Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $8M | $1.74B | $2.12B | $4.80B | $443.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $1.07B | $188.60B | $1.73B | $32.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $72M | $12.54B | $106M | $15.57B |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | 61.9% | 0.2% | 43.6% | 83.4% |
| Operating Margin | -8.7% | 11.7% | 5.7% | 6.9% | 59.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.4x | 49.5x | 44.1x | 25.5x |
| Total Debt | $159K | $72M | $0.00 | $220M | $19.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $237K | $416M | $330M | $542M | $10.57B |
TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treasure Global Inc. (TGL) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) | 100 | 76.4 | -23.6% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 71.3 | -28.7% |
| Remitly Global, Inc. (RELY) | 100 | 199.0 | +99.0% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 154.4 | +54.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +184.8% vs PAYO's -17.9%
PAYO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 25.5x)
Among these 5 stocks, FLYW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RELY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 29.4%, EPS growth 263.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 25.4%, current ratio 3.30x
- Beta 1.19, current ratio 3.30x
- 29.4% revenue growth vs TGL's -89.4%
MA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 0.6%
- 437.2% 10Y total return vs PAYO's -47.7%
- 45.6% margin vs TGL's -8.9%
- Beta 0.67 vs TGL's 2.48
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.4% revenue growth vs TGL's -89.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 25.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.6% margin vs TGL's -8.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs TGL's 2.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +184.8% vs PAYO's -17.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.5% ROA vs TGL's -113.2%, ROIC 56.5% vs -237.6% |
TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MA leads in 3 of 6 categories
PAYO leads 1 • TGL leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • RELY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 61138.9x TGL's $3M. MA is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TGL's -8.9%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $1.1B | $188.6B | $1.7B | $32.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$26M | $208M | $10.8B | $149M | $21.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | $72M | $12.5B | $106M | $15.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $215M | -$15.8B | $256M | $17.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | +61.9% | +0.2% | +43.6% | +83.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +11.7% | +5.7% | +6.9% | +59.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -8.9% | +6.8% | +6.6% | +6.1% | +45.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +20.2% | -8.4% | +14.8% | +51.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +6.1% | +1408.6% | +25.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.1% | +20.0% | +4.0% | +3.6% | +21.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PAYO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.6x trailing earnings, PAYO trades at a 83% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PAYO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLYW's 47.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $1.7B | $2.1B | $4.8B | $443.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $1.4B | $1.8B | $4.5B | $451.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.24x | 26.63x | 161.18x | 73.52x | 30.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.42x | 49.50x | 44.06x | 25.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.36x | 47.80x | 41.98x | 22.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.38x | 1.66x | 3.40x | 2.94x | 13.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.51x | 2.71x | 2.71x | 5.71x | 58.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.44x | 21.41x | 16.24x | 26.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-153 for TGL. TGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MA's 2.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs TGL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -152.8% | +10.0% | +5.9% | +12.7% | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -113.2% | +0.9% | +4.3% | +8.1% | +29.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | +30.7% | +2.1% | +14.2% | +56.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.0% | +14.9% | +1.3% | +9.4% | +64.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.10x | — | 0.25x | 2.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$77,658 | -$343M | -$330M | -$322M | $8.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $236,895 | $416M | $330M | $542M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $159,237 | $72M | $0 | $220M | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2110.70x | 17.23x | 1.84x | 16.25x | 27.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MA five years ago would be worth $13,678 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for TGL. Over the past 12 months, TGL leads with a +184.8% total return vs PAYO's -17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MA at 9.7% vs TGL's -90.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.1% | -7.0% | +27.6% | +72.4% | -10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +184.8% | -17.9% | +62.7% | +8.1% | -11.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -9.0% | -40.1% | +25.4% | +32.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -49.8% | -49.5% | -53.0% | +36.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -47.7% | -49.5% | -53.0% | +437.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -90.4% | -3.1% | -15.7% | +7.8% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and MA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGL's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs TGL's 8.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.48x | 1.65x | 1.32x | 1.13x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.00 | $7.67 | $18.05 | $24.71 | $601.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.27 | $4.08 | $9.79 | $12.08 | $480.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.1% | +66.0% | +98.2% | +92.2% | +83.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.4 | 45.1 | 83.0 | 85.3 | 42.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 43K | 3.5M | 1.9M | 3.4M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PAYO as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", RELY as "Buy", MA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.2% upside for PAYO (target: $8) vs -7.9% for RELY (target: $21). MA is the only dividend payer here at 0.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.50 | $17.50 | $21.00 | $656.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 19 | 13 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.0% | +3.7% | +1.1% | +2.6% |
MA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PAYO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TGL vs PAYO vs FLYW vs RELY vs MA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is the stronger pick with 29. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -89. 4% for Treasure Global Inc. (TGL). Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Payoneer Global Inc. (PAYO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?
On trailing P/E, Payoneer Global Inc.
(PAYO) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Payoneer Global Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?
Over the past 5 years, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) delivered a total return of +36.
8%, compared to -100. 0% for Treasure Global Inc. (TGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +437. 2% versus TGL's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Treasure Global Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning TGL is approximately 271% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Treasure Global Inc. (TGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Remitly Global, Inc.
(RELY) is pulling ahead at 29. 4% versus -89. 4% for Treasure Global Inc. (TGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -38. 7% for Payoneer Global Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RELY leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?
Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
6% net margin versus -1003. 1% for Treasure Global Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MA leads at 59. 2% versus -945. 3% for TGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Payoneer Global Inc.
(PAYO) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 29. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAYO: 48. 2% to $7. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA?
In this comparison, MA (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. TGL, PAYO, FLYW, RELY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TGL or PAYO or FLYW or RELY or MA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 0. 6% yield, +437. 2% 10Y return). Treasure Global Inc. (TGL) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +437. 2%, TGL: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TGL and PAYO and FLYW and RELY and MA?
These companies operate in different sectors (TGL (Technology) and PAYO (Technology) and FLYW (Technology) and RELY (Technology) and MA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAYO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; RELY is a small-cap high-growth stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock. MA pays a dividend while TGL, PAYO, FLYW, RELY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.