Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UCL vs NFLX vs DIS vs GSAT vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
Consumer Electronics
UCL vs NFLX vs DIS vs GSAT vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $43M | $374.00B | $192.60B | $10.33B | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $85M | $45.18B | $97.26B | $262M | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $-50M | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 57.2% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | 29.5% | 15.5% | 1.4% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | 105.5x | 24.5x | 16.0x | — | 33.7x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $14.46B | $44.88B | $542M | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $391M | $35.93B |
UCL vs NFLX vs DIS vs GSAT vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| uCloudlink Group In… (UCL) | 100 | 7.0 | -93.0% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 192.3 | +92.3% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 96.8 | -3.2% |
| Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) | 100 | 1675.3 | +1575.3% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 321.6 | +221.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UCL vs NFLX vs DIS vs GSAT vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UCL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 1.32x
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- PEG 0.74 vs UCL's 2.29
- 15.9% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4%
- Lower P/E (24.5x vs 33.7x), PEG 0.74 vs 1.89
DIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.90, yield 0.9%, current ratio 0.71x
- 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
GSAT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +305.2% vs NFLX's -23.6%
AAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 0.4%
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs GSAT's 201.8%
- 27.2% margin vs GSAT's -19.0%
- 34.0% ROA vs GSAT's -2.3%, ROIC 67.4% vs -0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs DIS's 3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.5x vs 33.7x), PEG 0.74 vs 1.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.2% margin vs GSAT's -19.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs GSAT's 2.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +305.2% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs GSAT's -2.3%, ROIC 67.4% vs -0.1% |
UCL vs NFLX vs DIS vs GSAT vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UCL vs NFLX vs DIS vs GSAT vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UCL leads in 1 of 6 categories
GSAT leads 1 • NFLX leads 0 • DIS leads 0 • AAPL leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GSAT and AAPL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 5296.2x UCL's $85M. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GSAT's -19.0%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $85M | $45.2B | $97.3B | $262M | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $236,000 | $30.1B | $20.5B | $93M | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $11.0B | $11.2B | -$50M | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $9.5B | $7.1B | $151M | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.8% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +57.2% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +29.5% | +15.5% | +1.4% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +24.3% | +11.5% | -19.0% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +57.6% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | +17.6% | +6.5% | +2.1% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | +31.1% | -29.8% | -121.9% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
UCL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.9x trailing earnings, UCL trades at a 98% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UCL offers better value at 0.02x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $374.0B | $192.6B | $10.3B | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $10.5B | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.95x | 34.89x | 15.87x | -138.10x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 105.50x | 24.52x | 15.97x | — | 33.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.02x | 1.06x | — | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.39x | 12.61x | 12.10x | 119.09x | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 41.28x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 14.32x | 1.72x | 28.58x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.27x | 39.53x | 19.11x | 57.85x | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — UCL and AAPL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-14 for GSAT. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs GSAT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.4% | +41.3% | +9.8% | -13.7% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | +19.8% | +5.6% | -2.3% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +29.8% | +6.9% | -0.1% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.8% | +30.5% | +8.5% | -0.1% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 1.51x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $5.4B | $39.2B | $151M | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $391M | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $14.5B | $44.9B | $542M | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.37x | 17.33x | 9.95x | -0.07x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GSAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GSAT five years ago would be worth $49,382 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,065 for UCL. Over the past 12 months, GSAT leads with a +305.2% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GSAT at 80.1% vs UCL's -35.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.3% | -3.0% | -2.8% | +27.3% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.6% | -23.6% | +7.7% | +305.2% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | +166.5% | +8.0% | +484.1% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | +75.2% | -39.8% | +393.8% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | +875.3% | +11.8% | +201.8% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.3% | +38.6% | +2.6% | +80.1% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GSAT's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs UCL's 27.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.35x | 0.91x | 2.04x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $82.85 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $17.24 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.2% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +98.3% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.1 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 66.4 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 1.5M | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DIS and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", GSAT as "Hold", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.0% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs -19.0% for GSAT (target: $66). For income investors, DIS offers the higher dividend yield at 0.92% vs GSAT's 0.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $115.59 | $138.44 | $66.00 | $319.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 | 63 | 5 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | +0.1% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 2 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | $0.08 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
UCL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). GSAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
UCL vs NFLX vs DIS vs GSAT vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UCL or NFLX or DIS or GSAT or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E (105. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UCL or NFLX or DIS or GSAT or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is the cheapest at 0. 9x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus uCloudlink Group Inc. 's 2. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UCL or NFLX or DIS or GSAT or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Globalstar, Inc.
(GSAT) delivered a total return of +393. 8%, compared to -89. 3% for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1199% versus UCL's -93. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UCL or NFLX or DIS or GSAT or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Globalstar, Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning GSAT is approximately 477% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UCL or NFLX or DIS or GSAT or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 3. 4% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: uCloudlink Group Inc. grew EPS 1479% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Globalstar, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GSAT leads at 26. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UCL or NFLX or DIS or GSAT or AAPL?
Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus -25. 2% for Globalstar, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32. 0% versus -0. 4% for GSAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GSAT leads at 66. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UCL or NFLX or DIS or GSAT or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus uCloudlink Group Inc. 's 2. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 105. 5x for uCloudlink Group Inc. — 89. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 0% to $115. 59.
08Which pays a better dividend — UCL or NFLX or DIS or GSAT or AAPL?
In this comparison, DIS (0.
9% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), GSAT (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. UCL, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UCL or NFLX or DIS or GSAT or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), +866. 6% 10Y return). Globalstar, Inc. (GSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +866. 6%, GSAT: +204. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UCL and NFLX and DIS and GSAT and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (UCL (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and GSAT (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UCL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GSAT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. DIS pays a dividend while UCL, NFLX, GSAT, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.