Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WABC vs PFSI vs RKT vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
Financial - Mortgages
Banks - Regional
WABC vs PFSI vs RKT vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Mortgages | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.38B | $4.62B | $39.90B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $311M | $4.36B | $6.88B | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $120M | $507M | $-68M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 94.3% | 91.4% | 91.6% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 60.8% | 34.6% | 8.7% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.3x | 7.2x | 21.3x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $138M | $23.06B | $0.00 | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $601M | $302M | $2.70B | $108M |
WABC vs PFSI vs RKT vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westamerica Bancorp… (WABC) | 100 | 90.1 | -9.9% |
| PennyMac Financial … (PFSI) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 56.0 | -44.0% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 111.6 | +11.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WABC vs PFSI vs RKT vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WABC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, Low D/E 15.5%, current ratio 0.39x
- PEG 1.05 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Beta 0.63, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.39x
PFSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs CVBF's 67.6%
- 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs WABC's -5.0%
RKT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +21.6% vs PFSI's -8.0%
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WABC's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs WABC's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.3x vs 14.2x), PEG 1.05 vs 4.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs RKT's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs RKT's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WABC's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.6% vs PFSI's -8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs RKT's 0.8% |
WABC vs PFSI vs RKT vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WABC vs PFSI vs RKT vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WABC leads in 4 of 6 categories
PFSI leads 0 • RKT leads 0 • CVBF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WABC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 22.1x WABC's $311M. WABC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RKT's -1.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $311M | $4.4B | $6.9B | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $171M | $1.0B | $639M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $120M | $507M | -$68M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $123M | -$3.8B | -$4.1B | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.3% | +91.4% | +91.6% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +60.8% | +34.6% | +8.7% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +44.6% | +11.5% | -1.0% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | -32.4% | -58.4% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.5% | +7.7% | -89.6% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WABC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, PFSI trades at a 29% valuation discount to CVBF's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WABC offers better value at 0.90x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $4.6B | $39.9B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $914M | $27.4B | $37.2B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.55x | 9.53x | -282.60x | 13.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.34x | 7.17x | 21.30x | 14.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.90x | — | — | 4.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.58x | 18.11x | 41.81x | 13.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.43x | 1.06x | 5.80x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.65x | 1.11x | 0.82x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.85x | — | — | 12.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WABC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WABC delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-1 for RKT. WABC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFSI's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVBF scores 6/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +12.0% | -0.6% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.8% | -0.2% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.1% | +4.4% | +2.0% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.3% | +10.4% | +1.6% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 5.35x | — | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$463M | $22.8B | -$2.7B | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $601M | $302M | $2.7B | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $138M | $23.1B | $0 | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.87x | 1.35x | 0.43x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PFSI and CVBF each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $16,366 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,811 for RKT. Over the past 12 months, RKT leads with a +21.6% total return vs PFSI's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.7% vs PFSI's 16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.7% | -32.4% | -28.9% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.9% | -8.0% | +21.6% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.4% | +59.2% | +77.3% | +94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | +63.7% | -11.9% | +12.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.8% | +603.4% | -20.7% | +67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.8% | +16.8% | +21.0% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
WABC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WABC is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RKT's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WABC currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs PFSI's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.93x | 1.85x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.22 | $160.36 | $24.36 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.93 | $82.67 | $11.08 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.6% | +55.3% | +58.0% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 40.4 | 45.8 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 190K | 604K | 25.0M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WABC and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WABC as "Hold", PFSI as "Buy", RKT as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for PFSI (target: $143) vs 3.9% for WABC (target: $57). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs PFSI's 1.31%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $143.00 | $21.63 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 20 | 25 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +1.3% | — | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 27 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.76 | $1.16 | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +2.9% |
WABC leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
WABC vs PFSI vs RKT vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WABC or PFSI or RKT or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WABC or PFSI or RKT or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus CVB Financial Corp. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Westamerica Bancorporation wins at 1. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WABC or PFSI or RKT or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) delivered a total return of +63. 7%, compared to -11. 9% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +603. 4% versus RKT's -13. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WABC or PFSI or RKT or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
61β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning RKT is approximately 205% more volatile than WABC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WABC or PFSI or RKT or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus -5. 0% for Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 59. 2% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WABC or PFSI or RKT or CVBF?
Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the more profitable company, earning 44.
6% net margin versus -1. 0% for Rocket Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 44. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WABC leads at 60. 8% versus 8. 7% for RKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WABC leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WABC or PFSI or RKT or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Westamerica Bancorporation (WABC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 05x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 21. 3x for Rocket Companies, Inc. — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFSI: 61. 3% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WABC or PFSI or RKT or CVBF?
In this comparison, CVBF (4.
0% yield), WABC (3. 2% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. RKT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WABC or PFSI or RKT or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
(PFSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 3% yield, +603. 4% 10Y return). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFSI: +603. 4%, RKT: -13. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WABC and PFSI and RKT and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WABC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. WABC, PFSI, CVBF pay a dividend while RKT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.