Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Banks - Regional
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Asset Management | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $244M | $32.31B | $48.45B | $2.52B | $79.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $83M | $14.30B | $22.63B | $902M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $1.74B | $2.94B | $169M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 69.0% | 56.5% | 61.4% | 73.6% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 28.9% | 16.3% | 16.5% | 24.3% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 16.1x | 13.5x | 11.5x | 17.3x |
| Total Debt | $30M | $16.43B | $29.80B | $327M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $61.13B | $131.36B | $185M | $837M |
VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virginia National B… (VABK) | 100 | 178.2 | +78.2% |
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 219.7 | +119.7% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 263.8 | +163.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VABK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 3.53x
- Beta 0.48, yield 3.1%, current ratio 3.53x
- 3.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STT's 1.8%
NTRS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.63 vs VABK's 3.36
- Lower P/E (16.1x vs 17.3x), PEG 1.63 vs 1.95
STT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 222.0% 10Y total return vs NTRS's 183.6%
- +75.1% vs ICE's -20.4%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.1% vs STT's 0.8%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.35 vs STT's 1.20, lower leverage
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.1x vs 17.3x), PEG 1.63 vs 1.95 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs STT's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs STT's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.1% vs ICE's -20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories
STT leads 1 • VABK leads 0 • NTRS leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STT is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.6B annually — 271.5x VABK's $83M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTRS's 12.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $83M | $14.3B | $22.6B | $902M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $3.2B | $4.3B | $241M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $1.7B | $2.9B | $169M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | $4.7B | $2.7B | $225M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.0% | +56.5% | +61.4% | +73.6% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.9% | +16.3% | +16.5% | +24.3% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +12.1% | +13.0% | +18.8% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +33.1% | +12.1% | +24.9% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31.0% | +7.1% | +23.0% | +39.5% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NTRS and STT and NBTB each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.7x trailing earnings, VABK trades at a 48% valuation discount to ICE's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTRS offers better value at 2.02x vs VABK's 3.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $244M | $32.3B | $48.4B | $2.5B | $79.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $268M | -$12.4B | -$53.1B | $2.7B | $99.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.68x | 19.95x | 17.83x | 14.47x | 24.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 16.08x | 13.49x | 11.54x | 17.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.36x | 2.02x | 2.16x | 2.06x | 2.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.13x | -3.85x | -12.39x | 11.03x | 15.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.93x | 2.26x | 2.14x | 2.90x | 6.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 2.54x | 1.74x | 1.29x | 2.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.76x | 5.92x | 11.29x | 11.49x | 18.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. VABK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTRS's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs NTRS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +13.4% | +10.8% | +9.5% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +6.0% | +4.7% | +7.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +9.0% | +4.5% | +2.4% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 1.27x | 1.07x | 0.17x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | -$44.7B | -$101.6B | $142M | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $61.1B | $131.4B | $185M | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $16.4B | $29.8B | $327M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | 0.38x | 0.43x | 1.05x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STT five years ago would be worth $21,379 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,085 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, STT leads with a +75.1% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRS at 35.6% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.2% | +26.3% | +31.2% | +17.6% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | +62.8% | +75.1% | +18.3% | -20.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.9% | +149.4% | +141.7% | +48.5% | +34.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.9% | +62.6% | +113.8% | +44.4% | +30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.5% | +183.6% | +222.0% | +108.5% | +195.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.4% | +35.6% | +34.2% | +14.1% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STT's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 1.07x | 1.20x | 0.76x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.58 | $175.11 | $168.28 | $48.27 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.48 | $107.08 | $95.67 | $39.20 | $136.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +99.6% | +99.6% | +99.8% | +74.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 57.6 | 68.3 | 63.1 | 31.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 1.0M | 1.8M | 266K | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — VABK and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTRS as "Hold", STT as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -11.8% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, VABK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.12% vs ICE's 1.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $153.75 | $161.50 | $46.00 | $194.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 | 37 | 10 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +1.8% | +1.8% | +3.0% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 15 | 13 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $3.14 | $3.09 | $1.43 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.9% | +2.7% | +0.4% | +1.7% |
ICE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
VABK vs NTRS vs STT vs NBTB vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) offers the better valuation at 12. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate State Street Corporation (STT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?
On trailing P/E, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) is the cheapest at 12.
7x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northern Trust Corporation wins at 1. 63x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 95x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, State Street Corporation (STT) delivered a total return of +113.
8%, compared to +30. 9% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STT returned +222. 0% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus State Street Corporation's 1. 20β — meaning STT is approximately 241% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 127% for Northern Trust Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 12. 1% for Northern Trust Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 3% for NTRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 63x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 95x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is VABK or NTRS or STT or NBTB or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 1. 4% yield, +195. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +195. 3%, STT: +222. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VABK and NTRS and STT and NBTB and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VABK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.