Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.92B | $108.10B | $73.68B | $2.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $12.26B | $14.92B | $2.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $4.34B | $4.42B | $65M |
| Gross Margin | 92.2% | 86.3% | 84.5% | 34.4% |
| Operating Margin | -17.7% | 39.0% | 24.3% | -1.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.2x | 15.3x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $3.88B | $2.71B | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $320M | $5.09B | $3.12B | $801M |
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taysha Gene Therapi… (TSHA) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 156.2 | +56.2% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
| Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT) | 100 | 14.8 | -85.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TSHA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 5.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 57.5%
- 17.3% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
- +251.1% vs SRPT's -43.4%
VRTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 382.6% 10Y total return vs REGN's 90.0%
- 35.4% margin vs TSHA's -17.4%
- 17.1% ROA vs TSHA's -40.2%
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 0.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- PEG 2.43 vs VRTX's 2.68
- Beta 0.81, yield 0.5%, current ratio 4.13x
SRPT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.3x vs 22.2x), PEG 2.43 vs 2.68 | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs TSHA's -17.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs TSHA's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +251.1% vs SRPT's -43.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.1% ROA vs TSHA's -40.2% |
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
TSHA leads 1 • REGN leads 0 • SRPT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.9B annually — 1997.0x TSHA's $7M. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TSHA's -17.4%. On growth, REGN holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $12.3B | $14.9B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | $4.9B | $4.2B | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | $4.3B | $4.4B | $65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$112M | $3.7B | $4.2B | $107M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.2% | +86.3% | +84.5% | +34.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.7% | +39.0% | +24.3% | -1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.4% | +35.4% | +29.6% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.0% | +30.3% | +27.9% | +4.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +7.8% | +19.0% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.2% | +61.4% | -7.2% | +162.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — REGN and SRPT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 38% valuation discount to VRTX's 27.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), REGN offers better value at 2.70x vs VRTX's 3.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $108.1B | $73.7B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $106.9B | $73.3B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.62x | 27.74x | 17.09x | -2.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.18x | 15.35x | 6.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.35x | 2.70x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.52x | 17.78x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 196.11x | 8.95x | 5.14x | 0.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.64x | 5.87x | 2.46x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.85x | 18.06x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX delivers a 23.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-56 for TSHA. TSHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SRPT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REGN scores 5/9 vs SRPT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -56.1% | +23.9% | +14.3% | +4.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.2% | +17.1% | +11.1% | +1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +23.0% | +8.9% | -31.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.0% | +23.1% | +10.2% | -24.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.21x | 0.09x | 0.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$302M | -$1.2B | -$412M | $238M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $320M | $5.1B | $3.1B | $801M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $3.9B | $2.7B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2510.94x | 488.09x | 108.44x | -14.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSHA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRTX five years ago would be worth $19,767 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,789 for SRPT. Over the past 12 months, TSHA leads with a +251.1% total return vs SRPT's -43.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSHA at 111.0% vs SRPT's -45.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.0% | -6.0% | -8.5% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +251.1% | -2.3% | +27.1% | -43.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +839.4% | +23.5% | -5.1% | -83.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | +97.7% | +43.6% | -72.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +382.6% | +90.0% | +18.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +111.0% | +7.3% | -1.7% | -45.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TSHA and REGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSHA's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSHA currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs SRPT's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.06x | 0.82x | 0.81x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.30 | $507.92 | $821.11 | $44.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.85 | $362.50 | $476.49 | $10.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +83.7% | +86.4% | +47.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.0 | 43.2 | 44.9 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 1.2M | 631K | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TSHA as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", SRPT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.5% upside for TSHA (target: $11) vs 18.4% for SRPT (target: $25). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.17 | $552.27 | $865.68 | $24.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 56 | 48 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +5.4% | +1.1% |
VRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TSHA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc.
(TSHA) is the stronger pick with 17. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated at 27. 7x. On forward P/E, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. wins at 2. 43x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 68x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT?
Over the past 5 years, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) delivered a total return of +97.
7%, compared to -72. 1% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTX returned +382. 6% versus TSHA's -72. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning TSHA is approximately 155% more volatile than REGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 91% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc.
(TSHA) is pulling ahead at 17. 3% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSHA leads at 57. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus -1115. 3% for Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus -1130. 6% for TSHA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSHA leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 43x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 68x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TSHA: 67. 5% to $11. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. TSHA, VRTX, SRPT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
82), +382. 6% 10Y return). Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRTX: +382. 6%, TSHA: -72. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TSHA and VRTX and REGN and SRPT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TSHA is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.