Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WAL vs EWBC vs FHN vs ZION vs CFG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
WAL vs EWBC vs FHN vs ZION vs CFG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $9.16B | $17.23B | $12.16B | $9.46B | $28.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.28B | $4.69B | $4.99B | $4.99B | $12.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $969M | $1.33B | $982M | $852M | $1.70B |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 60.1% | 67.3% | 61.2% | 57.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 37.4% | 25.7% | 20.3% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 8.7x | 11.8x | 11.7x | 9.9x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $6.48B | $3.17B | $4.57B | $4.37B | $12.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.60B | $656M | $961M | $3.50B | $11.24B |
WAL vs EWBC vs FHN vs ZION vs CFG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western Alliance Ba… (WAL) | 100 | 218.4 | +118.4% |
| East West Bancorp, … (EWBC) | 100 | 358.3 | +258.3% |
| First Horizon Corpo… (FHN) | 100 | 268.1 | +168.1% |
| Zions Bancorporatio… (ZION) | 100 | 194.3 | +94.3% |
| Citizens Financial … (CFG) | 100 | 272.3 | +172.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WAL vs EWBC vs FHN vs ZION vs CFG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.2%, EPS growth 23.1%
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 12.7x)
EWBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 289.6% 10Y total return vs CFG's 260.3%
- PEG 0.62 vs ZION's 2.81
- NIM 3.2% vs CFG's 2.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CFG's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
FHN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 2.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 50.0%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 1.10, yield 2.5%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 1.10 vs WAL's 1.72, lower leverage
ZION is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 8.0% NII/revenue growth vs FHN's 1.0%
CFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +76.5% vs WAL's +19.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% NII/revenue growth vs FHN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 12.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CFG's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs WAL's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs ZION's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.5% vs WAL's +19.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CFG's 0.4% |
WAL vs EWBC vs FHN vs ZION vs CFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WAL vs EWBC vs FHN vs ZION vs CFG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EWBC leads in 2 of 6 categories
WAL leads 1 • FHN leads 0 • ZION leads 0 • CFG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EWBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.3B annually — 2.6x EWBC's $4.7B. EWBC is the more profitable business, keeping 28.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CFG's 12.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $4.7B | $5.0B | $5.0B | $12.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $2.0B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $969M | $1.3B | $982M | $852M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.8B | $1.5B | $628M | $961M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.1% | +60.1% | +67.3% | +61.2% | +57.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +37.4% | +25.7% | +20.3% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +28.3% | +19.7% | +15.7% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -52.9% | +32.0% | +12.6% | +21.0% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | +21.4% | +79.3% | +8.0% | +38.2% |
Valuation Metrics
WAL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, WAL trades at a 56% valuation discount to CFG's 21.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EWBC offers better value at 0.69x vs ZION's 3.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.2B | $17.2B | $12.2B | $9.5B | $28.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.0B | $19.8B | $15.8B | $10.3B | $29.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.55x | 13.15x | 13.34x | 12.92x | 21.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.67x | 11.78x | 11.69x | 9.94x | 12.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.82x | 0.69x | — | 3.65x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.97x | 9.71x | 11.80x | 9.09x | 12.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 3.68x | 2.44x | 1.89x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.96x | 1.36x | 1.54x | 1.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.48x | 19.36x | 9.00x | 15.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EWBC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EWBC delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for CFG. EWBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAL's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EWBC scores 8/9 vs WAL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.8% | +15.8% | +10.7% | +12.4% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.7% | +1.2% | +1.0% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.5% | +11.2% | +7.0% | +7.3% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | +3.9% | +10.2% | +11.6% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.36x | 0.50x | 0.71x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | $2.5B | $3.6B | $866M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.6B | $656M | $961M | $3.5B | $11.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.5B | $3.2B | $4.6B | $4.4B | $12.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.66x | 1.01x | 0.82x | 0.68x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WAL and EWBC and CFG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EWBC five years ago would be worth $17,294 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,568 for WAL. Over the past 12 months, CFG leads with a +76.5% total return vs WAL's +19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAL at 47.6% vs FHN's 36.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.0% | +10.2% | +4.6% | +8.7% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.4% | +47.8% | +38.3% | +44.8% | +76.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +221.7% | +194.6% | +151.3% | +184.7% | +174.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.3% | +72.9% | +47.8% | +21.9% | +50.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.4% | +289.6% | +123.2% | +195.6% | +260.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.6% | +43.4% | +36.0% | +41.7% | +40.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EWBC and FHN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FHN is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAL's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EWBC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs WAL's 85.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.22x | 1.10x | 1.37x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.23 | $127.52 | $26.56 | $66.18 | $68.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.81 | $86.21 | $18.55 | $45.25 | $37.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.7% | +98.2% | +94.4% | +96.6% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 63.1 | 58.7 | 59.6 | 54.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.0M | 5.0M | 1.6M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EWBC and ZION each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WAL as "Buy", EWBC as "Buy", FHN as "Hold", ZION as "Hold", CFG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.7% upside for FHN (target: $28) vs 4.4% for EWBC (target: $131). For income investors, ZION offers the higher dividend yield at 2.63% vs EWBC's 1.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $87.83 | $130.67 | $28.00 | $67.83 | $72.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 24 | 35 | 50 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.9% | +2.5% | +2.6% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.69 | $2.40 | $0.63 | $1.68 | $1.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.7% | +7.5% | +4.3% | +4.8% |
EWBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
WAL vs EWBC vs FHN vs ZION vs CFG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WAL or EWBC or FHN or ZION or CFG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) is the stronger pick with 8.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WAL or EWBC or FHN or ZION or CFG?
On trailing P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, Western Alliance Bancorporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: East West Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus Zions Bancorporation, National Association's 2. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WAL or EWBC or FHN or ZION or CFG?
Over the past 5 years, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) delivered a total return of +72. 9%, compared to -14. 3% for Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EWBC returned +289. 6% versus FHN's +123. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WAL or EWBC or FHN or ZION or CFG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
10β versus Western Alliance Bancorporation's 1. 72β — meaning WAL is approximately 57% more volatile than FHN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 82% for Western Alliance Bancorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WAL or EWBC or FHN or ZION or CFG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) is pulling ahead at 8.
0% versus 1. 0% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Horizon Corporation grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to -3. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WAL or EWBC or FHN or ZION or CFG?
East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 12. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EWBC leads at 37. 4% versus 15. 3% for CFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WAL or EWBC or FHN or ZION or CFG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Zions Bancorporation, National Association's 2. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 7x for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FHN: 11. 7% to $28. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WAL or EWBC or FHN or ZION or CFG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 9% for East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC).
09Is WAL or EWBC or FHN or ZION or CFG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 22), 1. 9% yield, +289. 6% 10Y return). Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EWBC: +289. 6%, WAL: +168. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WAL and EWBC and FHN and ZION and CFG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WAL is a small-cap deep-value stock; EWBC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FHN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ZION is a small-cap deep-value stock; CFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.