Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT vs ALNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT vs ALNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.92B | $108.10B | $73.68B | $2.18B | $39.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $12.26B | $14.92B | $2.18B | $4.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-130M | $4.34B | $4.42B | $65M | $577M |
| Gross Margin | 92.2% | 86.3% | 84.5% | 34.4% | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | -17.7% | 39.0% | 24.3% | -1.9% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.2x | 15.3x | 6.9x | 44.2x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $3.88B | $2.71B | $1.04B | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $320M | $5.09B | $3.12B | $801M | $1.66B |
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT vs ALNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taysha Gene Therapi… (TSHA) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 156.2 | +56.2% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
| Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT) | 100 | 14.8 | -85.2% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 203.2 | +103.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT vs ALNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TSHA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +251.1% vs SRPT's -43.4%
VRTX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 35.4% margin vs TSHA's -17.4%
- 17.1% ROA vs TSHA's -40.2%
REGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- PEG 2.43 vs VRTX's 2.68
- Beta 0.81, yield 0.5%, current ratio 4.13x
- Lower P/E (15.3x vs 44.2x)
Among these 5 stocks, SRPT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ALNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.71
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 411.9% 10Y total return vs VRTX's 382.6%
- 65.2% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.2% revenue growth vs REGN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.3x vs 44.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs TSHA's -17.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs TSHA's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +251.1% vs SRPT's -43.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.1% ROA vs TSHA's -40.2% |
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT vs ALNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT vs ALNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
TSHA leads 1 • REGN leads 0 • SRPT leads 0 • ALNY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRTX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.9B annually — 1997.0x TSHA's $7M. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TSHA's -17.4%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $12.3B | $14.9B | $2.2B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$132M | $4.9B | $4.2B | -$6M | $677M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$130M | $4.3B | $4.4B | $65M | $577M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$112M | $3.7B | $4.2B | $107M | $641M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.2% | +86.3% | +84.5% | +34.4% | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.7% | +39.0% | +24.3% | -1.9% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.4% | +35.4% | +29.6% | +3.0% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.0% | +30.3% | +27.9% | +4.9% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +7.8% | +19.0% | -1.9% | +96.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.2% | +61.4% | -7.2% | +162.6% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — REGN and SRPT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 87% valuation discount to ALNY's 127.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), REGN offers better value at 2.70x vs VRTX's 3.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $108.1B | $73.7B | $2.2B | $39.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $106.9B | $73.3B | $2.4B | $39.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.62x | 27.74x | 17.09x | -2.92x | 127.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.18x | 15.35x | 6.93x | 44.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.35x | 2.70x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.52x | 17.78x | — | 70.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 196.11x | 8.95x | 5.14x | 0.99x | 10.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.64x | 5.87x | 2.46x | 1.91x | 50.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.85x | 18.06x | — | 84.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-56 for TSHA. TSHA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs SRPT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -56.1% | +23.9% | +14.3% | +4.9% | +98.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.2% | +17.1% | +11.1% | +1.9% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +23.0% | +8.9% | -31.4% | +33.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.0% | +23.1% | +10.2% | -24.0% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.21x | 0.09x | 0.91x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$302M | -$1.2B | -$412M | $238M | -$379M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $320M | $5.1B | $3.1B | $801M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $3.9B | $2.7B | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2510.94x | 488.09x | 108.44x | -14.00x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSHA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,789 for SRPT. Over the past 12 months, TSHA leads with a +251.1% total return vs SRPT's -43.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSHA at 111.0% vs SRPT's -45.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.0% | -6.0% | -8.5% | -2.4% | -26.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +251.1% | -2.3% | +27.1% | -43.4% | +7.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +839.4% | +23.5% | -5.1% | -83.6% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | +97.7% | +43.6% | -72.1% | +125.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +382.6% | +90.0% | +18.0% | +411.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +111.0% | +7.3% | -1.7% | -45.3% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TSHA and ALNY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSHA's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSHA currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs SRPT's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.06x | 0.82x | 0.81x | 2.02x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.30 | $507.92 | $821.11 | $44.14 | $495.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.85 | $362.50 | $476.49 | $10.42 | $245.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.4% | +83.7% | +86.4% | +47.1% | +59.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.0 | 43.2 | 44.9 | 63.4 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 1.2M | 631K | 3.0M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TSHA as "Buy", VRTX as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", SRPT as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.5% upside for TSHA (target: $11) vs 18.4% for SRPT (target: $25). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.17 | $552.27 | $865.68 | $24.63 | $445.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 56 | 48 | 54 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% | +5.4% | +1.1% | 0.0% |
VRTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TSHA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TSHA vs VRTX vs REGN vs SRPT vs ALNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT or ALNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT or ALNY?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 127. 0x. On forward P/E, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. wins at 2. 43x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 68x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT or ALNY?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +125. 4%, compared to -72. 1% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALNY returned +411. 9% versus TSHA's -72. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT or ALNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning TSHA is approximately 191% more volatile than ALNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT or ALNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated grew EPS 836. 5% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TSHA leads at 57. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT or ALNY?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
7% net margin versus -1115. 3% for Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39. 4% versus -1130. 6% for TSHA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSHA leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT or ALNY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 43x versus Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's 2. 68x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 2x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 37. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TSHA: 67. 5% to $11. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT or ALNY?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. TSHA, VRTX, SRPT, ALNY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TSHA or VRTX or REGN or SRPT or ALNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +411. 9% 10Y return). Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc. (TSHA) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALNY: +411. 9%, TSHA: -72. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TSHA and VRTX and REGN and SRPT and ALNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TSHA is a small-cap high-growth stock; VRTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.