Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UAL vs DAL vs AAL vs LUV vs ALK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
UAL vs DAL vs AAL vs LUV vs ALK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $32.48B | $47.89B | $8.54B | $20.38B | $4.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $60.47B | $63.36B | $55.99B | $28.88B | $14.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.67B | $5.01B | $202M | $817M | $100M |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | 24.5% | 21.8% | 16.5% | 59.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 9.2% | 3.0% | 3.4% | 2.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 13.6x | 76.1x | 15.6x | 46.6x |
| Total Debt | $31.04B | $21.08B | $35.97B | $5.98B | $6.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.94B | $4.31B | $1.69B | $3.23B | $627M |
UAL vs DAL vs AAL vs LUV vs ALK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Airlines Hol… (UAL) | 100 | 356.8 | +256.8% |
| Delta Air Lines, In… (DAL) | 100 | 290.8 | +190.8% |
| American Airlines G… (AAL) | 100 | 123.2 | +23.2% |
| Southwest Airlines … (LUV) | 100 | 129.3 | +29.3% |
| Alaska Air Group, I… (ALK) | 100 | 118.5 | +18.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UAL vs DAL vs AAL vs LUV vs ALK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UAL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 118.9% 10Y total return vs DAL's 89.5%
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 46.6x)
DAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 7.9% margin vs AAL's 0.4%
- +65.2% vs ALK's -18.9%
- 6.2% ROA vs AAL's 0.3%, ROIC 12.0% vs 3.5%
Among these 5 stocks, AAL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LUV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 74.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- Beta 1.45, yield 1.7%, current ratio 0.52x
- Beta 1.45 vs UAL's 2.25, lower leverage
ALK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.3%, EPS growth -71.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.9%
- 21.3% revenue growth vs AAL's 0.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.3% revenue growth vs AAL's 0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 46.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.9% margin vs AAL's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.45 vs UAL's 2.25, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs DAL's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.2% vs ALK's -18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs AAL's 0.3%, ROIC 12.0% vs 3.5% |
UAL vs DAL vs AAL vs LUV vs ALK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UAL vs DAL vs AAL vs LUV vs ALK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAL leads in 2 of 6 categories
UAL leads 0 • AAL leads 0 • LUV leads 0 • ALK leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.4B annually — 4.5x ALK's $14.2B. DAL is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AAL's 0.4%. On growth, LUV holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $60.5B | $63.4B | $56.0B | $28.9B | $14.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.1B | $8.9B | $3.7B | $2.5B | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.7B | $5.0B | $202M | $817M | $100M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.2B | $3.8B | $1.9B | -$401M | -$339M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +24.5% | +21.8% | +16.5% | +59.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +9.2% | +3.0% | +3.4% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +7.9% | +0.4% | +2.8% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +6.1% | +3.4% | -1.4% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | +2.9% | +10.8% | +12.8% | +2.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.5% | +44.2% | +19.4% | +2.7% | -67.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UAL and DAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, DAL trades at a 87% valuation discount to AAL's 76.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UAL's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAL's 12.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32.5B | $47.9B | $8.5B | $20.4B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $57.6B | $64.7B | $42.8B | $23.1B | $10.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.79x | 9.57x | 76.12x | 52.53x | 46.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.69x | 13.62x | — | 15.58x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.52x | 7.82x | 12.44x | 11.63x | 9.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 0.76x | 0.16x | 0.73x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.14x | 2.31x | — | 2.90x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.70x | 12.47x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DAL and LUV each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UAL delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $2 for ALK. LUV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.75x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UAL's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UAL scores 8/9 vs ALK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.9% | +24.1% | — | +10.7% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +6.2% | +0.3% | +2.8% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +12.0% | +3.5% | +3.0% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +11.4% | +3.9% | +2.2% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.03x | 1.02x | — | 0.75x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $25.1B | $16.8B | $34.3B | $2.8B | $6.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.9B | $4.3B | $1.7B | $3.2B | $627M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $31.0B | $21.1B | $36.0B | $6.0B | $6.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.61x | 9.69x | 2.45x | 9.62x | 2.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UAL five years ago would be worth $18,856 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,021 for AAL. Over the past 12 months, DAL leads with a +65.2% total return vs ALK's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAL at 29.9% vs AAL's -3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.5% | +6.4% | -16.4% | +0.9% | -21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.1% | +65.2% | +24.1% | +41.5% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +118.1% | +119.0% | -9.9% | +47.5% | -6.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.6% | +66.7% | -39.8% | -27.5% | -39.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +118.9% | +89.5% | -56.3% | +10.9% | -33.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.7% | +29.9% | -3.4% | +13.8% | -2.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DAL and LUV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LUV is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAL's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAL currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs ALK's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.25x | 1.93x | 1.96x | 1.45x | 2.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $119.21 | $76.39 | $16.50 | $54.89 | $65.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $71.55 | $44.10 | $10.09 | $28.98 | $33.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.9% | +96.0% | +78.4% | +75.6% | +61.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 58.6 | 58.5 | 50.2 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.2M | 12.2M | 67.6M | 8.2M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DAL and LUV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UAL as "Buy", DAL as "Buy", AAL as "Buy", LUV as "Hold", ALK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 65.4% upside for ALK (target: $67) vs 12.5% for DAL (target: $82). For income investors, LUV offers the higher dividend yield at 1.72% vs DAL's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $136.10 | $82.45 | $15.90 | $49.89 | $67.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 47 | 44 | 37 | 45 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | — | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.67 | — | $0.72 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +12.5% | 0.0% |
DAL leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
UAL vs DAL vs AAL vs LUV vs ALK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UAL or DAL or AAL or LUV or ALK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alaska Air Group, Inc.
(ALK) is the stronger pick with 21. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL). Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (13. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Airlines Holdings, Inc. (UAL) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UAL or DAL or AAL or LUV or ALK?
On trailing P/E, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) is the cheapest at 9. 6x versus American Airlines Group Inc. at 76. 1x. On forward P/E, United Airlines Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UAL or DAL or AAL or LUV or ALK?
Over the past 5 years, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) delivered a total return of +88. 6%, compared to -39. 8% for American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UAL returned +118. 9% versus AAL's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UAL or DAL or AAL or LUV or ALK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southwest Airlines Co.
(LUV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 45β versus United Airlines Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning UAL is approximately 55% more volatile than LUV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 75% versus 2% for United Airlines Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UAL or DAL or AAL or LUV or ALK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alaska Air Group, Inc.
(ALK) is pulling ahead at 21. 3% versus 0. 8% for American Airlines Group Inc. (AAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delta Air Lines, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to -86. 3% for American Airlines Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALK leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UAL or DAL or AAL or LUV or ALK?
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 9% net margin versus 0. 2% for American Airlines Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DAL leads at 9. 2% versus 1. 5% for LUV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UAL leads at 64. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UAL or DAL or AAL or LUV or ALK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 6x for Southwest Airlines Co. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALK: 65. 4% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UAL or DAL or AAL or LUV or ALK?
In this comparison, LUV (1.
7% yield), DAL (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. UAL, AAL, ALK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UAL or DAL or AAL or LUV or ALK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southwest Airlines Co.
(LUV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 7% yield). Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK) carries a higher beta of 2. 16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LUV: +10. 9%, ALK: -33. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UAL and DAL and AAL and LUV and ALK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AAL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LUV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ALK is a small-cap high-growth stock. DAL, LUV pay a dividend while UAL, AAL, ALK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.