Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TSCO vs CASY vs WMT vs MUSA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$16.71B
5Y Perf.+30.1%
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31.59B
5Y Perf.+432.7%
WMT
Walmart Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.04T
5Y Perf.+214.9%
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.75B
5Y Perf.+400.6%

TSCO vs CASY vs WMT vs MUSA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TSCO logoTSCO
CASY logoCASY
WMT logoWMT
MUSA logoMUSA
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$16.71B$31.59B$1.04T$10.75B
Revenue (TTM)$15.65B$16.98B$703.06B$19.68B
Net Income (TTM)$1.08B$650M$22.91B$554M
Gross Margin32.5%23.9%24.9%5.5%
Operating Margin9.3%6.3%4.1%4.3%
Forward P/E14.9x47.1x44.7x19.8x
Total Debt$5.94B$2.96B$67.09B$3.25B
Cash & Equiv.$194M$327M$10.73B$29M

TSCO vs CASY vs WMT vs MUSALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TSCO
CASY
WMT
MUSA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Tractor Supply Comp… (TSCO)100130.1+30.1%
Casey's General Sto… (CASY)100532.7+432.7%
Walmart Inc. (WMT)100314.9+214.9%
Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA)100500.6+400.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TSCO vs CASY vs WMT vs MUSA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TSCO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Casey's General Stores, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. WMT and MUSA also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TSCO
Tractor Supply Company
The Value Pick

TSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency and defensive.

  • PEG 1.48 vs WMT's 4.06
  • Beta 0.57, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.34x
  • Lower P/E (14.9x vs 19.8x), PEG 1.48 vs 1.53
  • 6.9% margin vs MUSA's 2.8%
Best for: valuation efficiency and defensive
CASY
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
The Growth Play

CASY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
  • 7.3% revenue growth vs MUSA's -4.2%
  • +83.1% vs TSCO's -35.9%
Best for: growth exposure
WMT
Walmart Inc.
The Income Pick

WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
  • Beta 0.12 vs TSCO's 0.57, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MUSA
Murphy USA Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MUSA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 8.0% 10Y total return vs CASY's 6.4%
  • 11.7% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 14.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCASY logoCASY7.3% revenue growth vs MUSA's -4.2%
ValueTSCO logoTSCOLower P/E (14.9x vs 19.8x), PEG 1.48 vs 1.53
Quality / MarginsTSCO logoTSCO6.9% margin vs MUSA's 2.8%
Stability / SafetyWMT logoWMTBeta 0.12 vs TSCO's 0.57, lower leverage
DividendsTSCO logoTSCO2.9% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%
Momentum (1Y)CASY logoCASY+83.1% vs TSCO's -35.9%
Efficiency (ROA)MUSA logoMUSA11.7% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 15.8% vs 14.7%

TSCO vs CASY vs WMT vs MUSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TSCOTractor Supply Company
FY 2025
Companion Animal
100.0%$3.7B
CASYCasey's General Stores, Inc.
FY 2020
Gasoline
60.5%$5.5B
Grocery And Other Merchandise
27.4%$2.5B
Prepared Food And Fountain
12.0%$1.1B
WMTWalmart Inc.
FY 2025
Walmart U S
68.6%$462.4B
Walmart International
18.1%$121.9B
Sams Club
13.4%$90.2B
MUSAMurphy USA Inc.
FY 2025
Product
76.7%$14.9B
Merchandise
22.2%$4.3B
Product and Service, Other
1.1%$217M

TSCO vs CASY vs WMT vs MUSA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTSCOLAGGINGWMT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 44.9x TSCO's $15.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.9% (TSCO) to 2.8% (MUSA). On growth, MUSA holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTSCO logoTSCOTractor Supply Co…CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15.6B$17.0B$703.1B$19.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.0B$1.5B$42.8B$1.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.1B$650M$22.9B$554M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$585M$667M$15.3B$555M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.5%+23.9%+24.9%+5.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.3%+6.3%+4.1%+4.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.9%+3.8%+3.3%+2.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.7%+3.9%+2.2%+2.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.6%+0.3%+5.8%+6.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.8%+49.8%+35.1%+176.8%
TSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.4x trailing earnings, TSCO trades at a 73% valuation discount to CASY's 58.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TSCO offers better value at 1.53x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricTSCO logoTSCOTractor Supply Co…CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.
Market CapShares × price$16.7B$31.6B$1.04T$10.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$22.5B$34.2B$1.09T$14.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.41x58.13x47.69x24.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.87x47.05x44.71x19.84x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.53x3.73x4.33x1.85x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.45x28.51x24.85x13.71x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.08x1.98x1.46x0.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.54x9.06x10.45x18.20x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.56x54.03x24.97x28.73x
TSCO leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MUSA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MUSA delivers a 89.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $90 in annual profit, vs $22 for WMT. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MUSA's 5.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASY scores 6/9 vs MUSA's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTSCO logoTSCOTractor Supply Co…CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+42.6%+23.7%+22.3%+89.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.8%+10.0%+7.9%+11.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.0%+11.3%+14.7%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+18.6%+12.5%+17.5%+20.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95665
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.30x0.84x0.67x5.22x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.7B$2.6B$56.4B$3.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$194M$327M$10.7B$29M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.9B$3.0B$67.1B$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense21.16x13.45x11.85x7.47x
MUSA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CASY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MUSA five years ago would be worth $41,821 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,120 for TSCO. Over the past 12 months, CASY leads with a +83.1% total return vs TSCO's -35.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CASY at 55.0% vs TSCO's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTSCO logoTSCOTractor Supply Co…CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-37.1%+53.2%+15.7%+43.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-35.9%+83.1%+32.7%+15.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-28.5%+272.4%+160.5%+106.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-8.8%+285.1%+186.9%+318.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+96.3%+638.3%+499.5%+803.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-10.6%+55.0%+37.6%+27.2%
CASY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CASY and MUSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MUSA is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSCO's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASY currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs TSCO's 49.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTSCO logoTSCOTractor Supply Co…CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.57x0.29x0.12x-0.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$63.99$867.40$134.69$609.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$31.40$430.00$91.89$345.23
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+49.6%+98.1%+96.7%+95.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10017.876.855.964.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8.2M545K17.2M354K
Evenly matched — CASY and MUSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TSCO and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: TSCO as "Buy", CASY as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", MUSA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 77.3% upside for TSCO (target: $56) vs -19.1% for CASY (target: $688). For income investors, TSCO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.89% vs CASY's 0.23%.

MetricTSCO logoTSCOTractor Supply Co…CASY logoCASYCasey's General S…WMT logoWMTWalmart Inc.MUSA logoMUSAMurphy USA Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$56.27$688.10$137.04$504.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts50256411
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%+0.2%+0.7%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1619375
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.92$1.94$0.94$2.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.2%+0.0%+0.8%+6.0%
Evenly matched — TSCO and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TSCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MUSA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallTractor Supply Company (TSCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TSCO vs CASY vs WMT vs MUSA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TSCO or CASY or WMT or MUSA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Casey's General Stores, Inc.

(CASY) is the stronger pick with 7. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 2% for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TSCO or CASY or WMT or MUSA?

On trailing P/E, Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) is the cheapest at 15.

4x versus Casey's General Stores, Inc. at 58. 1x. On forward P/E, Tractor Supply Company is actually cheaper at 14. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Tractor Supply Company wins at 1. 48x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TSCO or CASY or WMT or MUSA?

Over the past 5 years, Murphy USA Inc.

(MUSA) delivered a total return of +318. 2%, compared to -8. 8% for Tractor Supply Company (TSCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MUSA returned +803. 3% versus TSCO's +96. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TSCO or CASY or WMT or MUSA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Murphy USA Inc.

(MUSA) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 23β versus Tractor Supply Company's 0. 57β — meaning TSCO is approximately -346% more volatile than MUSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 5% for Murphy USA Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TSCO or CASY or WMT or MUSA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Casey's General Stores, Inc.

(CASY) is pulling ahead at 7. 3% versus -4. 2% for Murphy USA Inc. (MUSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to -0. 0% for Murphy USA Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CASY leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TSCO or CASY or WMT or MUSA?

Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

1% net margin versus 2. 4% for Murphy USA Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSCO leads at 9. 5% versus 3. 8% for MUSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSCO leads at 33. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TSCO or CASY or WMT or MUSA more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 48x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 47. 1x for Casey's General Stores, Inc. — 32. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TSCO: 77. 3% to $56. 27.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TSCO or CASY or WMT or MUSA?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 2% for Casey's General Stores, Inc. (CASY).

09

Is TSCO or CASY or WMT or MUSA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Murphy USA Inc.

(MUSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 23), +803. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MUSA: +803. 3%, TSCO: +96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TSCO and CASY and WMT and MUSA?

These companies operate in different sectors (TSCO (Consumer Cyclical) and CASY (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and MUSA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TSCO is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CASY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; MUSA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TSCO, WMT pay a dividend while CASY, MUSA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TSCO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CASY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WMT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MUSA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TSCO and CASY and WMT and MUSA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TSCO: 3.6% · CASY: 0.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(TSCO: 6.9% · CASY: 3.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TSCO: 15.4x · CASY: 58.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.