Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TWLO vs BAND vs ZCMD vs MSGM vs SPOK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TWLO
Twilio Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$29.63B
5Y Perf.-45.6%
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.52B
5Y Perf.-73.4%
ZCMD
Zhongchao Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-98.4%
MSGM
Motorsport Games Inc.

Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.-98.5%
SPOK
Spok Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$225M
5Y Perf.-2.2%

TWLO vs BAND vs ZCMD vs MSGM vs SPOK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TWLO logoTWLO
BAND logoBAND
ZCMD logoZCMD
MSGM logoMSGM
SPOK logoSPOK
IndustryInternet Content & InformationSoftware - InfrastructureMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesElectronic Gaming & MultimediaMedical - Healthcare Information Services
Market Cap$29.63B$1.52B$8M$22M$225M
Revenue (TTM)$5.30B$209.36B$27M$11M$103M
Net Income (TTM)$104M$4.11B$-7M$7M$11M
Gross Margin48.8%37.3%51.0%81.5%91.4%
Operating Margin4.7%-2.2%-24.0%14.5%13.2%
Forward P/E36.1x26.6x3.1x16.5x
Total Debt$1.08B$701M$26K$18K$7M
Cash & Equiv.$682M$103M$8M$5M$25M

TWLO vs BAND vs ZCMD vs MSGM vs SPOKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TWLO
BAND
ZCMD
MSGM
SPOK
StockJan 21May 26Return
Twilio Inc. (TWLO)10054.4-45.6%
Bandwidth Inc. (BAND)10026.6-73.4%
Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD)1001.6-98.4%
Motorsport Games In… (MSGM)1001.5-98.5%
Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK)10097.8-2.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TWLO vs BAND vs ZCMD vs MSGM vs SPOK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MSGM leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Spok Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. BAND also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TWLO
Twilio Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs SPOK's 13.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.
The Momentum Pick

BAND ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +288.6% vs ZCMD's -74.7%
Best for: momentum
ZCMD
Zhongchao Inc.
The Defensive Pick

ZCMD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 11.11x
  • Beta 1.21, current ratio 11.11x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
MSGM
Motorsport Games Inc.
The Growth Play

MSGM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 252.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
  • 30.0% revenue growth vs ZCMD's -28.3%
  • Lower P/E (3.1x vs 16.5x)
  • 61.3% margin vs ZCMD's -25.5%
Best for: growth exposure
SPOK
Spok Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

SPOK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
  • Beta 0.42 vs BAND's 1.86, lower leverage
  • 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMSGM logoMSGM30.0% revenue growth vs ZCMD's -28.3%
ValueMSGM logoMSGMLower P/E (3.1x vs 16.5x)
Quality / MarginsMSGM logoMSGM61.3% margin vs ZCMD's -25.5%
Stability / SafetySPOK logoSPOKBeta 0.42 vs BAND's 1.86, lower leverage
DividendsSPOK logoSPOK11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BAND logoBAND+288.6% vs ZCMD's -74.7%
Efficiency (ROA)MSGM logoMSGM76.4% ROA vs ZCMD's -27.7%, ROIC 81.5% vs -30.1%

TWLO vs BAND vs ZCMD vs MSGM vs SPOK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TWLOTwilio Inc.
FY 2025
Messaging
73.3%$2.9B
Other Communications
19.0%$747M
Segment
7.7%$303M
BANDBandwidth Inc.
FY 2025
CPaaS, Usage-Based Fees
73.8%$415M
CPaaS, Service Fees
26.2%$147M
ZCMDZhongchao Inc.
FY 2025
Service
93.9%$11M
Product
6.1%$696,442
MSGMMotorsport Games Inc.
FY 2025
Gaming
99.3%$11M
Esports
0.7%$83,170
SPOKSpok Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Wireless Operations
28.2%$73M
Paging
26.6%$69M
Software Operations
26.1%$67M
License and Maintenance
14.2%$36M
License
2.9%$7M
Product and Service, Other
1.5%$4M
Hardware
0.5%$1M

TWLO vs BAND vs ZCMD vs MSGM vs SPOK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMSGMLAGGINGZCMD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MSGM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 18531.2x MSGM's $11M. MSGM is the more profitable business, keeping 61.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZCMD's -25.5%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.ZCMD logoZCMDZhongchao Inc.MSGM logoMSGMMotorsport Games …SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.3B$209.4B$27M$11M$103M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$415M-$4.6B-$6M$3M$17M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$104M$4.1B-$7M$7M$11M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.0B$1.8B-$4M$4M$26M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.8%+37.3%+51.0%+81.5%+91.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.7%-2.2%-24.0%+14.5%+13.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.0%+2.0%-25.5%+61.3%+10.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.0%+0.8%-14.0%+33.3%+24.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.0%+1197.2%-23.2%+94.9%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.8%+39.8%-20.3%+112.5%-64.0%
MSGM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BAND and ZCMD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.1x trailing earnings, MSGM trades at a 100% valuation discount to TWLO's 931.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MSGM's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 76.6x.

MetricTWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.ZCMD logoZCMDZhongchao Inc.MSGM logoMSGMMotorsport Games …SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
Market CapShares × price$29.6B$1.5B$8M$22M$225M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$30.0B$2.1B-$571,105$17M$207M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS931.33x-110.07x-1.26x3.14x14.49x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.36.05x26.62x16.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple76.59x49.40x6.07x8.95x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.85x2.01x0.66x1.92x1.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.00x3.55x0.35x2.87x1.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF28.69x0.02x10.83x5.35x8.94x
Evenly matched — BAND and ZCMD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MSGM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MSGM delivers a 129.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $130 in annual profit, vs $-30 for ZCMD. ZCMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 7/9 vs ZCMD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.ZCMD logoZCMDZhongchao Inc.MSGM logoMSGMMotorsport Games …SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+1.3%+4.0%-30.5%+129.7%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+1.7%-27.7%+76.4%+5.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.6%-1.2%-30.1%+81.5%+11.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.9%-1.6%-26.3%+33.3%+12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973366
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.14x1.75x0.00x0.00x0.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$399M$598M-$8M-$5M-$18M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$682M$103M$8M$5M$25M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.1B$701M$26,083$17,575$7M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-10.30x87.32x
MSGM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,329 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $165 for ZCMD. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +288.6% total return vs ZCMD's -74.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 60.2% vs ZCMD's -70.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.ZCMD logoZCMDZhongchao Inc.MSGM logoMSGMMotorsport Games …SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+41.4%+232.8%-39.6%+47.7%-14.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+89.8%+288.6%-74.7%+74.7%-26.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+273.5%+311.2%-97.3%-9.8%+13.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-41.7%-60.2%-98.4%-98.0%+63.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+579.3%+136.6%-99.3%-98.7%+13.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+55.1%+60.2%-70.0%-3.4%+4.3%
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TWLO and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SPOK is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAND's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWLO currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs ZCMD's 19.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.ZCMD logoZCMDZhongchao Inc.MSGM logoMSGMMotorsport Games …SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.51x1.86x1.21x0.95x0.42x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$196.37$48.75$12.18$5.41$19.31
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$91.84$11.93$0.43$2.11$9.96
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.6%+97.1%+19.1%+83.0%+56.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10081.493.164.958.638.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.2M641K15K81K185K
Evenly matched — TWLO and SPOK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SPOK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TWLO as "Buy", BAND as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for SPOK (target: $15) vs -5.3% for TWLO (target: $185). SPOK is the only dividend payer here at 11.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTWLO logoTWLOTwilio Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.ZCMD logoZCMDZhongchao Inc.MSGM logoMSGMMotorsport Games …SPOK logoSPOKSpok Holdings, In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$185.17$46.00$15.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts52151
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+11.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.29
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.9%0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.3%
SPOK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MSGM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BAND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallMotorsport Games Inc. (MSGM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TWLO vs BAND vs ZCMD vs MSGM vs SPOK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TWLO or BAND or ZCMD or MSGM or SPOK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Motorsport Games Inc.

(MSGM) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 3% for Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD). Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM) offers the better valuation at 3. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Twilio Inc. (TWLO) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TWLO or BAND or ZCMD or MSGM or SPOK?

On trailing P/E, Motorsport Games Inc.

(MSGM) is the cheapest at 3. 1x versus Twilio Inc. at 931. 3x. On forward P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TWLO or BAND or ZCMD or MSGM or SPOK?

Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.

(SPOK) delivered a total return of +63. 3%, compared to -98. 4% for Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +579. 3% versus ZCMD's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TWLO or BAND or ZCMD or MSGM or SPOK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spok Holdings, Inc.

(SPOK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Bandwidth Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning BAND is approximately 342% more volatile than SPOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TWLO or BAND or ZCMD or MSGM or SPOK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Motorsport Games Inc.

(MSGM) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus -28. 3% for Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Motorsport Games Inc. grew EPS 252. 1% year-over-year, compared to -92. 7% for Zhongchao Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWLO leads at 9. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TWLO or BAND or ZCMD or MSGM or SPOK?

Motorsport Games Inc.

(MSGM) is the more profitable company, earning 61. 3% net margin versus -55. 5% for Zhongchao Inc. — meaning it keeps 61. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSGM leads at 14. 5% versus -54. 4% for ZCMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSGM leads at 81. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TWLO or BAND or ZCMD or MSGM or SPOK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Spok Holdings, Inc.

(SPOK) trades at 16. 5x forward P/E versus 36. 1x for Twilio Inc. — 19. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPOK: 38. 0% to $15. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TWLO or BAND or ZCMD or MSGM or SPOK?

In this comparison, SPOK (11.

9% yield) pays a dividend. TWLO, BAND, ZCMD, MSGM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TWLO or BAND or ZCMD or MSGM or SPOK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.

(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 11. 9% yield). Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 1%, BAND: +136. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TWLO and BAND and ZCMD and MSGM and SPOK?

These companies operate in different sectors (TWLO (Communication Services) and BAND (Technology) and ZCMD (Healthcare) and MSGM (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BAND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZCMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSGM is a small-cap high-growth stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock. SPOK pays a dividend while TWLO, BAND, ZCMD, MSGM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TWLO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BAND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 59862%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ZCMD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MSGM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 47%
  • Net Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPOK

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TWLO and BAND and ZCMD and MSGM and SPOK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TWLO: 20.0% · BAND: 119724.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.