Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TOST
Toast, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$14.81B
5Y Perf.-43.3%
PAX
Patria Investments Limited

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$2.06B
5Y Perf.-20.9%
PAR
PAR Technology Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$584M
5Y Perf.-77.5%
RSKD
Riskified Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • IL
Market Cap$812M
5Y Perf.-79.2%
LSPD
Lightspeed Commerce Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.29B
5Y Perf.-90.2%

TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TOST logoTOST
PAX logoPAX
PAR logoPAR
RSKD logoRSKD
LSPD logoLSPD
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureAsset ManagementSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationSoftware - Application
Market Cap$14.81B$2.06B$584M$812M$1.29B
Revenue (TTM)$6.15B$384M$440M$345M$1.19B
Net Income (TTM)$342M$86M$-85M$-28M$-693M
Gross Margin25.8%96.2%43.9%51.5%39.6%
Operating Margin4.8%34.2%-15.4%-9.8%-58.5%
Forward P/E22.8x9.0x26.2x20.5x19.3x
Total Debt$40M$175M$402M$25M$17M
Cash & Equiv.$1.35B$55M$80M$162M$558M

TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TOST
PAX
PAR
RSKD
LSPD
StockSep 21May 26Return
Toast, Inc. (TOST)10056.7-43.3%
Patria Investments … (PAX)10079.1-20.9%
PAR Technology Corp… (PAR)10022.5-77.5%
Riskified Ltd. (RSKD)10020.8-79.2%
Lightspeed Commerce… (LSPD)1009.8-90.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PAX leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Toast, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. PAR and RSKD also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TOST
Toast, Inc.
The Growth Play

TOST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 16.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.1%
  • 10.9% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 30.8% vs -36.8%
Best for: growth exposure
PAX
Patria Investments Limited
The Banking Pick

PAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • -14.9% 10Y total return vs PAR's 142.6%
  • Lower P/E (9.0x vs 19.3x)
  • 22.3% margin vs LSPD's -58.0%
  • +24.7% vs PAR's -77.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
PAR
PAR Technology Corporation
The Income Pick

PAR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.54
  • 30.2% revenue growth vs PAX's 2.6%
Best for: income & stability
RSKD
Riskified Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

RSKD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 5.03x
  • Beta 1.05, current ratio 5.03x
  • Beta 1.05 vs LSPD's 1.58
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
LSPD
Lightspeed Commerce Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LSPD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPAR logoPAR30.2% revenue growth vs PAX's 2.6%
ValuePAX logoPAXLower P/E (9.0x vs 19.3x)
Quality / MarginsPAX logoPAX22.3% margin vs LSPD's -58.0%
Stability / SafetyRSKD logoRSKDBeta 1.05 vs LSPD's 1.58
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PAX logoPAX+24.7% vs PAR's -77.0%
Efficiency (ROA)TOST logoTOST10.9% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 30.8% vs -36.8%

TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TOSTToast, Inc.
FY 2024
Technology Service
85.2%$4.1B
License
14.8%$706M
PAXPatria Investments Limited
FY 2023
Advisory and Other Ancillary Fees
100.0%$3M
PARPAR Technology Corporation
FY 2025
Subscription Service
63.9%$291M
Hardware
23.4%$106M
Professional Service
12.7%$58M
RSKDRiskified Ltd.
FY 2024
Fraud Service Revenue
57.5%$188M
Indemnification Service Revenue
42.5%$139M
LSPDLightspeed Commerce Inc.
FY 2025
Transaction Based Revenue
64.8%$697M
Subscription Revenue
32.0%$345M
Hardware And Other Revenue
3.2%$35M

TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPAXLAGGINGLSPD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

TOST is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 17.9x RSKD's $345M. PAX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LSPD's -58.0%. On growth, PAR holds the edge at +23.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.LSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.2B$384M$440M$345M$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$361M$174M-$20M-$27M-$562M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$342M$86M-$85M-$28M-$693M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$608M$236M-$19M$34M$31M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.8%+96.2%+43.9%+51.5%+39.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.8%+34.2%-15.4%-9.8%-58.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.6%+22.3%-19.2%-8.0%-58.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.9%-4.3%+9.9%+2.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.0%+23.2%+6.2%+11.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+190.9%-40.5%+18.2%+2.5%-41.2%
PAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PAX leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 23.9x trailing earnings, PAX trades at a 53% valuation discount to TOST's 50.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PAX's 16.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TOST's 36.3x.

MetricTOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.LSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…
Market CapShares × price$14.8B$2.1B$584M$812M$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13.5B$2.2B$907M$675M$752M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS50.55x23.93x-6.63x-26.39x-2.17x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.84x9.03x26.20x20.47x19.31x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate8.50x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple36.27x16.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.41x5.37x1.28x2.36x1.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.09x3.19x0.68x2.54x0.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.35x24.55x
PAX leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TOST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TOST delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-46 for LSPD. LSPD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PAR's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TOST scores 7/9 vs LSPD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.LSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+16.1%+14.3%-10.1%-8.4%-46.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+10.9%+6.3%-6.1%-6.3%-41.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+30.8%+12.7%-5.5%-22.2%-36.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+15.9%+13.8%-6.8%-7.6%-33.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974353
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.27x0.49x0.08x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.3B$120M$323M-$137M-$541M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.4B$55M$80M$162M$558M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$40M$175M$402M$25M$17M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.45x-9.78x-510.59x
TOST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — TOST and PAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PAX five years ago would be worth $11,399 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,535 for LSPD. Over the past 12 months, PAX leads with a +24.7% total return vs PAR's -77.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOST at 13.5% vs PAR's -22.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.LSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-16.8%-17.9%-61.2%-1.2%-19.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-19.6%+24.7%-77.0%+2.4%-3.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+46.3%+4.7%-53.0%+0.6%-35.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.7%+14.0%-81.6%-81.7%-84.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-54.7%-14.9%+142.6%-81.7%-71.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+13.5%+1.5%-22.3%+0.2%-13.6%
Evenly matched — TOST and PAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

RSKD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

RSKD is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LSPD's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSKD currently trades 83.6% from its 52-week high vs PAR's 19.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.LSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.44x1.09x1.54x1.05x1.58x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$49.66$17.80$72.15$5.68$14.34
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$24.35$10.65$11.59$3.70$8.37
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+57.0%+72.6%+19.2%+83.6%+65.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.954.546.768.052.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9.8M856K1.9M766K833K
RSKD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TOST as "Buy", PAX as "Buy", PAR as "Buy", RSKD as "Buy", LSPD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.5% upside for PAR (target: $25) vs 21.1% for RSKD (target: $6).

MetricTOST logoTOSTToast, Inc.PAX logoPAXPatria Investment…PAR logoPARPAR Technology Co…RSKD logoRSKDRiskified Ltd.LSPD logoLSPDLightspeed Commer…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.76$18.00$25.00$5.75$12.30
# AnalystsCovering analysts295111115
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.7%0.0%0.0%+13.1%+10.2%
PAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

PAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TOST leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallPatria Investments Limited (PAX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TOST vs PAX vs PAR vs RSKD vs LSPD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is the stronger pick with 30.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Patria Investments Limited (PAX). Patria Investments Limited (PAX) offers the better valuation at 23. 9x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Toast, Inc. (TOST) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?

On trailing P/E, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the cheapest at 23.

9x versus Toast, Inc. at 50. 6x. On forward P/E, Patria Investments Limited is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?

Over the past 5 years, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) delivered a total return of +14.

0%, compared to -84. 7% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAR returned +142. 6% versus RSKD's -81. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Riskified Ltd.

(RSKD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Lightspeed Commerce Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning LSPD is approximately 51% more volatile than RSKD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 49% for PAR Technology Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) is pulling ahead at 30.

2% versus 2. 6% for Patria Investments Limited (PAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toast, Inc. grew EPS 1639% year-over-year, compared to -1392. 9% for PAR Technology Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TOST leads at 31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?

Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

3% net margin versus -62. 0% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAX leads at 34. 2% versus -64. 6% for LSPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PAX leads at 96. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) trades at 9.

0x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for PAR Technology Corporation — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAR: 80. 5% to $25. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is TOST or PAX or PAR or RSKD or LSPD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

09)). Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAX: -14. 9%, LSPD: -71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TOST and PAX and PAR and RSKD and LSPD?

These companies operate in different sectors (TOST (Technology) and PAX (Financial Services) and PAR (Technology) and RSKD (Technology) and LSPD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TOST is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; RSKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LSPD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TOST

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PAX

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PAR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RSKD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LSPD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TOST and PAX and PAR and RSKD and LSPD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TOST: 22.0% · PAX: 2.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(TOST: 5.6% · PAX: 22.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TOST: 50.6x · PAX: 23.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.