Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SRCE vs MBWM vs IBCP vs FULT vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SRCE vs MBWM vs IBCP vs FULT vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.79B | $898M | $699M | $4.13B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $600M | $372M | $315M | $1.89B | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $161M | $89M | $69M | $392M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 70.3% | 64.0% | 69.6% | 67.4% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 34.2% | 27.5% | 25.8% | 25.7% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 9.5x | 9.6x | 10.6x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $341M | $826M | $117M | $1.30B | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $69M | $473M | $52M | $271M | $380M |
SRCE vs MBWM vs IBCP vs FULT vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Source Corporat… (SRCE) | 100 | 213.0 | +113.0% |
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 226.7 | +126.7% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 191.3 | +91.3% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRCE vs MBWM vs IBCP vs FULT vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRCE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 20.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 25.8%, current ratio 12.62x
- NIM 3.8% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- 5.2% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
MBWM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 178.2% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 184.6%
- PEG 0.63 vs IBCP's 1.82
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 10.6x), PEG 0.63 vs 0.76
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
FULT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +29.6% vs IBCP's +12.6%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SRCE's 2.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.2% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 10.6x), PEG 0.63 vs 0.76 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs SRCE's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.6% vs IBCP's +12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
SRCE vs MBWM vs IBCP vs FULT vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SRCE vs MBWM vs IBCP vs FULT vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SRCE leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 2 • SFNC leads 1 • MBWM leads 0 • FULT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SRCE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 6.0x IBCP's $315M. SRCE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $600M | $372M | $315M | $1.9B | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $163M | $107M | $89M | $529M | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $161M | $89M | $69M | $392M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $152M | $11M | $70M | $267M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.3% | +64.0% | +69.6% | +67.4% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +27.5% | +25.8% | +25.7% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +23.9% | +21.7% | +20.7% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +3.0% | +22.2% | +15.0% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | +14.8% | +2.3% | +47.2% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 16% valuation discount to SRCE's 11.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.63x vs IBCP's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $898M | $699M | $4.1B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $1.3B | $764M | $5.2B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.40x | 9.53x | 10.38x | 10.31x | -7.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.85x | 9.54x | 9.56x | 10.61x | 10.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.75x | 0.63x | 1.97x | 0.74x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.64x | 11.75x | 9.39x | 9.74x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.99x | 2.42x | 2.22x | 2.18x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 1.17x | 1.41x | 1.13x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.41x | 80.15x | 9.96x | 14.52x | 6.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SRCE scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +13.5% | +14.2% | +11.6% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +1.4% | +1.3% | +1.2% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.7% | +5.5% | +10.2% | +7.5% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +8.0% | +2.6% | +9.5% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 1.14x | 0.23x | 0.37x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $271M | $353M | $65M | $1.0B | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $69M | $473M | $52M | $271M | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $341M | $826M | $117M | $1.3B | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.98x | 0.79x | 0.91x | 0.84x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MBWM five years ago would be worth $17,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +29.6% total return vs IBCP's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs SFNC's 15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.3% | +10.1% | +7.2% | +11.1% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.9% | +23.6% | +12.6% | +29.6% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.8% | +127.3% | +130.6% | +130.4% | +53.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.5% | +78.4% | +63.7% | +41.4% | -15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +154.9% | +178.2% | +184.6% | +106.1% | +25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.6% | +31.5% | +32.1% | +32.1% | +15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SRCE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRCE is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SRCE currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.87x | 0.83x | 1.13x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.64 | $55.77 | $37.39 | $22.99 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.89 | $42.17 | $29.63 | $16.60 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +93.3% | +90.8% | +93.3% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 53.1 | 50.6 | 55.8 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 147K | 112K | 176K | 2.0M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SRCE and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SRCE as "Hold", MBWM as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 6.1% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs SRCE's 2.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $81.00 | $57.00 | $38.00 | $24.00 | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 7 | 7 | 20 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.8% | +3.0% | +3.6% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 30 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.58 | $1.47 | $1.03 | $0.77 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
SRCE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). IBCP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SRCE vs MBWM vs IBCP vs FULT vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRCE or MBWM or IBCP or FULT or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the stronger pick with 5.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SRCE or MBWM or IBCP or FULT or SFNC?
On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus 1st Source Corporation at 11. 4x. On forward P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mercantile Bank Corporation wins at 0. 63x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SRCE or MBWM or IBCP or FULT or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) delivered a total return of +78.
4%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SRCE or MBWM or IBCP or FULT or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning FULT is approximately 53% more volatile than SRCE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SRCE or MBWM or IBCP or FULT or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is pulling ahead at 5.
2% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SRCE or MBWM or IBCP or FULT or SFNC?
1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
4% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SRCE leads at 34. 2% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SRCE leads at 70. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SRCE or MBWM or IBCP or FULT or SFNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 63x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for 1st Source Corporation — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 11. 9% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SRCE or MBWM or IBCP or FULT or SFNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 1% for 1st Source Corporation (SRCE).
09Is SRCE or MBWM or IBCP or FULT or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, 1st Source Corporation (SRCE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74), 2. 1% yield, +154. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRCE: +154. 9%, FULT: +106. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SRCE and MBWM and IBCP and FULT and SFNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SRCE is a small-cap deep-value stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.