS's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MANH scores 6/9 vs BRZE's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSPT logoSPTSprout Social, In…MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.WMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-22.9%+78.2%+5.0%+23.2%-22.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-9.4%+28.0%+2.7%+11.4%-12.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-21.8%+2.4%+0.4%+20.7%-20.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-18.3%+76.3%+0.5%+21.5%-23.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946663
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.33x0.36x0.23x0.88x0.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$28M-$216M-$397M$982M-$42M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$95M$329M$882M$463M$124M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$67M$112M$485M$1.4B$83M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-16.09x4753.07x7.75x
MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WMS five years ago would be worth $12,716 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,066 for SPT. Over the past 12 months, WMS leads with a +30.2% total return vs SPT's -67.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMS at 18.8% vs SPT's -44.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSPT logoSPTSprout Social, In…MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.WMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-34.3%-14.2%-36.1%-3.6%-30.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-67.1%-21.9%-62.0%+30.2%-30.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.1%-15.3%-45.1%+67.7%-20.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.3%+8.1%-52.1%+27.2%-75.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.0%+145.1%+469.1%+549.9%-75.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-44.8%-5.4%-18.1%+18.8%-7.4%
WMS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MANH and WMS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MANH is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WMS's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMS currently trades 80.4% from its 52-week high vs SPT's 26.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSPT logoSPTSprout Social, In…MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.WMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.27x1.10x1.18x1.32x1.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.48$247.22$682.57$179.31$37.67
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.92$119.06$187.45$104.69$15.26
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+26.7%+58.1%+35.8%+80.4%+60.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.950.651.151.347.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.6M678K1.5M860K3.0M
Evenly matched — MANH and WMS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SPT as "Buy", MANH as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", WMS as "Hold", BRZE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 744.1% upside for SPT (target: $57) vs 37.4% for MANH (target: $197). WMS is the only dividend payer here at 0.44% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSPT logoSPTSprout Social, In…MANH logoMANHManhattan Associa…HUBS logoHUBSHubSpot, Inc.WMS logoWMSAdvanced Drainage…BRZE logoBRZEBraze, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$57.40$197.25$360.89$202.67$42.44
# AnalystsCovering analysts1615472225
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises22
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.64
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.7%+4.0%+0.6%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MANH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallManhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SPT vs MANH vs HUBS vs WMS vs BRZE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SPT or MANH or HUBS or WMS or BRZE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Braze, Inc.

(BRZE) is the stronger pick with 24. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS) offers the better valuation at 25. 0x trailing P/E (23. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SPT or MANH or HUBS or WMS or BRZE?

On trailing P/E, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

(WMS) is the cheapest at 25. 0x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, Sprout Social, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SPT or MANH or HUBS or WMS or BRZE?

Over the past 5 years, Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

(WMS) delivered a total return of +27. 2%, compared to -89. 3% for Sprout Social, Inc. (SPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMS returned +549. 9% versus BRZE's -75. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SPT or MANH or HUBS or WMS or BRZE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Manhattan Associates, Inc.

(MANH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning WMS is approximately 21% more volatile than MANH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Braze, Inc. (BRZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 88% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SPT or MANH or HUBS or WMS or BRZE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Braze, Inc.

(BRZE) is pulling ahead at 24. 4% versus 1. 0% for Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. (WMS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to -19. 6% for Braze, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRZE leads at 27. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SPT or MANH or HUBS or WMS or BRZE?

Manhattan Associates, Inc.

(MANH) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -17. 8% for Braze, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26. 1% versus -19. 6% for BRZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SPT or MANH or HUBS or WMS or BRZE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sprout Social, Inc.

(SPT) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 35. 7x for Braze, Inc. — 28. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPT: 744. 1% to $57. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SPT or MANH or HUBS or WMS or BRZE?

In this comparison, WMS (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. SPT, MANH, HUBS, BRZE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SPT or MANH or HUBS or WMS or BRZE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, HubSpot, Inc.

(HUBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +469. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBS: +469. 1%, BRZE: -75. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SPT and MANH and HUBS and WMS and BRZE?

These companies operate in different sectors (SPT (Technology) and MANH (Technology) and HUBS (Technology) and WMS (Industrials) and BRZE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WMS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BRZE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SPT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MANH

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUBS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WMS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BRZE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SPT and MANH and HUBS and WMS and BRZE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SPT: 12.9% · MANH: 7.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.