Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UHAL vs CUBE vs PSA vs EXR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
UHAL vs CUBE vs PSA vs EXR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $9.32B | $9.22B | $54.60B | $30.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.00B | $1.13B | $4.86B | $3.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $139M | $327M | $1.90B | $974M |
| Gross Margin | 49.5% | 5.8% | 60.6% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 29.5% | 50.8% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | 138.7x | 28.6x | 32.6x | 30.8x |
| Total Debt | $7.24B | $3.53B | $10.25B | $14.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $989M | $6M | $318M | $139M |
UHAL vs CUBE vs PSA vs EXR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U-Haul Holding Comp… (UHAL) | 100 | 163.8 | +63.8% |
| CubeSmart (CUBE) | 100 | 142.2 | +42.2% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
| Extra Space Storage… (EXR) | 100 | 148.1 | +48.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UHAL vs CUBE vs PSA vs EXR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UHAL plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CUBE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 5.1%
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- PEG 2.50 vs EXR's 7.09
- Beta 0.52, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.13x
PSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 39.2% margin vs UHAL's 2.3%
- +7.4% vs UHAL's -17.9%
- 9.4% ROA vs UHAL's 0.6%, ROIC 8.9% vs 4.2%
EXR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 104.4% 10Y total return vs PSA's 57.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, current ratio 1.28x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% FFO/revenue growth vs EXR's 1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.6x vs 30.8x), PEG 2.50 vs 7.09 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.2% margin vs UHAL's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs UHAL's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EXR's 4.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.4% vs UHAL's -17.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs UHAL's 0.6%, ROIC 8.9% vs 4.2% |
UHAL vs CUBE vs PSA vs EXR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UHAL vs CUBE vs PSA vs EXR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSA leads in 3 of 6 categories
CUBE leads 2 • UHAL leads 0 • EXR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UHAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 5.3x CUBE's $1.1B. PSA is the more profitable business, keeping 39.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UHAL's 2.3%. On growth, EXR holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.0B | $1.1B | $4.9B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $597M | $3.6B | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $139M | $327M | $1.9B | $974M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $611M | $3.1B | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.5% | +5.8% | +60.6% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +29.5% | +50.8% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +28.9% | +39.2% | +28.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +54.0% | +63.1% | +54.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +3.3% | +2.9% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -160.5% | -7.7% | +33.1% | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CUBE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.7x trailing earnings, CUBE trades at a 20% valuation discount to PSA's 34.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CUBE offers better value at 2.43x vs EXR's 7.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.3B | $9.2B | $54.6B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.6B | $12.8B | $64.5B | $45.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.25x | 27.71x | 34.52x | 31.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 138.67x | 28.56x | 32.57x | 30.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.43x | 4.63x | 7.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.17x | 18.03x | 18.95x | 20.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.60x | 8.21x | 11.32x | 8.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 3.33x | 5.86x | 2.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.27x | 18.85x | 16.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSA delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $2 for UHAL. UHAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CUBE's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSA scores 5/9 vs CUBE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | +11.7% | +20.3% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +4.9% | +9.4% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +5.5% | +8.9% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +7.3% | +11.6% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 1.27x | 1.10x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.3B | $3.5B | $9.9B | $14.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $989M | $6M | $318M | $139M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.2B | $3.5B | $10.3B | $15.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.91x | 3.90x | 6.88x | 2.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSA five years ago would be worth $13,609 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,392 for UHAL. Over the past 12 months, PSA leads with a +7.4% total return vs UHAL's -17.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSA at 5.3% vs UHAL's -5.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.5% | +17.3% | +21.5% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.9% | +0.2% | +7.4% | +1.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.1% | +0.5% | +16.7% | +3.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.1% | +17.2% | +36.1% | +17.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.4% | +74.9% | +57.4% | +104.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.3% | +0.2% | +5.3% | +1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CUBE and PSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CUBE is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UHAL's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSA currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs UHAL's 78.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.52x | 0.55x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.64 | $44.13 | $313.51 | $155.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.95 | $35.09 | $256.54 | $125.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.1% | +91.7% | +99.2% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 58.0 | 59.4 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 224K | 2.2M | 1.1M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
CUBE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UHAL as "Buy", CUBE as "Hold", PSA as "Hold", EXR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 51.5% upside for UHAL (target: $80) vs -2.0% for PSA (target: $305). For income investors, CUBE offers the higher dividend yield at 5.14% vs UHAL's 0.34%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.00 | $39.67 | $304.91 | $149.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 29 | 36 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +5.1% | +4.2% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | $2.08 | $13.09 | $6.49 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
PSA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CUBE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
UHAL vs CUBE vs PSA vs EXR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UHAL or CUBE or PSA or EXR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the stronger pick with 5.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). CubeSmart (CUBE) offers the better valuation at 27. 7x trailing P/E (28. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UHAL or CUBE or PSA or EXR?
On trailing P/E, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the cheapest at 27.
7x versus Public Storage at 34. 5x. On forward P/E, CubeSmart is actually cheaper at 28. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CubeSmart wins at 2. 50x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. 's 7. 09x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UHAL or CUBE or PSA or EXR?
Over the past 5 years, Public Storage (PSA) delivered a total return of +36.
1%, compared to -16. 1% for U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXR returned +104. 4% versus UHAL's +49. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UHAL or CUBE or PSA or EXR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CubeSmart (CUBE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
52β versus U-Haul Holding Company's 1. 01β — meaning UHAL is approximately 92% more volatile than CUBE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 127% for CubeSmart — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UHAL or CUBE or PSA or EXR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CubeSmart (CUBE) is pulling ahead at 5.
3% versus 1. 2% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Extra Space Storage Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -44. 5% for U-Haul Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXR leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UHAL or CUBE or PSA or EXR?
Public Storage (PSA) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
0% net margin versus 5. 7% for U-Haul Holding Company — meaning it keeps 37. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSA leads at 46. 7% versus 12. 3% for UHAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UHAL leads at 85. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UHAL or CUBE or PSA or EXR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 50x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. 's 7. 09x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, CubeSmart (CUBE) trades at 28. 6x forward P/E versus 138. 7x for U-Haul Holding Company — 110. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UHAL: 51. 5% to $80. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UHAL or CUBE or PSA or EXR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CubeSmart (CUBE) offers the highest yield at 5. 1%, versus 0. 3% for U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL).
09Is UHAL or CUBE or PSA or EXR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Extra Space Storage Inc.
(EXR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 4. 5% yield, +104. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXR: +104. 4%, UHAL: +49. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UHAL and CUBE and PSA and EXR?
These companies operate in different sectors (UHAL (Industrials) and CUBE (Real Estate) and PSA (Real Estate) and EXR (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UHAL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CUBE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PSA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EXR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. CUBE, PSA, EXR pay a dividend while UHAL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.