Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TGL
Treasure Global Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
PAYO
Payoneer Global Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.74B
5Y Perf.-23.6%
FLYW
Flywire Corporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.12B
5Y Perf.-28.7%
RELY
Remitly Global, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.80B
5Y Perf.+99.0%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$443.44B
5Y Perf.+54.4%

TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TGL logoTGL
PAYO logoPAYO
FLYW logoFLYW
RELY logoRELY
MA logoMA
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - InfrastructureInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$8M$1.74B$2.12B$4.80B$443.44B
Revenue (TTM)$3M$1.07B$188.60B$1.73B$32.79B
Net Income (TTM)$-27M$72M$12.54B$106M$15.57B
Gross Margin41.4%61.9%0.2%43.6%83.4%
Operating Margin-8.7%11.7%5.7%6.9%59.2%
Forward P/E20.4x49.5x44.1x25.5x
Total Debt$159K$72M$0.00$220M$19.00B
Cash & Equiv.$237K$416M$330M$542M$10.57B

TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TGL
PAYO
FLYW
RELY
MA
StockAug 22May 26Return
Treasure Global Inc. (TGL)1000.0-100.0%
Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO)10076.4-23.6%
Flywire Corporation (FLYW)10071.3-28.7%
Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY)100199.0+99.0%
Mastercard Incorpor… (MA)100154.4+54.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MA leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Treasure Global Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. PAYO and RELY also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TGL
Treasure Global Inc.
The Momentum Pick

TGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +184.8% vs PAYO's -17.9%
Best for: momentum
PAYO
Payoneer Global Inc.
The Value Play

PAYO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (20.4x vs 25.5x)
Best for: value
FLYW
Flywire Corporation
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, FLYW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
RELY
Remitly Global, Inc.
The Growth Play

RELY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 25.4%, current ratio 3.30x
  • Beta 1.19, current ratio 3.30x
  • 29.4% revenue growth vs TGL's -89.4%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
The Banking Pick

MA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 0.6%
  • 437.2% 10Y total return vs PAYO's -47.7%
  • 45.6% margin vs TGL's -8.9%
  • Beta 0.67 vs TGL's 2.48
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRELY logoRELY29.4% revenue growth vs TGL's -89.4%
ValuePAYO logoPAYOLower P/E (20.4x vs 25.5x)
Quality / MarginsMA logoMA45.6% margin vs TGL's -8.9%
Stability / SafetyMA logoMABeta 0.67 vs TGL's 2.48
DividendsMA logoMA0.6% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TGL logoTGL+184.8% vs PAYO's -17.9%
Efficiency (ROA)MA logoMA29.5% ROA vs TGL's -113.2%, ROIC 56.5% vs -237.6%

TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TGLTreasure Global Inc.
FY 2025
Software Development
0.0%$-1,480,000
PAYOPayoneer Global Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FLYWFlywire Corporation
FY 2025
Transactions
100.0%$503M
RELYRemitly Global, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.6B
MAMastercard Incorporated
FY 2025
Payment Network
59.4%$19.5B
Value-Added Services And Solutions
40.6%$13.3B

TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMALAGGINGRELY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 61138.9x TGL's $3M. MA is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TGL's -8.9%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTGL logoTGLTreasure Global I…PAYO logoPAYOPayoneer Global I…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…RELY logoRELYRemitly Global, I…MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3M$1.1B$188.6B$1.7B$32.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$26M$208M$10.8B$149M$21.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$27M$72M$12.5B$106M$15.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$14M$215M-$15.8B$256M$17.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+41.4%+61.9%+0.2%+43.6%+83.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-8.7%+11.7%+5.7%+6.9%+59.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-8.9%+6.8%+6.6%+6.1%+45.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.5%+20.2%-8.4%+14.8%+51.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.6%+6.1%+1408.6%+25.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.1%+20.0%+4.0%+3.6%+21.2%
MA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PAYO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 26.6x trailing earnings, PAYO trades at a 83% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PAYO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.

MetricTGL logoTGLTreasure Global I…PAYO logoPAYOPayoneer Global I…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…RELY logoRELYRemitly Global, I…MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…
Market CapShares × price$8M$1.7B$2.1B$4.8B$443.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8M$1.4B$1.8B$4.5B$451.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.24x26.63x161.18x73.52x30.32x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.42x49.50x44.06x25.55x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.44x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.36x47.80x41.98x22.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.38x1.66x3.40x2.94x13.52x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.51x2.71x2.71x5.71x58.07x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.44x21.41x16.24x26.22x
PAYO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-153 for TGL. TGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MA's 2.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs TGL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTGL logoTGLTreasure Global I…PAYO logoPAYOPayoneer Global I…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…RELY logoRELYRemitly Global, I…MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-152.8%+10.0%+5.9%+12.7%+2.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-113.2%+0.9%+4.3%+8.1%+29.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.4%+30.7%+2.1%+14.2%+56.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-3.0%+14.9%+1.3%+9.4%+64.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945659
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.10x0.25x2.45x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$77,658-$343M-$330M-$322M$8.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$236,895$416M$330M$542M$10.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$159,237$72M$0$220M$19.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2110.70x17.23x1.84x16.25x27.23x
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MA five years ago would be worth $13,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for TGL. Over the past 12 months, TGL leads with a +184.8% total return vs PAYO's -17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MA at 9.7% vs TGL's -90.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTGL logoTGLTreasure Global I…PAYO logoPAYOPayoneer Global I…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…RELY logoRELYRemitly Global, I…MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-33.1%-7.0%+27.6%+72.4%-10.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+184.8%-17.9%+62.7%+8.1%-11.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-9.0%-40.1%+25.4%+32.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-49.8%-49.5%-53.0%+36.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-47.7%-49.5%-53.0%+437.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-90.4%-3.1%-15.7%+7.8%+9.7%
MA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLYW and MA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGL's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs TGL's 8.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTGL logoTGLTreasure Global I…PAYO logoPAYOPayoneer Global I…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…RELY logoRELYRemitly Global, I…MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.48x1.65x1.32x1.13x0.67x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$58.00$7.67$18.05$24.71$601.77
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.27$4.08$9.79$12.08$480.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+8.1%+66.0%+98.2%+92.2%+83.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.445.183.085.342.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded43K3.5M1.9M3.4M3.2M
Evenly matched — FLYW and MA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PAYO as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", RELY as "Buy", MA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.2% upside for PAYO (target: $8) vs -7.9% for RELY (target: $21). MA is the only dividend payer here at 0.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTGL logoTGLTreasure Global I…PAYO logoPAYOPayoneer Global I…FLYW logoFLYWFlywire Corporati…RELY logoRELYRemitly Global, I…MA logoMAMastercard Incorp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.50$17.50$21.00$656.87
# AnalystsCovering analysts10191364
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.07
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+10.0%+3.7%+1.1%+2.6%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

MA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PAYO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallMastercard Incorporated (MA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.

(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -89. 4% for Treasure Global Inc. (TGL). Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?

On trailing P/E, Payoneer Global Inc.

(PAYO) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Payoneer Global Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?

Over the past 5 years, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) delivered a total return of +36.

8%, compared to -100. 0% for Treasure Global Inc. (TGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +437. 2% versus TGL's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

67β versus Treasure Global Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning TGL is approximately 271% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Treasure Global Inc. (TGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.

(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus -89. 4% for Treasure Global Inc. (TGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -38. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELY leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the more profitable company, earning 45.

6% net margin versus -1003. 1% for Treasure Global Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MA leads at 59. 2% versus -945. 3% for TGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Payoneer Global Inc.

(PAYO) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 29. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAYO: 48. 2% to $7. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?

In this comparison, MA (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. TGL, PAYO, FLYW, RELY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

67), 0. 6% yield, +437. 2% 10Y return). Treasure Global Inc. (TGL) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +437. 2%, TGL: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TGL and PAYO and FLYW and RELY and MA?

These companies operate in different sectors (TGL (Technology) and PAYO (Technology) and FLYW (Technology) and RELY (Technology) and MA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock. MA pays a dividend while TGL, PAYO, FLYW, RELY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TGL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 129%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PAYO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLYW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 70429%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RELY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MA

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TGL and PAYO and FLYW and RELY and MA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TGL: 258.1% · PAYO: 6.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.