SY vs DOCS vs MTCH vs HIMS vs TDOC

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 1% for So-Young International Inc. (SY). Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate So-Young International Inc. (SY) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Match Group, Inc.

(MTCH) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, Match Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Match Group, Inc. 's 0. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -95. 4% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTCH returned +204. 1% versus SY's -83. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Doximity, Inc.

(DOCS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 150% more volatile than DOCS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -2. 1% for So-Young International Inc. (SY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teladoc Health, Inc. grew EPS 80. 6% year-over-year, compared to -28. 4% for So-Young International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Doximity, Inc.

(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -40. 2% for So-Young International Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -42. 6% for SY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Match Group, Inc. 's 0. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 44. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOCS: 64. 4% to $42. 79.

In this comparison, MTCH (2.

0% yield), SY (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. DOCS, HIMS, TDOC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Match Group, Inc.

(MTCH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10), 2. 0% yield, +204. 1% 10Y return). Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTCH: +204. 1%, TDOC: -38. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (SY (Healthcare) and DOCS (Healthcare) and MTCH (Communication Services) and HIMS (Healthcare) and TDOC (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTCH is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SY, MTCH pay a dividend while DOCS, HIMS, TDOC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.