Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $192.18B | $86.24B | $252.37B | $91.81B | $838.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $115.84B | $42.86B | $125.40B | $33.69B | $270.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14.91B | $7.58B | $21.06B | $6.53B | $58.03B |
| Gross Margin | 49.0% | 62.8% | 62.2% | 59.4% | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 22.2% | 18.6% | 21.5% | 27.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.2x | 10.9x | 11.7x | 12.3x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $663.58B | $77.93B | $281.88B | $61.67B | $751.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $116.93B | $46.89B | $203.36B | $46.25B | $469.32B |
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Toronto-Dominio… (TD) | 100 | 255.0 | +155.0% |
| U.S. Bancorp (USB) | 100 | 150.6 | +50.6% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 100 | 318.8 | +218.8% |
| The PNC Financial S… (PNC) | 100 | 215.8 | +115.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 330.5 | +230.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 2.8%
- PEG 0.98 vs PNC's 3.22
- Beta 0.76, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.12x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
USB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, current ratio 2.73x
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 14.0x)
WFC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 2.5% vs TD's 1.6%
Among these 5 stocks, PNC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JPM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 21.7%
- 433.3% 10Y total return vs TD's 209.4%
- 14.6% NII/revenue growth vs TD's -2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% NII/revenue growth vs TD's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 14.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs JPM's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs WFC's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.9% vs WFC's +10.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% |
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
TD leads 2 • USB leads 1 • WFC leads 0 • PNC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — USB and JPM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 8.0x PNC's $33.7B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WFC's 15.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $115.8B | $42.9B | $125.4B | $33.7B | $270.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20.0B | $10.3B | $31.6B | $8.3B | $81.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14.9B | $7.6B | $21.1B | $6.5B | $58.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13.0B | $5.1B | -$14.2B | $5.4B | -$119.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.0% | +62.8% | +62.2% | +59.4% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +22.2% | +18.6% | +21.5% | +27.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +17.7% | +15.7% | +17.5% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -62.0% | — | +2.4% | +23.4% | -15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.2% | +24.8% | +16.9% | +24.6% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
USB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 27% valuation discount to PNC's 16.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TD offers better value at 1.10x vs PNC's 4.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $192.2B | $86.2B | $252.4B | $91.8B | $838.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $585.1B | $117.3B | $330.9B | $107.2B | $1.12T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.69x | 12.03x | 15.20x | 16.53x | 15.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.21x | 10.88x | 11.66x | 12.31x | 13.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.10x | 1.41x | 2.72x | 4.32x | 1.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.17x | 11.40x | 10.70x | 14.30x | 13.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 2.01x | 2.01x | 2.72x | 3.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.13x | 1.31x | 1.56x | 1.67x | 2.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 83.15x | 11.65x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $11 for PNC. PNC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TD's 5.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | +11.5% | +11.5% | +11.1% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +5.2% | +3.7% | +4.5% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +2.3% | +5.0% | +5.3% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.19x | 1.19x | 1.56x | 1.13x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $546.6B | $31.0B | $78.5B | $15.4B | $281.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $116.9B | $46.9B | $203.4B | $46.3B | $469.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $663.6B | $77.9B | $281.9B | $61.7B | $751.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.66x | 0.60x | 0.72x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,067 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,721 for USB. Over the past 12 months, TD leads with a +67.9% total return vs WFC's +10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.8% vs USB's 25.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.0% | +3.8% | -13.3% | +9.0% | -3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.9% | +31.0% | +10.6% | +33.8% | +19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.7% | +96.8% | +113.6% | +99.9% | +134.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.9% | +7.2% | +88.5% | +32.9% | +100.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.4% | +68.2% | +89.7% | +206.8% | +433.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.6% | +25.3% | +28.8% | +26.0% | +32.8% |
Risk & Volatility
TD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TD is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TD currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs WFC's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.93x | 0.94x | 0.84x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.56 | $61.19 | $97.76 | $243.94 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.56 | $42.55 | $71.93 | $172.73 | $260.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +90.6% | +83.5% | +93.1% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 41.9 | 54.1 | 50.3 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.9M | 7.6M | 13.1M | 1.6M | 7.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TD as "Buy", USB as "Hold", WFC as "Hold", PNC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.8% upside for WFC (target: $99) vs -21.3% for TD (target: $90). For income investors, TD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.82% vs JPM's 1.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.52 | $63.82 | $99.38 | $252.63 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 49 | 60 | 46 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | — | +1.8% | +2.8% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.46 | — | $1.48 | $6.34 | $5.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | 0.0% | +8.8% | +1.3% | +3.4% |
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TD leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TD vs USB vs WFC vs PNC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TD or USB or WFC or PNC or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TD or USB or WFC or PNC or JPM?
On trailing P/E, U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. at 16. 5x. On forward P/E, U. S. Bancorp is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Toronto-Dominion Bank wins at 0. 98x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TD or USB or WFC or PNC or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +100. 7%, compared to +7. 2% for U. S. Bancorp (USB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +433. 3% versus USB's +68. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TD or USB or WFC or PNC or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 01β — meaning JPM is approximately 32% more volatile than TD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 113% versus 5% for The Toronto-Dominion Bank — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TD or USB or WFC or PNC or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -2. 8% for The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Toronto-Dominion Bank grew EPS 144. 9% year-over-year, compared to 7. 4% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TD or USB or WFC or PNC or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 15. 7% for Wells Fargo & Company — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 18. 6% for WFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USB leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TD or USB or WFC or PNC or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. 's 3. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, U. S. Bancorp (USB) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 0x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WFC: 21. 8% to $99. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — TD or USB or WFC or PNC or JPM?
In this comparison, TD (2.
8% yield), PNC (2. 8% yield), WFC (1. 8% yield), JPM (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. USB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TD or USB or WFC or PNC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76), 2. 8% yield, +209. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TD: +209. 4%, USB: +68. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TD and USB and WFC and PNC and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TD, WFC, PNC, JPM pay a dividend while USB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.