Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VXRT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs IBRX vs PFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
VXRT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs IBRX vs PFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $178M | $1.50B | $19.25B | $7.64B | $150.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $237M | $596M | $2.23B | $83M | $63.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $-88M | $-3.19B | $-349M | $7.49B |
| Gross Margin | 90.4% | 84.6% | -13.9% | 94.8% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | -11.2% | -153.3% | -315.8% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 3.6x | — | — | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $249M | $1.92B | $504M | $67.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $54M | $241M | $2.60B | $143M | $1.14B |
VXRT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs IBRX vs PFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vaxart, Inc. (VXRT) | 100 | 27.6 | -72.4% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 20.0 | -80.0% |
| Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
| ImmunityBio, Inc. (IBRX) | 100 | 115.1 | +15.1% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 73.1 | -26.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VXRT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs IBRX vs PFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VXRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 10.2%, current ratio 5.34x
- Beta 0.77, current ratio 5.34x
- 9.1% ROA vs IBRX's -93.2%
NVAX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, MRNA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IBRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 22.7% revenue growth vs MRNA's -39.2%
- +310.6% vs PFE's +23.7%
PFE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- 29.6% 10Y total return vs MRNA's 161.0%
- 11.8% margin vs IBRX's -422.3%
- Beta 0.54 vs IBRX's 2.21
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs MRNA's -39.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs IBRX's -422.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs IBRX's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +310.6% vs PFE's +23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.1% ROA vs IBRX's -93.2% |
VXRT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs IBRX vs PFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VXRT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs IBRX vs PFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PFE leads in 4 of 6 categories
VXRT leads 1 • NVAX leads 0 • MRNA leads 0 • IBRX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.3B annually — 766.9x IBRX's $83M. PFE is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IBRX's -4.2%. On growth, VXRT holds the edge at +5.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $237M | $596M | $2.2B | $83M | $63.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | -$47M | -$3.2B | -$245M | $21.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | -$88M | -$3.2B | -$349M | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8M | -$96M | -$1.6B | -$324M | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.4% | +84.6% | -13.9% | +94.8% | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | -11.2% | -153.3% | -3.2% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | -14.7% | -143.6% | -4.2% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | -16.1% | -71.1% | -3.9% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.9% | -79.1% | +2.6% | +4.3% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | -102.0% | -34.9% | +40.8% | -9.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 81% valuation discount to PFE's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFE's 10.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $178M | $1.5B | $19.3B | $7.6B | $150.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $133M | $1.5B | $18.6B | $8.0B | $216.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.57x | 3.63x | -6.69x | -12.52x | 19.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 8.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.37x | 2.56x | — | — | 10.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 1.34x | 9.90x | 518.37x | 2.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.94x | — | 2.18x | — | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.51x | — | — | — | 16.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VXRT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VXRT delivers a 33.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MRNA. VXRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFE's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VXRT scores 7/9 vs MRNA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +33.8% | — | -36.7% | — | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.1% | -7.4% | -26.6% | -93.2% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.1% | — | -26.1% | — | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.1% | +100.4% | -27.6% | -88.9% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | — | 0.22x | — | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$45M | $8M | -$679M | $361M | $66.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54M | $241M | $2.6B | $143M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $249M | $1.9B | $504M | $67.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -5.10x | -1803.00x | -2.48x | 4.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NVAX and IBRX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFE five years ago would be worth $8,674 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $524 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, IBRX leads with a +310.6% total return vs PFE's +23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVAX at 7.4% vs MRNA's -28.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +105.6% | +29.5% | +57.3% | +284.2% | +6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +90.4% | +55.1% | +101.7% | +310.6% | +23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.0% | +23.9% | -63.2% | +21.1% | -18.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.7% | -94.8% | -70.2% | -53.6% | -13.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | -90.4% | +161.0% | -7.5% | +29.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.9% | +7.4% | -28.3% | +6.6% | -6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFE is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IBRX's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs IBRX's 62.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 2.11x | 1.82x | 2.21x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.84 | $11.97 | $59.55 | $12.43 | $28.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.26 | $5.80 | $22.28 | $1.83 | $21.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.1% | +77.1% | +81.5% | +62.4% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.1 | 64.4 | 47.0 | 59.4 | 44.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 259K | 4.4M | 6.9M | 20.4M | 33.3M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VXRT as "Buy", NVAX as "Buy", MRNA as "Hold", IBRX as "Buy", PFE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 170.3% upside for VXRT (target: $2) vs -25.8% for MRNA (target: $36). PFE is the only dividend payer here at 6.49% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $18.00 | $36.00 | $13.50 | $27.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 23 | 27 | 5 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PFE leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VXRT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
VXRT vs NVAX vs MRNA vs IBRX vs PFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VXRT or NVAX or MRNA or IBRX or PFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ImmunityBio, Inc.
(IBRX) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vaxart, Inc. (VXRT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VXRT or NVAX or MRNA or IBRX or PFE?
On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus Pfizer Inc. at 19. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VXRT or NVAX or MRNA or IBRX or PFE?
Over the past 5 years, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) delivered a total return of -13. 3%, compared to -94. 8% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRNA returned +161. 0% versus VXRT's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VXRT or NVAX or MRNA or IBRX or PFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus ImmunityBio, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning IBRX is approximately 307% more volatile than PFE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vaxart, Inc. (VXRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 78% for Pfizer Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VXRT or NVAX or MRNA or IBRX or PFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ImmunityBio, Inc.
(IBRX) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -39. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -3. 5% for Pfizer Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VXRT leads at 1204% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VXRT or NVAX or MRNA or IBRX or PFE?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -28. 0% for ImmunityBio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -23. 3% for IBRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBRX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VXRT or NVAX or MRNA or IBRX or PFE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VXRT: 170.
3% to $2. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VXRT or NVAX or MRNA or IBRX or PFE?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
5% yield) pays a dividend. VXRT, NVAX, MRNA, IBRX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VXRT or NVAX or MRNA or IBRX or PFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 6. 5% yield). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFE: +29. 6%, NVAX: -90. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VXRT and NVAX and MRNA and IBRX and PFE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VXRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MRNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IBRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. PFE pays a dividend while VXRT, NVAX, MRNA, IBRX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.