Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SSB vs CFG vs HBAN vs FIS vs FISV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
SSB vs CFG vs HBAN vs FIS vs FISV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $9.79B | $27.70B | $25.63B | $24.47B | $30.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.76B | $12.35B | $12.48B | $10.89B | $21.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $799M | $1.70B | $2.21B | $382M | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | 68.3% | 57.6% | 61.7% | 38.1% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 15.3% | 21.5% | 17.5% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 12.4x | 11.1x | 7.5x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.31B | $12.40B | $18.48B | $4.01B | $29.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $583M | $11.24B | $1.78B | $599M | $798M |
SSB vs CFG vs HBAN vs FIS vs FISV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SouthState Corporat… (SSB) | 100 | 185.3 | +85.3% |
| Citizens Financial … (CFG) | 100 | 266.4 | +166.4% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 53.2 | -46.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SSB vs CFG vs HBAN vs FIS vs FISV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SSB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs CFG's 2.6%
- 57.0% NII/revenue growth vs CFG's 1.3%
- 21.3% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 2.4% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs HBAN's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 257.8% 10Y total return vs HBAN's 121.5%
- +73.3% vs FISV's -68.8%
Among these 5 stocks, HBAN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Beta 0.76 vs CFG's 1.33, lower leverage
FISV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- PEG 0.20 vs HBAN's 0.74
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.31
- 4.0% ROA vs CFG's 0.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs 3.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 57.0% NII/revenue growth vs CFG's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.3% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs CFG's 1.33, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs HBAN's 3.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.3% vs FISV's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs CFG's 0.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs 3.8% |
SSB vs CFG vs HBAN vs FIS vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SSB vs CFG vs HBAN vs FIS vs FISV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FISV leads in 1 of 6 categories
CFG leads 1 • SSB leads 0 • HBAN leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SSB and FIS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 5.6x SSB's $3.8B. SSB is the more profitable business, keeping 21.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.8B | $12.3B | $12.5B | $10.9B | $21.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $2.6B | $3.1B | $3.8B | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $799M | $1.7B | $2.2B | $382M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $154M | $2.7B | $2.3B | $2.8B | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.3% | +57.6% | +61.7% | +38.1% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +15.3% | +21.5% | +17.5% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +12.2% | +17.7% | +3.5% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.4% | +15.2% | +18.2% | +26.1% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +8.2% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.9% | +38.2% | -11.8% | +92.3% | -29.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.8B | $27.7B | $25.6B | $24.5B | $30.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | $28.9B | $42.3B | $27.9B | $58.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.39x | 21.19x | 11.65x | 63.00x | 8.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.30x | 12.39x | 11.10x | 7.54x | 7.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | — | 0.77x | 2.58x | 0.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.98x | 12.10x | 15.75x | 7.66x | 6.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.61x | 2.24x | 2.05x | 2.29x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.20x | 1.00x | 1.76x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.74x | 11.25x | 9.97x | 7.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SSB and FISV each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FISV delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. SSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFG scores 7/9 vs SSB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +6.6% | +10.0% | +2.7% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.8% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +3.8% | +5.1% | +6.0% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +4.4% | +4.5% | +6.6% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.51x | 0.76x | 0.29x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $731M | $1.2B | $16.7B | $3.4B | $28.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $583M | $11.2B | $1.8B | $599M | $798M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $12.4B | $18.5B | $4.0B | $29.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | 0.55x | 0.62x | 4.64x | 6.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CFG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFG five years ago would be worth $14,687 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CFG leads with a +73.3% total return vs FISV's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CFG at 39.1% vs FISV's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +9.7% | -6.5% | -27.3% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.3% | +73.3% | +12.4% | -35.3% | -68.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.3% | +169.3% | +85.1% | -6.6% | -52.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.3% | +46.9% | +22.0% | -63.2% | -51.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.9% | +257.8% | +121.5% | -13.2% | +9.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.5% | +39.1% | +22.8% | -2.2% | -22.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CFG and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FIS is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CFG's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CFG currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 1.33x | 1.09x | 0.76x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $108.46 | $68.79 | $19.46 | $82.74 | $191.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $84.48 | $37.93 | $14.87 | $43.30 | $52.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +93.3% | +83.2% | +57.1% | +29.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 60.2 | 53.4 | 43.3 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 841K | 4.5M | 24.3M | 5.5M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SSB and HBAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SSB as "Buy", CFG as "Buy", HBAN as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 12.8% for CFG (target: $72). For income investors, HBAN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs SSB's 2.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $118.20 | $72.42 | $20.38 | $67.38 | $74.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 38 | 48 | 37 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +2.6% | +3.7% | +3.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 3 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.30 | $1.70 | $0.60 | $1.63 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +4.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +19.4% |
FISV leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
SSB vs CFG vs HBAN vs FIS vs FISV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SSB or CFG or HBAN or FIS or FISV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the stronger pick with 57.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SouthState Corporation (SSB) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SSB or CFG or HBAN or FIS or FISV?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's 0. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SSB or CFG or HBAN or FIS or FISV?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
(CFG) delivered a total return of +46. 9%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFG returned +257. 8% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SSB or CFG or HBAN or FIS or FISV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning CFG is approximately 75% more volatile than FIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SouthState Corporation (SSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SSB or CFG or HBAN or FIS or FISV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SouthState Corporation (SSB) is pulling ahead at 57.
0% versus 1. 3% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fiserv, Inc. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FISV leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SSB or CFG or HBAN or FIS or FISV?
SouthState Corporation (SSB) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSB leads at 27. 9% versus 15. 3% for CFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SSB or CFG or HBAN or FIS or FISV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's 0. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — SSB or CFG or HBAN or FIS or FISV?
In this comparison, HBAN (3.
7% yield), FIS (3. 5% yield), CFG (2. 6% yield), SSB (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SSB or CFG or HBAN or FIS or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, FISV: +9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SSB and CFG and HBAN and FIS and FISV?
These companies operate in different sectors (SSB (Financial Services) and CFG (Financial Services) and HBAN (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and FISV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SSB is a small-cap high-growth stock; CFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HBAN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. SSB, CFG, HBAN, FIS pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.