Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
Semiconductors
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Brokers
TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers | Semiconductors | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers |
| Market Cap | $240K | $857K | $3.96B | $11M | $197M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8M | $1.34B | $960M | $738M | $1.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-859K | $18M | $91M | $-199M | $73M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 28.8% | 44.2% | 82.6% | 69.8% |
| Operating Margin | -31.7% | 0.1% | 12.5% | -40.7% | 3.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 36.7x | 30.8x | — | 84.2x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $91M | $303M | $528M | $416M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $297K | $233M | $766M | $41M | $32M |
TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tian Ruixiang Holdi… (TIRX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Huize Holding Limit… (HUIZ) | 100 | 6.1 | -93.9% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| GoHealth, Inc. (GOCO) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
| SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) | 100 | 4.1 | -95.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TIRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 3.5%, current ratio 6.74x
- Beta 1.13, current ratio 6.74x
- 158.7% revenue growth vs HUIZ's 4.5%
HUIZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.41 vs ACMR's 3.17
ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 3.17, yield 0.2%
- 31.0% 10Y total return vs SLQT's -95.9%
- Lower P/E (30.8x vs 84.2x)
- 9.5% margin vs GOCO's -27.0%
Among these 5 stocks, GOCO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SLQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 106.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
- 5.7% ROA vs GOCO's -15.3%, ROIC 5.3% vs -0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 158.7% revenue growth vs HUIZ's 4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.8x vs 84.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.5% margin vs GOCO's -27.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs ACMR's 3.17 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +166.8% vs TIRX's -99.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs GOCO's -15.3%, ROIC 5.3% vs -0.6% |
TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
HUIZ leads 1 • SLQT leads 1 • TIRX leads 0 • GOCO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TIRX and ACMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLQT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 211.5x TIRX's $8M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GOCO's -27.0%. On growth, TIRX holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8M | $1.3B | $960M | $738M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $4M | $133M | -$194M | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$858,880 | $18M | $91M | -$199M | $73M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $0 | -$108M | -$78M | -$62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +28.8% | +44.2% | +82.6% | +69.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.7% | +0.1% | +12.5% | -40.7% | +3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.1% | +1.4% | +9.5% | -27.0% | +4.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | -1.9% | -11.3% | -10.6% | -3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | +40.2% | +34.2% | -71.1% | +5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.3% | +3.3% | -20.0% | -30.4% | -114.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HUIZ leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.7x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 48% valuation discount to SLQT's 84.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GOCO's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $240,371 | $856,661 | $4.0B | $11M | $197M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | -$20M | $3.5B | $499M | $581M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.06x | -8.98x | 43.69x | -1.38x | 84.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 36.74x | 30.81x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.23x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -8.92x | 27.83x | 5.04x | 6.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 0.00x | 4.40x | 0.01x | 0.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.01x | 2.09x | 0.02x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.27x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLQT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLQT delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-64 for GOCO. TIRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOCO's 1.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOCO scores 4/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.0% | +4.2% | +5.1% | -64.4% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.2% | +2.0% | +3.4% | -15.3% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.4% | -5.0% | +7.0% | -0.6% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.0% | -4.1% | +6.6% | -0.6% | +6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.21x | 0.16x | 1.15x | 0.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $881,311 | -$142M | -$463M | $487M | $384M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $297,288 | $233M | $766M | $41M | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $91M | $303M | $528M | $416M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 20.41x | -4.03x | 4.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $26,731 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for TIRX. Over the past 12 months, ACMR leads with a +166.8% total return vs TIRX's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 81.1% vs TIRX's -95.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.1% | -37.4% | +33.4% | -62.1% | -18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -19.9% | +166.8% | -89.1% | -59.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -71.8% | +494.3% | -92.9% | -21.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -94.5% | +167.3% | -99.5% | -96.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -96.6% | +3100.5% | -99.7% | -95.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -95.0% | -34.4% | +81.1% | -58.7% | -7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HUIZ and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUIZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACMR currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs TIRX's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 0.41x | 3.17x | 2.12x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.75 | $4.53 | $71.65 | $8.75 | $2.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $1.19 | $19.76 | $0.90 | $0.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +37.3% | +83.5% | +10.4% | +40.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 43.7 | 66.3 | 34.0 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 293K | 1.1M | 79K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HUIZ as "Hold", ACMR as "Buy", SLQT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 257.1% upside for SLQT (target: $4) vs 25.3% for ACMR (target: $75). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $75.00 | — | $4.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 10 | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.11 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | +0.2% | +13.1% | 0.0% |
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). HUIZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TIRX vs HUIZ vs ACMR vs GOCO vs SLQT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX) is the stronger pick with 158.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 5% for Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 7x trailing P/E (30. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?
On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 7x versus SelectQuote, Inc. at 84. 2x. On forward P/E, ACM Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +167. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +31. 0% versus TIRX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
41β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 17β — meaning ACMR is approximately 668% more volatile than HUIZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 115% for GoHealth, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd (TIRX) is pulling ahead at 158.
7% versus 4. 5% for Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SelectQuote, Inc. grew EPS 106. 7% year-over-year, compared to -100. 9% for Huize Holding Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?
ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -123. 8% for Tian Ruixiang Holdings Ltd — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -144. 3% for TIRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOCO leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) trades at 30. 8x forward P/E versus 36. 7x for Huize Holding Limited — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLQT: 257. 1% to $4. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT?
In this comparison, ACMR (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. TIRX, HUIZ, GOCO, SLQT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TIRX or HUIZ or ACMR or GOCO or SLQT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Huize Holding Limited (HUIZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
41)). GoHealth, Inc. (GOCO) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUIZ: -96. 6%, GOCO: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TIRX and HUIZ and ACMR and GOCO and SLQT?
These companies operate in different sectors (TIRX (Financial Services) and HUIZ (Financial Services) and ACMR (Technology) and GOCO (Financial Services) and SLQT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TIRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUIZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLQT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.