Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VEEE vs MCFT vs BC vs MBUU vs HZO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VEEE
Twin Vee Powercats Co.

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$342K
5Y Perf.-96.5%
MCFT
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$417M
5Y Perf.-3.8%
BC
Brunswick Corporation

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.26B
5Y Perf.-22.7%
MBUU
Malibu Boats, Inc.

Auto - Recreational Vehicles

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$473M
5Y Perf.-69.6%
HZO
MarineMax, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$724M
5Y Perf.-38.9%

VEEE vs MCFT vs BC vs MBUU vs HZO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VEEE logoVEEE
MCFT logoMCFT
BC logoBC
MBUU logoMBUU
HZO logoHZO
IndustryAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Recreational VehiclesAuto - Recreational VehiclesSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$342K$417M$5.26B$473M$724M
Revenue (TTM)$15M$298M$5.52B$826M$2.24B
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$11M$-137M$-5M$-64M
Gross Margin3.1%23.1%18.0%15.4%32.7%
Operating Margin-60.5%3.7%5.2%0.1%-0.6%
Forward P/E17.0x19.0x20.9x45.0x
Total Debt$542K$0.00$2.43B$25M$1.25B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$29M$275M$37M$170M

VEEE vs MCFT vs BC vs MBUU vs HZOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VEEE
MCFT
BC
MBUU
HZO
StockJul 21May 26Return
Twin Vee Powercats … (VEEE)1003.5-96.5%
MasterCraft Boat Ho… (MCFT)10096.2-3.8%
Brunswick Corporati… (BC)10077.3-22.7%
Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU)10030.4-69.6%
MarineMax, Inc. (HZO)10061.1-38.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VEEE vs MCFT vs BC vs MBUU vs HZO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MCFT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Twin Vee Powercats Co. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. BC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
VEEE
Twin Vee Powercats Co.
The Growth Play

VEEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 60.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -22.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 2.18x
  • Beta 0.41, current ratio 2.18x
  • 3.0% revenue growth vs MCFT's -22.5%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
MCFT
MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MCFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 121.5% 10Y total return vs BC's 96.4%
  • Lower P/E (17.0x vs 45.0x)
  • 3.7% margin vs VEEE's -59.9%
  • 4.2% ROA vs VEEE's -45.1%, ROIC 4.4% vs -44.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
BC
Brunswick Corporation
The Income Pick

BC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 2.1%
  • 2.1% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +79.7% vs VEEE's -93.2%
Best for: income & stability
MBUU
Malibu Boats, Inc.
The Quality Angle

MBUU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
HZO
MarineMax, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, HZO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVEEE logoVEEE3.0% revenue growth vs MCFT's -22.5%
ValueMCFT logoMCFTLower P/E (17.0x vs 45.0x)
Quality / MarginsMCFT logoMCFT3.7% margin vs VEEE's -59.9%
Stability / SafetyVEEE logoVEEEBeta 0.41 vs HZO's 2.09, lower leverage
DividendsBC logoBC2.1% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BC logoBC+79.7% vs VEEE's -93.2%
Efficiency (ROA)MCFT logoMCFT4.2% ROA vs VEEE's -45.1%, ROIC 4.4% vs -44.0%

VEEE vs MCFT vs BC vs MBUU vs HZO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

VEEETwin Vee Powercats Co.

Segment breakdown not available.

MCFTMasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Parts
78.0%$13M
Other Product
22.0%$4M
BCBrunswick Corporation
FY 2025
Propulsion
35.6%$1.9B
Boat
28.4%$1.5B
Parts and Accessories
22.6%$1.2B
Navico Group
13.4%$721M
MBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.
FY 2025
Malibu
38.7%$313M
Pursuit Boats
34.6%$280M
Cobalt
26.7%$215M
HZOMarineMax, Inc.
FY 2025
Retail Operations
94.3%$2.3B
Product Manufacturing
5.7%$139M

VEEE vs MCFT vs BC vs MBUU vs HZO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBCLAGGINGMBUU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 363.8x VEEE's $15M. MCFT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VEEE's -59.9%. On growth, BC holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVEEE logoVEEETwin Vee Powercat…MCFT logoMCFTMasterCraft Boat …BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15M$298M$5.5B$826M$2.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M$14M$511M$11M$11M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M$11M-$137M-$5M-$64M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M$25M$341M$40M$169M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+3.1%+23.1%+18.0%+15.4%+32.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-60.5%+3.7%+5.2%+0.1%-0.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-59.9%+3.7%-2.5%-0.6%-2.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-11.7%+8.5%+6.2%+4.8%+7.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.8%+3.0%+12.8%+3.1%-16.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-24.8%-2.6%+6.7%-118.2%-185.7%
BC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — VEEE and BC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 33.4x trailing earnings, MBUU trades at a 44% valuation discount to MCFT's 59.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MBUU's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BC's 29.3x.

MetricVEEE logoVEEETwin Vee Powercat…MCFT logoMCFTMasterCraft Boat …BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$342,018$417M$5.3B$473M$724M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$548,017$388M$7.4B$461M$1.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.04x59.63x-38.82x33.42x-22.98x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.98x18.98x20.89x44.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.67x29.31x7.64x11.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.02x1.47x0.98x0.59x0.31x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.03x2.31x3.26x0.96x0.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.81x13.27x16.53x60.62x
Evenly matched — VEEE and BC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MCFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MCFT delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-56 for VEEE. VEEE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BC's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MBUU scores 7/9 vs BC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVEEE logoVEEETwin Vee Powercat…MCFT logoMCFTMasterCraft Boat …BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-55.7%+5.9%-5.1%-1.0%-6.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-45.1%+4.2%-2.5%-0.7%-2.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-44.0%+4.4%-0.8%+3.2%+3.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-45.2%+5.2%-1.0%+3.6%+6.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946475
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x1.49x0.05x1.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$890,035-$29M$2.2B-$12M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$29M$275M$37M$170M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$541,543$0$2.4B$25M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-203.95x100.99x4.34x1.84x0.71x
MCFT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HZO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MCFT five years ago would be worth $8,619 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $232 for VEEE. Over the past 12 months, BC leads with a +79.7% total return vs VEEE's -93.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HZO at 4.6% vs VEEE's -50.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVEEE logoVEEETwin Vee Powercat…MCFT logoMCFTMasterCraft Boat …BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-90.2%+35.7%+7.0%-11.2%+36.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-93.2%+45.4%+79.7%-14.7%+56.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.9%-11.7%+3.8%-56.4%+14.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.7%-13.8%-23.5%-70.0%-49.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.7%+121.5%+96.4%+76.9%+78.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-50.5%-4.1%+1.2%-24.2%+4.6%
HZO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — VEEE and HZO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

VEEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HZO's 2.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HZO currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs VEEE's 1.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVEEE logoVEEETwin Vee Powercat…MCFT logoMCFTMasterCraft Boat …BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.41x1.25x1.69x1.71x2.09x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$344.10$26.49$90.23$39.65$33.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.48$16.46$45.52$23.84$20.52
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.9%+96.8%+89.5%+64.1%+99.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.562.757.650.061.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded331K146K886K336K344K
Evenly matched — VEEE and HZO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MCFT as "Buy", BC as "Buy", MBUU as "Buy", HZO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.9% upside for MBUU (target: $33) vs -3.8% for MCFT (target: $25). BC is the only dividend payer here at 2.12% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricVEEE logoVEEETwin Vee Powercat…MCFT logoMCFTMasterCraft Boat …BC logoBCBrunswick Corpora…MBUU logoMBUUMalibu Boats, Inc.HZO logoHZOMarineMax, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.67$88.78$32.75$32.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts10311617
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises21311
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.3%+1.5%+7.6%+3.8%
BC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). MCFT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallBrunswick Corporation (BC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VEEE vs MCFT vs BC vs MBUU vs HZO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VEEE or MCFT or BC or MBUU or HZO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Twin Vee Powercats Co.

(VEEE) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 5% for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT). Malibu Boats, Inc. (MBUU) offers the better valuation at 33. 4x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VEEE or MCFT or BC or MBUU or HZO?

On trailing P/E, Malibu Boats, Inc.

(MBUU) is the cheapest at 33. 4x versus MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. at 59. 6x. On forward P/E, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VEEE or MCFT or BC or MBUU or HZO?

Over the past 5 years, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.

(MCFT) delivered a total return of -13. 8%, compared to -97. 7% for Twin Vee Powercats Co. (VEEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCFT returned +121. 5% versus VEEE's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VEEE or MCFT or BC or MBUU or HZO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Twin Vee Powercats Co.

(VEEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus MarineMax, Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning HZO is approximately 416% more volatile than VEEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twin Vee Powercats Co. (VEEE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 149% for Brunswick Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VEEE or MCFT or BC or MBUU or HZO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twin Vee Powercats Co.

(VEEE) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus -22. 5% for MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc. (MCFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Malibu Boats, Inc. grew EPS 127. 7% year-over-year, compared to -207. 8% for Brunswick Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, HZO leads at 0. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VEEE or MCFT or BC or MBUU or HZO?

MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.

(MCFT) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 5% net margin versus -58. 1% for Twin Vee Powercats Co. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HZO leads at 4. 5% versus -55. 1% for VEEE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HZO leads at 32. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VEEE or MCFT or BC or MBUU or HZO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MasterCraft Boat Holdings, Inc.

(MCFT) trades at 17. 0x forward P/E versus 45. 0x for MarineMax, Inc. — 28. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBUU: 28. 9% to $32. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VEEE or MCFT or BC or MBUU or HZO?

In this comparison, BC (2.

1% yield) pays a dividend. VEEE, MCFT, MBUU, HZO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is VEEE or MCFT or BC or MBUU or HZO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Twin Vee Powercats Co.

(VEEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41)). MarineMax, Inc. (HZO) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VEEE: -97. 7%, HZO: +78. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VEEE and MCFT and BC and MBUU and HZO?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

BC pays a dividend while VEEE, MCFT, MBUU, HZO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

VEEE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCFT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MBUU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HZO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform VEEE and MCFT and BC and MBUU and HZO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(VEEE: 9.8% · MCFT: 3.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.