Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VHC vs IDCC vs QCOM vs ACTG vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Semiconductors
Specialty Business Services
Consumer Electronics
VHC vs IDCC vs QCOM vs ACTG vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Specialty Business Services | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $54M | $7.18B | $213.51B | $454M | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $144K | $829M | $44.49B | $215M | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $366M | $9.92B | $-18M | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 80.2% | 83.4% | 54.8% | 104.9% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | -177.4% | 49.6% | 25.5% | -18.7% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 38.8x | 18.8x | 21.4x | 33.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $506M | $16.37B | $100M | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $739M | $7.84B | $307M | $35.93B |
VHC vs IDCC vs QCOM vs ACTG vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| VirnetX Holding Corp (VHC) | 100 | 30.5 | -69.5% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 508.7 | +408.7% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 270.9 | +170.9% |
| Acacia Research Cor… (ACTG) | 100 | 179.9 | +79.9% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 368.9 | +268.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VHC vs IDCC vs QCOM vs ACTG vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VHC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 31.4% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
IDCC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.74 vs QCOM's 9.06
- PEG 0.74 vs 1.89
- 44.2% margin vs VHC's -168.5%
QCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.82x
- 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs IDCC's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ACTG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 133.2%, EPS growth 161.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 68.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.2%, current ratio 9.18x
- Beta 0.76 vs VHC's 2.03
- +53.3% vs IDCC's +32.4%
AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs IDCC's 436.7%
- 34.0% ROA vs VHC's -40.9%, ROIC 67.4% vs -89.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.4% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0% | |
| Value | PEG 0.74 vs 1.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.2% margin vs VHC's -168.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs VHC's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs IDCC's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.3% vs IDCC's +32.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs VHC's -40.9%, ROIC 67.4% vs -89.4% |
VHC vs IDCC vs QCOM vs ACTG vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VHC vs IDCC vs QCOM vs ACTG vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDCC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACTG leads 1 • AAPL leads 1 • QCOM leads 1 • VHC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 3135013.9x VHC's $144,000. IDCC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VHC's -168.5%. On growth, VHC holds the edge at +28.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $144,000 | $829M | $44.5B | $215M | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $489M | $12.8B | -$8M | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $366M | $9.9B | -$18M | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $580M | $12.5B | $52M | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.2% | +83.4% | +54.8% | +104.9% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -177.4% | +49.6% | +25.5% | -18.7% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -168.5% | +44.2% | +22.3% | -8.5% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -145.0% | +70.0% | +28.1% | +24.4% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.0% | -2.4% | -3.5% | -56.4% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | -38.0% | +173.0% | -164.0% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACTG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.4x trailing earnings, ACTG trades at a 47% valuation discount to QCOM's 40.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IDCC offers better value at 0.45x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $7.2B | $213.5B | $454M | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38M | $6.9B | $222.0B | $248M | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.53x | 23.62x | 40.43x | 21.39x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 38.80x | 18.84x | — | 33.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 19.44x | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.91x | 15.91x | 4.98x | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 333.23x | 8.61x | 4.82x | 1.59x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.05x | 8.73x | 10.56x | 0.78x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.58x | 16.65x | 7.75x | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-52 for VHC. ACTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACTG scores 9/9 vs VHC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -51.6% | +33.4% | +40.2% | -3.2% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.9% | +17.7% | +18.4% | -2.4% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -89.4% | +40.9% | +29.1% | +1.2% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -54.4% | +38.1% | +28.9% | +0.9% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.46x | 0.77x | 0.17x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | -$233M | $8.5B | -$206M | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $739M | $7.8B | $307M | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $506M | $16.4B | $100M | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.48x | 17.60x | -5.51x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $40,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,908 for ACTG. Over the past 12 months, ACTG leads with a +53.3% total return vs IDCC's +32.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDCC at 52.1% vs ACTG's 6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.6% | -14.1% | +17.6% | +25.8% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.2% | +32.4% | +42.9% | +53.3% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.6% | +251.7% | +96.4% | +19.7% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | +303.1% | +58.5% | -20.9% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.5% | +436.7% | +350.2% | +2.5% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.8% | +52.1% | +25.2% | +6.2% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACTG and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACTG is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VHC's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs VHC's 43.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.15x | 1.11x | 1.64x | 0.69x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.00 | $412.60 | $223.66 | $5.27 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.60 | $205.78 | $121.99 | $3.03 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.6% | +67.6% | +90.6% | +89.3% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 30.8 | 80.1 | 57.4 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 393K | 15.1M | 343K | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IDCC as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", ACTG as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.5% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs -13.6% for QCOM (target: $175). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs AAPL's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $425.00 | $175.00 | — | $319.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 69 | 7 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% | +1.7% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 | 23 | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.76 | $3.44 | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | +4.1% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
IDCC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ACTG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
VHC vs IDCC vs QCOM vs ACTG vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VHC or IDCC or QCOM or ACTG or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, VirnetX Holding Corp (VHC) is the stronger pick with 31.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) offers the better valuation at 21. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VHC or IDCC or QCOM or ACTG or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) is the cheapest at 21.
4x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 40. 4x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: InterDigital, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VHC or IDCC or QCOM or ACTG or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) delivered a total return of +303. 1%, compared to -20. 9% for Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1199% versus ACTG's +1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VHC or IDCC or QCOM or ACTG or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
69β versus VirnetX Holding Corp's 2. 15β — meaning VHC is approximately 212% more volatile than ACTG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VHC or IDCC or QCOM or ACTG or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), VirnetX Holding Corp (VHC) is pulling ahead at 31.
4% versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Acacia Research Corporation grew EPS 161. 1% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACTG leads at 68. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VHC or IDCC or QCOM or ACTG or AAPL?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus -168. 5% for VirnetX Holding Corp — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus -120. 0% for VHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACTG leads at 82. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VHC or IDCC or QCOM or ACTG or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for InterDigital, Inc. — 20. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52. 5% to $425. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VHC or IDCC or QCOM or ACTG or AAPL?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield), IDCC (0. 6% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. VHC, ACTG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VHC or IDCC or QCOM or ACTG or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1199% 10Y return). VirnetX Holding Corp (VHC) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1199%, VHC: +82. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VHC and IDCC and QCOM and ACTG and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (VHC (Technology) and IDCC (Technology) and QCOM (Technology) and ACTG (Industrials) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ACTG is a small-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. IDCC, QCOM pay a dividend while VHC, ACTG, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.