Trucking
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WERN vs KNX vs JBHT vs ODFL vs SAIA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Trucking
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Trucking
Trucking
WERN vs KNX vs JBHT vs ODFL vs SAIA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Trucking | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Trucking | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $2.18B | $10.30B | $22.91B | $41.28B | $11.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.97B | $7.50B | $12.00B | $5.50B | $3.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $34M | $598M | $1.02B | $255M |
| Gross Margin | 8.3% | 30.6% | 14.0% | 32.2% | 18.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 2.9% | 7.2% | 24.8% | 10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 39.8x | 34.3x | 33.0x | 37.7x | 42.3x |
| Total Debt | $752M | $2.89B | $1.47B | $141M | $418M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $303M | $17M | $120M | $20M |
WERN vs KNX vs JBHT vs ODFL vs SAIA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Werner Enterprises,… (WERN) | 100 | 78.7 | -21.3% |
| Knight-Swift Transp… (KNX) | 100 | 152.4 | +52.4% |
| J.B. Hunt Transport… (JBHT) | 100 | 202.4 | +102.4% |
| Old Dominion Freigh… (ODFL) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
| Saia, Inc. (SAIA) | 100 | 414.0 | +314.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WERN vs KNX vs JBHT vs ODFL vs SAIA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WERN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 54.1%, current ratio 1.94x
- Beta 1.24, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.94x
- 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs JBHT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
KNX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.8%, EPS growth -43.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.2%
- 0.8% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5%
JBHT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 0.7%
- Lower P/E (33.0x vs 37.7x)
- Beta 1.07 vs SAIA's 1.90
- +83.5% vs ODFL's +28.0%
ODFL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 18.6% margin vs WERN's -0.5%
- 18.5% ROA vs WERN's -0.5%, ROIC 23.6% vs 2.5%
SAIA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 15.7% 10Y total return vs ODFL's 8.4%
- PEG 3.29 vs JBHT's 6.30
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.8% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.0x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs WERN's -0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs SAIA's 1.90 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs JBHT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.5% vs ODFL's +28.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs WERN's -0.5%, ROIC 23.6% vs 2.5% |
WERN vs KNX vs JBHT vs ODFL vs SAIA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WERN vs KNX vs JBHT vs ODFL vs SAIA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories
WERN leads 1 • SAIA leads 1 • KNX leads 0 • JBHT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBHT is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.0B annually — 4.0x WERN's $3.0B. ODFL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WERN's -0.5%. On growth, SAIA holds the edge at +2.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $7.5B | $12.0B | $5.5B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $343M | $1.0B | $1.6B | $1.7B | $602M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $34M | $598M | $1.0B | $255M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$69M | $1.3B | $948M | $955M | $261M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +30.6% | +14.0% | +32.2% | +18.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +2.9% | +7.2% | +24.8% | +10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +0.5% | +5.0% | +18.6% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +17.8% | +7.9% | +17.4% | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +1.4% | -1.6% | -5.7% | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | -104.3% | +24.2% | -11.4% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WERN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 39.6x trailing earnings, JBHT trades at a 74% valuation discount to KNX's 154.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ODFL offers better value at 3.66x vs JBHT's 7.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $10.3B | $22.9B | $41.3B | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.9B | $12.9B | $24.4B | $41.3B | $12.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -151.58x | 154.71x | 39.57x | 41.01x | 47.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.79x | 34.28x | 33.04x | 37.69x | 42.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 7.55x | 3.66x | 3.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.07x | 12.41x | 15.42x | 23.93x | 20.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 1.38x | 1.91x | 7.51x | 3.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 1.46x | 6.64x | 9.64x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.50x | 24.18x | 43.22x | 438.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-1 for WERN. ODFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WERN's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JBHT scores 7/9 vs WERN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.0% | +0.5% | +16.8% | +24.0% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | +0.3% | +7.5% | +18.5% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +2.0% | +12.0% | +23.6% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +2.3% | +13.5% | +27.1% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.41x | 0.41x | 0.03x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $692M | $2.6B | $1.4B | $21M | $398M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $303M | $17M | $120M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $752M | $2.9B | $1.5B | $141M | $418M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 1.36x | 12.19x | 4601.85x | 23.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SAIA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAIA five years ago would be worth $18,332 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,100 for WERN. Over the past 12 months, JBHT leads with a +83.5% total return vs ODFL's +28.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAIA at 16.0% vs WERN's -5.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.8% | +21.8% | +23.3% | +24.6% | +33.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.8% | +54.4% | +83.5% | +28.0% | +72.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.5% | +14.1% | +38.8% | +29.1% | +56.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.0% | +34.4% | +40.2% | +50.0% | +83.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.1% | +156.2% | +203.9% | +841.8% | +1567.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.8% | +4.5% | +11.5% | +8.9% | +16.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JBHT and SAIA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBHT is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIA's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAIA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs ODFL's 84.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.40x | 1.07x | 1.38x | 1.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.46 | $67.75 | $256.18 | $233.79 | $457.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.06 | $38.63 | $130.12 | $126.01 | $248.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +93.6% | +94.5% | +84.7% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.9 | 56.4 | 58.0 | 45.2 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 3.0M | 902K | 2.1M | 523K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WERN and JBHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WERN as "Hold", KNX as "Buy", JBHT as "Buy", ODFL as "Hold", SAIA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.1% upside for ODFL (target: $208) vs -7.1% for JBHT (target: $225). For income investors, WERN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.55% vs ODFL's 0.57%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.10 | $65.10 | $224.88 | $208.19 | $422.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 36 | 45 | 36 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +1.1% | +0.7% | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 8 | 12 | 10 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $0.72 | $1.75 | $1.12 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +0.1% |
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WERN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WERN vs KNX vs JBHT vs ODFL vs SAIA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WERN or KNX or JBHT or ODFL or SAIA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
(KNX) is the stronger pick with 0. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) offers the better valuation at 39. 6x trailing P/E (33. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (KNX) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WERN or KNX or JBHT or ODFL or SAIA?
On trailing P/E, J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is the cheapest at 39. 6x versus Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. at 154. 7x. On forward P/E, J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 33. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Saia, Inc. wins at 3. 29x versus J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. 's 6. 30x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WERN or KNX or JBHT or ODFL or SAIA?
Over the past 5 years, Saia, Inc.
(SAIA) delivered a total return of +83. 3%, compared to -19. 0% for Werner Enterprises, Inc. (WERN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAIA returned +1568% versus WERN's +78. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WERN or KNX or JBHT or ODFL or SAIA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus Saia, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning SAIA is approximately 78% more volatile than JBHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 54% for Werner Enterprises, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WERN or KNX or JBHT or ODFL or SAIA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.
(KNX) is pulling ahead at 0. 8% versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. grew EPS 10. 1% year-over-year, compared to -143. 6% for Werner Enterprises, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SAIA leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WERN or KNX or JBHT or ODFL or SAIA?
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus -0. 5% for Werner Enterprises, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODFL leads at 24. 8% versus 2. 3% for WERN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ODFL leads at 32. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WERN or KNX or JBHT or ODFL or SAIA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Saia, Inc. (SAIA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 29x versus J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. 's 6. 30x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) trades at 33. 0x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for Saia, Inc. — 9. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ODFL: 5. 1% to $208. 19.
08Which pays a better dividend — WERN or KNX or JBHT or ODFL or SAIA?
In this comparison, WERN (1.
5% yield), KNX (1. 1% yield), JBHT (0. 7% yield), ODFL (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SAIA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WERN or KNX or JBHT or ODFL or SAIA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +841. 8% 10Y return). Saia, Inc. (SAIA) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODFL: +841. 8%, SAIA: +1568%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WERN and KNX and JBHT and ODFL and SAIA?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
WERN, KNX, JBHT, ODFL pay a dividend while SAIA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.