Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TOYO vs XOM vs CVX vs ITRN vs COP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TOYO
TOYO Co., Ltd.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • JP
Market Cap$364M
5Y Perf.+29.3%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$620.85B
5Y Perf.+25.4%
CVX
Chevron Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$364.18B
5Y Perf.+23.6%
ITRN
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.+147.3%
COP
ConocoPhillips

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$140.02B
5Y Perf.-0.5%

TOYO vs XOM vs CVX vs ITRN vs COP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TOYO logoTOYO
XOM logoXOM
CVX logoCVX
ITRN logoITRN
COP logoCOP
IndustrySolarOil & Gas IntegratedOil & Gas IntegratedCommunication EquipmentOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$364M$620.85B$364.18B$1.38B$140.02B
Revenue (TTM)$178M$323.90B$184.43B$359M$58.31B
Net Income (TTM)$24M$28.84B$12.30B$58M$7.32B
Gross Margin10.3%21.7%30.4%49.7%29.2%
Operating Margin-2.2%10.5%9.0%21.4%18.3%
Forward P/E4.6x14.8x15.0x17.8x13.3x
Total Debt$74M$43.54B$46.74B$5M$23.44B
Cash & Equiv.$14M$10.68B$6.47B$108M$6.50B

TOYO vs XOM vs CVX vs ITRN vs COPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TOYO
XOM
CVX
ITRN
COP
StockJun 24May 26Return
TOYO Co., Ltd. (TOYO)100129.3+29.3%
Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM)100125.4+25.4%
Chevron Corporation (CVX)100123.6+23.6%
Ituran Location and… (ITRN)100247.3+147.3%
ConocoPhillips (COP)10099.5-0.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TOYO vs XOM vs CVX vs ITRN vs COP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TOYO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Ituran Location and Control Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CVX and COP also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TOYO
TOYO Co., Ltd.
The Growth Play

TOYO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 183.8%, EPS growth 316.7%
  • 183.8% revenue growth vs CVX's -4.6%
  • Lower P/E (4.6x vs 17.8x)
  • +260.1% vs COP's +34.7%
Best for: growth exposure
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, XOM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
CVX
Chevron Corporation
The Income Pick

CVX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta -0.05, yield 3.8%
  • 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
ITRN
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
The Long-Run Compounder

ITRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 233.6% 10Y total return vs COP's 233.4%
  • 16.1% margin vs CVX's 6.7%
  • 15.8% ROA vs CVX's 4.2%, ROIC 47.2% vs 6.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
COP
ConocoPhillips
The Defensive Pick

COP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.08, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 1.30x
  • Beta 0.08, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.30x
  • Beta 0.08 vs ITRN's 1.18
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTOYO logoTOYO183.8% revenue growth vs CVX's -4.6%
ValueTOYO logoTOYOLower P/E (4.6x vs 17.8x)
Quality / MarginsITRN logoITRN16.1% margin vs CVX's 6.7%
Stability / SafetyCOP logoCOPBeta 0.08 vs ITRN's 1.18
DividendsCVX logoCVX3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TOYO logoTOYO+260.1% vs COP's +34.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ITRN logoITRN15.8% ROA vs CVX's 4.2%, ROIC 47.2% vs 6.2%

TOYO vs XOM vs CVX vs ITRN vs COP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TOYOTOYO Co., Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

XOMExxon Mobil Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Products
68.7%$217.8B
Upstream
17.6%$55.7B
Chemical Products
6.0%$18.9B
Specialty Products
5.4%$17.3B
Income From Equity Affiliates
1.7%$5.3B
Other Revenue
0.6%$2.1B
CVXChevron Corporation
FY 2025
Downstream
61.1%$72.5B
Upstream
38.4%$45.5B
All Other Segments
0.5%$644M
ITRNIturan Location and Control Ltd.
FY 2021
Telematics Services
70.0%$190M
Telematics Products
30.0%$81M
COPConocoPhillips
FY 2025
Crude oil product line
75.7%$39.1B
Natural Gas Product Line
17.1%$8.9B
Natural Gas Liquids
7.2%$3.7B

TOYO vs XOM vs CVX vs ITRN vs COP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLITRNLAGGINGCOP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ITRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 1819.9x TOYO's $178M. ITRN is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVX's 6.7%. On growth, ITRN holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTOYO logoTOYOTOYO Co., Ltd.XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
RevenueTrailing 12 months$178M$323.9B$184.4B$359M$58.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$20M$59.9B$37.1B$96M$22.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$24M$28.8B$12.3B$58M$7.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M$23.6B$16.2B$71M$18.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.3%+21.7%+30.4%+49.7%+29.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.2%+10.5%+9.0%+21.4%+18.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.7%+8.9%+6.7%+16.1%+12.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.5%+7.3%+8.8%+19.7%+31.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.7%-1.3%-5.3%+12.8%-2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-78.8%-11.0%-24.5%+10.0%-20.2%
ITRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TOYO and COP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 10.8x trailing earnings, TOYO trades at a 61% valuation discount to CVX's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COP's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ITRN's 13.3x.

MetricTOYO logoTOYOTOYO Co., Ltd.XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
Market CapShares × price$364M$620.8B$364.2B$1.4B$140.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$424M$653.7B$404.5B$1.3B$157.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS10.84x21.86x27.53x20.19x18.09x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.57x14.79x15.02x17.84x13.29x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.66x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.08x10.91x10.89x13.33x6.77x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.06x1.92x1.97x3.85x2.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.48x2.37x1.76x5.22x2.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF147.89x26.29x21.95x20.72x8.35x
Evenly matched — TOYO and COP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ITRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

TOYO delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $7 for CVX. ITRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOYO's 1.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ITRN scores 7/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTOYO logoTOYOTOYO Co., Ltd.XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+34.8%+10.7%+7.2%+27.3%+11.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.9%+6.4%+4.2%+15.8%+6.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.3%+8.6%+6.2%+47.2%+10.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.0%+8.9%+6.6%+29.5%+10.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–963576
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.24x0.16x0.24x0.02x0.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$60M$32.9B$40.3B-$103M$16.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$14M$10.7B$6.5B$108M$6.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$74M$43.5B$46.7B$5M$23.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.20x69.44x17.22x32.28x9.42x
ITRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ITRN five years ago would be worth $28,016 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,393 for TOYO. Over the past 12 months, TOYO leads with a +260.1% total return vs COP's +34.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ITRN at 45.2% vs TOYO's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTOYO logoTOYOTOYO Co., Ltd.XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+81.9%+20.3%+18.2%+42.2%+19.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+260.1%+43.9%+39.5%+76.7%+34.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.9%+44.9%+26.7%+206.4%+23.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.9%+164.6%+94.0%+180.2%+131.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.9%+105.0%+135.8%+233.6%+233.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.3%+13.2%+8.2%+45.2%+7.3%
ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — XOM and ITRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ITRN's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs TOYO's 75.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTOYO logoTOYOTOYO Co., Ltd.XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.87x-0.15x-0.05x1.18x0.08x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.33$176.41$214.71$59.84$135.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.99$101.19$133.77$32.71$84.28
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.6%+83.0%+85.0%+98.5%+84.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.842.442.168.343.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded165K18.9M11.0M118K9.6M
Evenly matched — XOM and ITRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: XOM as "Hold", CVX as "Buy", ITRN as "Hold", COP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.1% upside for TOYO (target: $18) vs -5.0% for ITRN (target: $56). For income investors, CVX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.76% vs XOM's 2.73%.

MetricTOYO logoTOYOTOYO Co., Ltd.XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…CVX logoCVXChevron Corporati…ITRN logoITRNIturan Location a…COP logoCOPConocoPhillips
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$160.43$190.93$56.00$127.07
# AnalystsCovering analysts5553552
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+3.8%+3.2%+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises26831
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.00$6.87$1.89$3.19
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.3%+3.3%+0.2%+3.6%
Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ITRN leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallIturan Location and Control… (ITRN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TOYO vs XOM vs CVX vs ITRN vs COP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TOYO or XOM or CVX or ITRN or COP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TOYO Co.

, Ltd. (TOYO) is the stronger pick with 183. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 6% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). TOYO Co. , Ltd. (TOYO) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chevron Corporation (CVX) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TOYO or XOM or CVX or ITRN or COP?

On trailing P/E, TOYO Co.

, Ltd. (TOYO) is the cheapest at 10. 8x versus Chevron Corporation at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, TOYO Co. , Ltd. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TOYO or XOM or CVX or ITRN or COP?

Over the past 5 years, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.

(ITRN) delivered a total return of +180. 2%, compared to +3. 9% for TOYO Co. , Ltd. (TOYO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ITRN returned +233. 6% versus TOYO's +7. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TOYO or XOM or CVX or ITRN or COP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus Ituran Location and Control Ltd. 's 1. 18β — meaning ITRN is approximately -905% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 124% for TOYO Co. , Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TOYO or XOM or CVX or ITRN or COP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TOYO Co.

, Ltd. (TOYO) is pulling ahead at 183. 8% versus -4. 6% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TOYO Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 316. 7% year-over-year, compared to -31. 8% for Chevron Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITRN leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TOYO or XOM or CVX or ITRN or COP?

TOYO Co.

, Ltd. (TOYO) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 1% net margin versus 6. 7% for Chevron Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITRN leads at 21. 4% versus 5. 2% for TOYO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITRN leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TOYO or XOM or CVX or ITRN or COP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TOYO Co.

, Ltd. (TOYO) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 17. 8x for Ituran Location and Control Ltd. — 13. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TOYO: 66. 1% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TOYO or XOM or CVX or ITRN or COP?

In this comparison, CVX (3.

8% yield), ITRN (3. 2% yield), COP (2. 8% yield), XOM (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. TOYO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TOYO or XOM or CVX or ITRN or COP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, TOYO: +7. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TOYO and XOM and CVX and ITRN and COP?

These companies operate in different sectors (TOYO (Energy) and XOM (Energy) and CVX (Energy) and ITRN (Technology) and COP (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TOYO is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; COP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. XOM, CVX, ITRN, COP pay a dividend while TOYO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TOYO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XOM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CVX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ITRN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TOYO and XOM and CVX and ITRN and COP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TOYO: 0.7% · XOM: -1.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(TOYO: 13.7% · XOM: 8.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TOYO: 10.8x · XOM: 21.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.