Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TMUS vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs AAPL vs GOOGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Consumer Electronics
Internet Content & Information
TMUS vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs AAPL vs GOOGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Consumer Electronics | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $210.16B | $374.00B | $95.62B | $4.22T | $4.81T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90.53B | $45.18B | $125.28B | $451.44B | $422.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10.54B | $10.98B | $18.60B | $122.58B | $160.21B |
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | 48.5% | 61.7% | 47.9% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.4% | 29.5% | 15.3% | 32.6% | 32.7% |
| Forward P/E | 18.5x | 24.8x | 7.4x | 33.8x | 29.6x |
| Total Debt | $122.27B | $14.46B | $110.44B | $112.38B | $59.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.60B | $9.03B | $9.48B | $35.93B | $30.71B |
TMUS vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs AAPL vs GOOGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) | 100 | 194.1 | +94.1% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.3 | -33.7% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.6 | +261.6% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TMUS vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs AAPL vs GOOGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, TMUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NFLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0%
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.40 vs AAPL's 1.89
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.40 vs 0.99
AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs GOOGL's 10.0%
- 34.0% ROA vs TMUS's 4.9%, ROIC 67.4% vs 8.1%
GOOGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 37.9% margin vs TMUS's 11.6%
- +163.5% vs NFLX's -23.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 29.6x), PEG 0.40 vs 0.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs TMUS's 11.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs GOOGL's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs TMUS's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs TMUS's 4.9%, ROIC 67.4% vs 8.1% |
TMUS vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs AAPL vs GOOGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TMUS vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs AAPL vs GOOGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
CMCSA leads 2 • AAPL leads 1 • TMUS leads 0 • NFLX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 10.0x NFLX's $45.2B. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TMUS's 11.6%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90.5B | $45.2B | $125.3B | $451.4B | $422.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $29.9B | $30.1B | $35.4B | $160.0B | $161.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10.5B | $11.0B | $18.6B | $122.6B | $160.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10.7B | $9.5B | $18.1B | $129.2B | $73.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.3% | +48.5% | +61.7% | +47.9% | +60.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | +29.5% | +15.3% | +32.6% | +32.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.6% | +24.3% | +14.8% | +27.2% | +37.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +20.9% | +14.5% | +28.6% | +17.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +17.6% | +5.3% | +16.6% | +21.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.0% | +31.1% | -32.6% | +21.8% | +81.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 87% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $210.2B | $374.0B | $95.6B | $4.22T | $4.81T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $326.8B | $379.4B | $196.6B | $4.30T | $4.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.98x | 34.89x | 4.87x | 38.53x | 36.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.45x | 24.80x | 7.44x | 33.78x | 29.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | 1.06x | 0.26x | 2.16x | 1.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.13x | 12.61x | 5.33x | 29.68x | 32.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 8.28x | 0.77x | 10.14x | 11.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.71x | 14.32x | 0.98x | 58.49x | 11.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.32x | 39.53x | 4.37x | 42.72x | 65.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $18 for TMUS. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TMUS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs TMUS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.8% | +41.3% | +19.5% | +146.7% | +39.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +19.8% | +6.9% | +34.0% | +27.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +29.8% | +8.2% | +67.4% | +25.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +30.5% | +8.9% | +69.6% | +30.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.07x | 0.54x | 1.13x | 1.52x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $116.7B | $5.4B | $101.0B | $76.4B | $28.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.6B | $9.0B | $9.5B | $35.9B | $30.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $122.3B | $14.5B | $110.4B | $112.4B | $59.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.33x | 17.33x | 6.84x | — | 392.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,482 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs CMCSA's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.2% | -3.0% | -8.9% | +6.2% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.2% | -23.6% | -19.9% | +47.0% | +163.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +166.5% | -26.4% | +67.4% | +270.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.5% | +75.2% | -45.2% | +124.4% | +239.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +407.2% | +875.3% | +15.4% | +1174.1% | +996.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | +38.6% | -9.7% | +18.7% | +54.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TMUS and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TMUS is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOOGL's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.28x | 0.39x | 0.21x | 0.99x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $261.56 | $134.12 | $36.66 | $292.13 | $400.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $181.36 | $75.01 | $25.75 | $193.25 | $147.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.2% | +65.8% | +71.6% | +98.4% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 35.3 | 37.8 | 69.4 | 83.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.6M | 44.0M | 28.4M | 39.8M | 28.3M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TMUS as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $254.08 | $116.29 | $31.87 | $317.11 | $406.28 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 54 | 99 | 60 | 110 | 82 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | — | +5.1% | +0.4% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 18 | 14 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.64 | — | $1.35 | $1.03 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +2.4% | +7.5% | +2.1% | +0.9% |
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CMCSA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TMUS vs NFLX vs CMCSA vs AAPL vs GOOGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TMUS or NFLX or CMCSA or AAPL or GOOGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TMUS or NFLX or CMCSA or AAPL or GOOGL?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TMUS or NFLX or CMCSA or AAPL or GOOGL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -45. 2% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus CMCSA's +15. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TMUS or NFLX or CMCSA or AAPL or GOOGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus Alphabet Inc. 's 1. 26β — meaning GOOGL is approximately -550% more volatile than TMUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 2% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TMUS or NFLX or CMCSA or AAPL or GOOGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to 0. 6% for T-Mobile US, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TMUS or NFLX or CMCSA or AAPL or GOOGL?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 12. 4% for T-Mobile US, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus 16. 7% for CMCSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCSA leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TMUS or NFLX or CMCSA or AAPL or GOOGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Apple Inc. — 26. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — TMUS or NFLX or CMCSA or AAPL or GOOGL?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield), TMUS (1. 9% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TMUS or NFLX or CMCSA or AAPL or GOOGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, T-Mobile US, Inc.
(TMUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 1. 9% yield, +407. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TMUS: +407. 2%, GOOGL: +996. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TMUS and NFLX and CMCSA and AAPL and GOOGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (TMUS (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and CMCSA (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TMUS is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock. TMUS, CMCSA pay a dividend while NFLX, AAPL, GOOGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.