Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
VABK logo
VABK
NTRS logo
NTRS
STT logo
STT
NBTB logo
NBTB
ICE logo
ICE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VABK
Virginia National Bankshares Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$244M
5Y Perf.+78.2%
NTRS
Northern Trust Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$32.31B
5Y Perf.+119.7%
STT
State Street Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$48.45B
5Y Perf.+163.8%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.60B
5Y Perf.+53.4%

VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VABK logoVABK
NTRS logoNTRS
STT logoSTT
NBTB logoNBTB
ICE logoICE
IndustryBanks - RegionalAsset ManagementAsset ManagementBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$244M$32.31B$48.45B$2.52B$79.60B
Revenue (TTM)$83M$14.30B$22.63B$902M$12.64B
Net Income (TTM)$19M$1.74B$2.94B$169M$3.30B
Gross Margin69.0%56.5%61.4%73.6%61.9%
Operating Margin28.9%16.3%16.5%24.3%38.7%
Forward P/E12.7x16.1x13.5x11.5x17.3x
Total Debt$30M$16.43B$29.80B$327M$20.28B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$61.13B$131.36B$185M$837M

VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VABK
NTRS
STT
NBTB
ICE
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Virginia National B… (VABK)100178.2+78.2%
Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS)100219.7+119.7%
State Street Corpor… (STT)100263.8+163.8%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100153.4+53.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ICE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Virginia National Bankshares Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. NTRS, STT, and NBTB also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇ICE emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
VABK
Virginia National Bankshares Corporation
The Banking Pick

VABK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 3.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 3.53x
  • Beta 0.48, yield 3.1%, current ratio 3.53x
  • 3.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STT's 1.8%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NTRS
Northern Trust Corporation
The Banking Pick

NTRS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 1.63 vs VABK's 3.36
  • Lower P/E (16.1x vs 17.3x), PEG 1.63 vs 1.95
Best for: valuation efficiency
STT
State Street Corporation
The Banking Pick

STT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 222.0% 10Y total return vs NTRS's 183.6%
  • +75.1% vs ICE's -20.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.1% vs STT's 0.8%
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
Best for: bank quality
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • Beta 0.35 vs STT's 1.20, lower leverage
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
ValueNTRS logoNTRSLower P/E (16.1x vs 17.3x), PEG 1.63 vs 1.95
Quality / MarginsICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.35 vs STT's 1.20, lower leverage
DividendsVABK logoVABK3.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STT's 1.8%
Momentum (1Y)STT logoSTT+75.1% vs ICE's -20.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5%

VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
VABKVirginia National Bankshares Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

NTRSNorthern Trust Corporation
FY 2025
Corporate and Institutional Service
58.5%$4.8B
Wealth Management
41.5%$3.4B
STTState Street Corporation
FY 2025
Investment Servicing
80.9%$11.3B
Investment Management
18.8%$2.6B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Excluding Corporate Nonsegment
0.3%$42M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M

VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLICELAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

STT is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.6B annually — 271.5x VABK's $83M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRS's 12.1%.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$83M$14.3B$22.6B$902M$12.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$26M$3.2B$4.3B$241M$6.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$19M$1.7B$2.9B$169M$3.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$21M$4.7B$2.7B$225M$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.0%+56.5%+61.4%+73.6%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+28.9%+16.3%+16.5%+24.3%+38.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+23.1%+12.1%+13.0%+18.8%+26.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.9%+33.1%+12.1%+24.9%+33.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+31.0%+7.1%+23.0%+39.5%+23.1%
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NTRS and STT and NBTB each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.7x trailing earnings, VABK trades at a 48% valuation discount to ICE's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTRS offers better value at 2.02x vs VABK's 3.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Market CapShares × price$244M$32.3B$48.4B$2.5B$79.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$268M-$12.4B-$53.1B$2.7B$99.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.68x19.95x17.83x14.47x24.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.08x13.49x11.54x17.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.36x2.02x2.16x2.06x2.74x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.13x-3.85x-12.39x11.03x15.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.93x2.26x2.14x2.90x6.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.32x2.54x1.74x1.29x2.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.76x5.92x11.29x11.49x18.56x
Evenly matched — NTRS and STT and NBTB each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

NTRS delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. VABK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTRS's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs NTRS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.0%+13.4%+10.8%+9.5%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.2%+1.0%+0.8%+1.1%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.0%+6.0%+4.7%+7.9%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.6%+9.0%+4.5%+2.4%+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966779
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x1.27x1.07x0.17x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$24M-$44.7B-$101.6B$142M$19.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$61.1B$131.4B$185M$837M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$30M$16.4B$29.8B$327M$20.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.94x0.38x0.43x1.05x6.53x
ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

STT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in STT five years ago would be worth $21,379 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,085 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, STT leads with a +75.1% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRS at 35.6% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.2%+26.3%+31.2%+17.6%-11.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+24.1%+62.8%+75.1%+18.3%-20.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.9%+149.4%+141.7%+48.5%+34.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.9%+62.6%+113.8%+44.4%+30.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+146.5%+183.6%+222.0%+108.5%+195.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.4%+35.6%+34.2%+14.1%+10.4%
STT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STT's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.48x1.07x1.20x0.76x0.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$48.58$175.11$168.28$48.27$189.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$36.48$107.08$95.67$39.20$136.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.6%+99.6%+99.6%+99.8%+74.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.057.668.363.131.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6K1.0M1.8M266K3.2M
Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — VABK and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NTRS as "Hold", STT as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -11.8% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, VABK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.12% vs ICE's 1.38%.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…NTRS logoNTRSNorthern Trust Co…STT logoSTTState Street Corp…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$153.75$161.50$46.00$194.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts35371036
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%+1.8%+1.8%+3.0%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11151313
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.40$3.14$3.09$1.43$1.93
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.9%+2.7%+0.4%+1.7%
Evenly matched — VABK and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallIntercontinental Exchange, … (ICE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate State Street Corporation (STT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?

On trailing P/E, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) is the cheapest at 12.

7x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northern Trust Corporation wins at 1. 63x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 95x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?

Over the past 5 years, State Street Corporation (STT) delivered a total return of +113.

8%, compared to +30. 9% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STT returned +222. 0% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus State Street Corporation's 1. 20β — meaning STT is approximately 241% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 127% for Northern Trust Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 12. 1% for Northern Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 3% for NTRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 63x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 95x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

09

Is VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 1. 4% yield, +195. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +195. 3%, STT: +222. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VABK and NTRS and STT and NBTB and ICE?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: VABK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.