Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Asset Management | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $14.81B | $2.06B | $584M | $812M | $1.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.15B | $384M | $440M | $345M | $1.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $342M | $86M | $-85M | $-28M | $-693M |
| Gross Margin | 25.8% | 96.2% | 43.9% | 51.5% | 39.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 34.2% | -15.4% | -9.8% | -58.5% |
| Forward P/E | 22.8x | 9.0x | 26.2x | 20.5x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $40M | $175M | $402M | $25M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.35B | $55M | $80M | $162M | $558M |
TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toast, Inc. (TOST) | 100 | 56.7 | -43.3% |
| Patria Investments … (PAX) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
| PAR Technology Corp… (PAR) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
| Riskified Ltd. (RSKD) | 100 | 20.8 | -79.2% |
| Lightspeed Commerce… (LSPD) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TOST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 16.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.1%
- 10.9% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 30.8% vs -36.8%
PAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -14.9% 10Y total return vs PAR's 142.6%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 19.3x)
- 22.3% margin vs LSPD's -58.0%
- +24.7% vs PAR's -77.0%
PAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.54
- 30.2% revenue growth vs PAX's 2.6%
RSKD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 5.03x
- Beta 1.05, current ratio 5.03x
- Beta 1.05 vs LSPD's 1.58
Among these 5 stocks, LSPD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.2% revenue growth vs PAX's 2.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs LSPD's -58.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs LSPD's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.7% vs PAR's -77.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.9% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 30.8% vs -36.8% |
TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PAX leads in 2 of 6 categories
TOST leads 1 • RSKD leads 1 • PAR leads 1 • LSPD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TOST is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 17.9x RSKD's $345M. PAX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LSPD's -58.0%. On growth, PAR holds the edge at +23.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.2B | $384M | $440M | $345M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $361M | $174M | -$20M | -$27M | -$562M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $342M | $86M | -$85M | -$28M | -$693M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $608M | $236M | -$19M | $34M | $31M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | +96.2% | +43.9% | +51.5% | +39.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +34.2% | -15.4% | -9.8% | -58.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +22.3% | -19.2% | -8.0% | -58.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | — | -4.3% | +9.9% | +2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.0% | — | +23.2% | +6.2% | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +190.9% | -40.5% | +18.2% | +2.5% | -41.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PAX leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.9x trailing earnings, PAX trades at a 53% valuation discount to TOST's 50.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PAX's 16.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TOST's 36.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.8B | $2.1B | $584M | $812M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.5B | $2.2B | $907M | $675M | $752M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.55x | 23.93x | -6.63x | -26.39x | -2.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.84x | 9.03x | 26.20x | 20.47x | 19.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 8.50x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 36.27x | 16.61x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 5.37x | 1.28x | 2.36x | 1.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.09x | 3.19x | 0.68x | 2.54x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.35x | — | — | 24.55x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TOST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TOST delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-46 for LSPD. LSPD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAR's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TOST scores 7/9 vs LSPD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.1% | +14.3% | -10.1% | -8.4% | -46.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.9% | +6.3% | -6.1% | -6.3% | -41.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +30.8% | +12.7% | -5.5% | -22.2% | -36.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.9% | +13.8% | -6.8% | -7.6% | -33.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.27x | 0.49x | 0.08x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.3B | $120M | $323M | -$137M | -$541M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $55M | $80M | $162M | $558M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40M | $175M | $402M | $25M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.45x | -9.78x | — | -510.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TOST and PAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PAX five years ago would be worth $11,399 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,535 for LSPD. Over the past 12 months, PAX leads with a +24.7% total return vs PAR's -77.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOST at 13.5% vs PAR's -22.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.8% | -17.9% | -61.2% | -1.2% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.6% | +24.7% | -77.0% | +2.4% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.3% | +4.7% | -53.0% | +0.6% | -35.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.7% | +14.0% | -81.6% | -81.7% | -84.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.7% | -14.9% | +142.6% | -81.7% | -71.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.5% | +1.5% | -22.3% | +0.2% | -13.6% |
Risk & Volatility
RSKD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RSKD is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LSPD's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSKD currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs PAR's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 1.09x | 1.54x | 1.05x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $49.66 | $17.80 | $72.15 | $5.68 | $14.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.35 | $10.65 | $11.59 | $3.70 | $8.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.0% | +72.6% | +19.2% | +83.6% | +65.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.9 | 54.5 | 46.7 | 68.0 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.8M | 856K | 1.9M | 766K | 833K |
Analyst Outlook
PAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TOST as "Buy", PAX as "Buy", PAR as "Buy", RSKD as "Buy", LSPD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.5% upside for PAR (target: $25) vs 21.1% for RSKD (target: $6).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.76 | $18.00 | $25.00 | $5.75 | $12.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 5 | 11 | 11 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +13.1% | +10.2% |
PAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TOST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is the stronger pick with 30.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Patria Investments Limited (PAX). Patria Investments Limited (PAX) offers the better valuation at 23. 9x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Toast, Inc. (TOST) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?
On trailing P/E, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the cheapest at 23.
9x versus Toast, Inc. at 50. 6x. On forward P/E, Patria Investments Limited is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?
Over the past 5 years, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) delivered a total return of +14.
0%, compared to -84. 7% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAR returned +142. 6% versus RSKD's -81. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Riskified Ltd.
(RSKD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Lightspeed Commerce Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning LSPD is approximately 51% more volatile than RSKD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 49% for PAR Technology Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is pulling ahead at 30.
2% versus 2. 6% for Patria Investments Limited (PAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toast, Inc. grew EPS 1639% year-over-year, compared to -1392. 9% for PAR Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOST leads at 31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?
Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
3% net margin versus -62. 0% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAX leads at 34. 2% versus -64. 6% for LSPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAX leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) trades at 9.
0x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for PAR Technology Corporation — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAR: 80. 5% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
09)). Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAX: -14. 9%, LSPD: -71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TOST and PAX and PAR and RSKD and LSPD?
These companies operate in different sectors (TOST (Technology) and PAX (Financial Services) and PAR (Technology) and RSKD (Technology) and LSPD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TOST is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; RSKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LSPD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.