Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TIRX
Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd

Insurance - Brokers

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$240K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
HUIZ
Huize Holding Limited

Insurance - Brokers

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$857K
5Y Perf.-93.9%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.96B
5Y Perf.+85.6%
GOCO
GoHealth, Inc.

Insurance - Brokers

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11M
5Y Perf.-99.3%
SLQT
SelectQuote, Inc.

Insurance - Brokers

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$197M
5Y Perf.-95.9%

TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TIRX logoTIRX
HUIZ logoHUIZ
ACMR logoACMR
GOCO logoGOCO
SLQT logoSLQT
IndustryInsurance - BrokersInsurance - BrokersSemiconductorsInsurance - BrokersInsurance - Brokers
Market Cap$240K$857K$3.96B$11M$197M
Revenue (TTM)$8M$1.34B$960M$738M$1.64B
Net Income (TTM)$-859K$18M$91M$-199M$73M
Gross Margin23.0%28.8%44.2%82.6%69.8%
Operating Margin-31.7%0.1%12.5%-40.7%3.5%
Forward P/E36.7x30.8x84.2x
Total Debt$1M$91M$303M$528M$416M
Cash & Equiv.$297K$233M$766M$41M$32M

TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TIRX
HUIZ
ACMR
GOCO
SLQT
StockJan 21Apr 26Return
Tian Ruixiang Holdi… (TIRX)1000.0-100.0%
Huize Holding Limit… (HUIZ)1006.1-93.9%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100185.6+85.6%
GoHealth, Inc. (GOCO)1000.7-99.3%
SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT)1004.1-95.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACMR leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. HUIZ and SLQT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TIRX
Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd
The Insurance Pick

TIRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 3.5%, current ratio 6.74x
  • Beta 1.13, current ratio 6.74x
  • 158.7% revenue growth vs HUIZ's 4.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
HUIZ
Huize Holding Limited
The Insurance Pick

HUIZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.41 vs ACMR's 3.17
Best for: stability
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Income Pick

ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 3.17, yield 0.2%
  • 31.0% 10Y total return vs SLQT's -95.9%
  • Lower P/E (30.8x vs 84.2x)
  • 9.5% margin vs GOCO's -27.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
GOCO
GoHealth, Inc.
The Insurance Play

Among these 5 stocks, GOCO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
SLQT
SelectQuote, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

SLQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 106.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
  • 5.7% ROA vs GOCO's -15.3%, ROIC 5.3% vs -0.6%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTIRX logoTIRX158.7% revenue growth vs HUIZ's 4.5%
ValueACMR logoACMRLower P/E (30.8x vs 84.2x)
Quality / MarginsACMR logoACMR9.5% margin vs GOCO's -27.0%
Stability / SafetyHUIZ logoHUIZBeta 0.41 vs ACMR's 3.17
DividendsACMR logoACMR0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ACMR logoACMR+166.8% vs TIRX's -99.9%
Efficiency (ROA)SLQT logoSLQT5.7% ROA vs GOCO's -15.3%, ROIC 5.3% vs -0.6%

TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TIRXTian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd
FY 2024
Commissions
100.0%$3M
HUIZHuize Holding Limited
FY 2024
Health Insurance Product Line
88.5%$1.1B
Accident and Health Insurance Product Line
11.5%$137M
ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
GOCOGoHealth, Inc.
FY 2024
Commission
100.0%$516M
SLQTSelectQuote, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
52.1%$798M
Pharmacy
47.6%$729M
Product and Service, Other
0.3%$4M

TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACMRLAGGINGGOCO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — TIRX and ACMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

SLQT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 211.5x TIRX's $8M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GOCO's -27.0%. On growth, TIRX holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTIRX logoTIRXTian Ruixiang Hol…HUIZ logoHUIZHuize Holding Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.GOCO logoGOCOGoHealth, Inc.SLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8M$1.3B$960M$738M$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$4M$133M-$194M$63M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$858,880$18M$91M-$199M$73M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M$0-$108M-$78M-$62M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+23.0%+28.8%+44.2%+82.6%+69.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-31.7%+0.1%+12.5%-40.7%+3.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-11.1%+1.4%+9.5%-27.0%+4.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.3%-1.9%-11.3%-10.6%-3.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.6%+40.2%+34.2%-71.1%+5.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+92.3%+3.3%-20.0%-30.4%-114.5%
Evenly matched — TIRX and ACMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HUIZ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 43.7x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 48% valuation discount to SLQT's 84.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GOCO's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.8x.

MetricTIRX logoTIRXTian Ruixiang Hol…HUIZ logoHUIZHuize Holding Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.GOCO logoGOCOGoHealth, Inc.SLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$240,371$856,661$4.0B$11M$197M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1M-$20M$3.5B$499M$581M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.06x-8.98x43.69x-1.38x84.21x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.36.74x30.81x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.23x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-8.92x27.83x5.04x6.53x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.07x0.00x4.40x0.01x0.13x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.01x0.01x2.09x0.02x0.35x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.27x
HUIZ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SLQT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

SLQT delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-64 for GOCO. TIRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOCO's 1.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOCO scores 4/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.

MetricTIRX logoTIRXTian Ruixiang Hol…HUIZ logoHUIZHuize Holding Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.GOCO logoGOCOGoHealth, Inc.SLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-12.0%+4.2%+5.1%-64.4%+12.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-14.2%+2.0%+3.4%-15.3%+5.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-10.4%-5.0%+7.0%-0.6%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-14.0%-4.1%+6.6%-0.6%+6.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933244
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.21x0.16x1.15x0.72x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$881,311-$142M-$463M$487M$384M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$297,288$233M$766M$41M$32M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$91M$303M$528M$416M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense20.41x-4.03x4.11x
SLQT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $26,731 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for TIRX. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +166.8% total return vs TIRX's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 81.1% vs TIRX's -95.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTIRX logoTIRXTian Ruixiang Hol…HUIZ logoHUIZHuize Holding Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.GOCO logoGOCOGoHealth, Inc.SLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-98.1%-37.4%+33.4%-62.1%-18.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.9%-19.9%+166.8%-89.1%-59.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-71.8%+494.3%-92.9%-21.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-94.5%+167.3%-99.5%-96.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-96.6%+3100.5%-99.7%-95.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-95.0%-34.4%+81.1%-58.7%-7.6%
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HUIZ and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HUIZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACMR currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs TIRX's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTIRX logoTIRXTian Ruixiang Hol…HUIZ logoHUIZHuize Holding Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.GOCO logoGOCOGoHealth, Inc.SLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.13x0.41x3.17x2.12x2.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.75$4.53$71.65$8.75$2.80
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$1.19$19.76$0.90$0.56
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.1%+37.3%+83.5%+10.4%+40.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.443.766.334.066.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.2M293K1.1M79K1.3M
Evenly matched — HUIZ and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: HUIZ as "Hold", ACMR as "Buy", SLQT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 257.1% upside for SLQT (target: $4) vs 25.3% for ACMR (target: $75). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTIRX logoTIRXTian Ruixiang Hol…HUIZ logoHUIZHuize Holding Lim…ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.GOCO logoGOCOGoHealth, Inc.SLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$75.00$4.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts11011
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises321
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.3%+0.2%+13.1%0.0%
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). HUIZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX) is the stronger pick with 158.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 5% for Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 7x trailing P/E (30. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?

On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 7x versus SelectQuote, Inc. at 84. 2x. On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?

Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) delivered a total return of +167. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +31. 0% versus TIRX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

41β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 17β — meaning ACMR is approximately 668% more volatile than HUIZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 115% for GoHealth, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX) is pulling ahead at 158.

7% versus 4. 5% for Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SelectQuote, Inc. grew EPS 106. 7% year-over-year, compared to -100. 9% for Huize Holding Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?

ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -123. 8% for Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -144. 3% for TIRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOCO leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) trades at 30. 8x forward P/E versus 36. 7x for Huize Holding Limited — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLQT: 257. 1% to $4. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?

In this comparison, ACMR (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. TIRX, HUIZ, GOCO, SLQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

41)). GoHealth, Inc. (GOCO) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUIZ: -96. 6%, GOCO: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TIRX and HUIZ and ACMR and GOCO and SLQT?

These companies operate in different sectors (TIRX (Financial Services) and HUIZ (Financial Services) and ACMR (Technology) and GOCO (Financial Services) and SLQT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TIRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUIZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLQT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TIRX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 1078%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUIZ

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOCO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 49%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLQT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TIRX and HUIZ and ACMR and GOCO and SLQT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TIRX: 2156.6% · HUIZ: 40.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.