Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK vs IBEX vs EXLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK vs IBEX vs EXLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $132M | $272M | $581M | $435M | $4.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.10B | $3.04B | $1.21B | $627M | $2.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-201M | $-170M | $105M | $47M | $252M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | 18.1% | 35.5% | 21.3% | 38.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 4.2% | 11.6% | 9.2% | 15.2% |
| Forward P/E | 2.2x | — | 4.9x | 9.2x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.00B | $789M | $298M | $70M | $404M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $233M | $212M | $15M | $146M |
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK vs IBEX vs EXLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| Conduent Incorporat… (CNDT) | 100 | 23.5 | -76.5% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 18.8 | -81.2% |
| IBEX Limited (IBEX) | 100 | 165.6 | +65.6% |
| ExlService Holdings… (EXLS) | 100 | 146.3 | +46.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK vs IBEX vs EXLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTEC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (2.2x vs 13.9x)
CNDT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.6% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
TASK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- PEG 0.20 vs EXLS's 0.57
- 19.0% revenue growth vs CNDT's -9.4%
IBEX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74
- +26.0% vs TTEC's -32.3%
- 16.4% ROA vs TTEC's -14.2%, ROIC 19.5% vs 6.2%
EXLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 218.8% 10Y total return vs IBEX's 109.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 44.2%, current ratio 2.56x
- Beta 0.64, current ratio 2.56x
- 11.7% margin vs TTEC's -9.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs CNDT's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.2x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.7% margin vs TTEC's -9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs TTEC's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.0% vs TTEC's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.4% ROA vs TTEC's -14.2%, ROIC 19.5% vs 6.2% |
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK vs IBEX vs EXLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK vs IBEX vs EXLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBEX leads in 2 of 6 categories
EXLS leads 1 • TTEC leads 0 • CNDT leads 0 • TASK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 4.9x IBEX's $627M. EXLS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTEC's -9.6%. On growth, IBEX holds the edge at +16.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $3.0B | $1.2B | $627M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $178M | $321M | $204M | $76M | $410M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$201M | -$170M | $105M | $47M | $252M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $102M | -$147M | $88M | $32M | $297M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +18.1% | +35.5% | +21.3% | +38.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +4.2% | +11.6% | +9.2% | +15.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | -5.6% | +8.7% | +7.5% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | -4.8% | +7.3% | +5.2% | +13.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.1% | -3.8% | +10.3% | +16.8% | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.6% | -146.0% | +13.0% | +21.9% | +7.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TTEC and CNDT each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 71% valuation discount to EXLS's 20.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TASK offers better value at 0.23x vs EXLS's 0.83x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $132M | $272M | $581M | $435M | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $828M | $667M | $490M | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.68x | -1.54x | 5.86x | 13.70x | 20.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.24x | — | 4.89x | 9.18x | 13.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.23x | 0.34x | 0.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.67x | 2.51x | 3.30x | 7.67x | 13.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 0.09x | 0.49x | 0.78x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 0.34x | 1.00x | 3.79x | 5.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.62x | — | 7.89x | 15.95x | 16.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBEX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBEX delivers a 31.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-100 for TTEC. EXLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTEC's 8.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TASK scores 7/9 vs CNDT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -99.6% | -20.6% | +21.2% | +31.8% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.2% | -7.1% | +10.3% | +16.4% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +7.2% | +16.3% | +19.5% | +20.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +7.6% | +16.7% | +22.4% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.86x | 0.95x | 0.50x | 0.52x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $917M | $556M | $86M | $54M | $257M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $233M | $212M | $15M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $789M | $298M | $70M | $404M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.22x | -1.85x | 7.12x | 62.30x | 11.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBEX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXLS five years ago would be worth $15,849 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $521 for TTEC. Over the past 12 months, IBEX leads with a +26.0% total return vs TTEC's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBEX at 20.0% vs TTEC's -53.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -24.1% | -7.4% | -11.6% | -11.0% | -24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -32.3% | -20.0% | -29.8% | +26.0% | -31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | -38.7% | -17.5% | +73.0% | +3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -75.9% | -67.5% | +36.0% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.1% | -89.0% | -67.5% | +109.9% | +218.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.5% | -15.0% | -6.2% | +20.0% | +1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBEX and EXLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTEC's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBEX currently trades 75.2% from its 52-week high vs TASK's 35.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.65x | 1.23x | 0.74x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.60 | $2.98 | $18.39 | $42.99 | $48.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.98 | $1.15 | $5.89 | $25.42 | $26.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.4% | +59.1% | +35.0% | +75.2% | +64.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 70.6 | 37.6 | 72.3 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 672K | 1.2M | 700K | 119K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CNDT and IBEX each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTEC as "Hold", CNDT as "Hold", TASK as "Buy", IBEX as "Hold", EXLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1160.9% upside for TTEC (target: $34) vs -25.8% for IBEX (target: $24). CNDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.59% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.17 | — | $10.50 | $24.00 | $40.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.6% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.06 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.7% | +4.8% | +17.9% | +6.8% |
IBEX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). EXLS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
TTEC vs CNDT vs TASK vs IBEX vs EXLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTEC or CNDT or TASK or IBEX or EXLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (4. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTEC or CNDT or TASK or IBEX or EXLS?
On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. at 20. 2x. On forward P/E, TTEC Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TaskUs, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTEC or CNDT or TASK or IBEX or EXLS?
Over the past 5 years, ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) delivered a total return of +58. 5%, compared to -94. 8% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +218. 8% versus CNDT's -89. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTEC or CNDT or TASK or IBEX or EXLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 64β versus TTEC Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning TTEC is approximately 184% more volatile than EXLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ExlService Holdings, Inc. (EXLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 9% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTEC or CNDT or TASK or IBEX or EXLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -9. 4% for Conduent Incorporated (CNDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to -151. 1% for Conduent Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXLS leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTEC or CNDT or TASK or IBEX or EXLS?
ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus -9. 0% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXLS leads at 15. 0% versus 4. 5% for TTEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXLS leads at 38. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTEC or CNDT or TASK or IBEX or EXLS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) trades at 2. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 9x for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTEC: 1160. 9% to $34. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTEC or CNDT or TASK or IBEX or EXLS?
In this comparison, CNDT (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. TTEC, TASK, IBEX, EXLS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TTEC or CNDT or TASK or IBEX or EXLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), +218. 8% 10Y return). TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXLS: +218. 8%, TTEC: -63. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTEC and CNDT and TASK and IBEX and EXLS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TTEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNDT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBEX is a small-cap deep-value stock; EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CNDT pays a dividend while TTEC, TASK, IBEX, EXLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.