Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WMG vs SONY vs WBD vs AAPL vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
Entertainment
Consumer Electronics
Entertainment
WMG vs SONY vs WBD vs AAPL vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Consumer Electronics | Entertainment | Consumer Electronics | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $16.21B | $118.61B | $67.98B | $4.22T | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.13B | $12.77T | $37.21B | $451.44B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $452M | $1.17T | $-2.15B | $122.58B | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 29.2% | 41.5% | 47.9% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 12.7% | 11.3% | -4.0% | 32.6% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 23.4x | 0.1x | 93.5x | 33.8x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.61B | $4.20T | $32.57B | $112.38B | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $532M | $2.98T | $4.57B | $35.93B | $9.03B |
WMG vs SONY vs WBD vs AAPL vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Warner Music Group … (WMG) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| Sony Group Corporat… (SONY) | 100 | 143.8 | +43.8% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 128.5 | +28.5% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 315.2 | +215.2% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 194.0 | +94.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WMG vs SONY vs WBD vs AAPL vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WMG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 2.4%
- 2.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
SONY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.01 vs AAPL's 1.89
- Lower P/E (0.1x vs 24.8x), PEG 0.01 vs 0.75
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6%
AAPL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
- 27.2% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
- 34.0% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 67.4% vs 1.5%
NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 24.8x), PEG 0.01 vs 0.75 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.2% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs SONY's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 67.4% vs 1.5% |
WMG vs SONY vs WBD vs AAPL vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WMG vs SONY vs WBD vs AAPL vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AAPL leads in 2 of 6 categories
SONY leads 1 • WMG leads 0 • WBD leads 0 • NFLX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AAPL and NFLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SONY is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.77T annually — 1791.2x WMG's $7.1B. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.1B | $12.77T | $37.2B | $451.4B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $2.60T | $7.5B | $160.0B | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $452M | $1.17T | -$2.2B | $122.6B | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $694M | $1.70T | $2.3B | $129.2B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +29.2% | +41.5% | +47.9% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.7% | +11.3% | -4.0% | +32.6% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +9.2% | -5.8% | +27.2% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +13.3% | +6.2% | +28.6% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | +7.0% | -1.0% | +16.6% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +7.8% | -5.5% | +21.8% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SONY leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.5x trailing earnings, SONY trades at a 82% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.2B | $118.6B | $68.0B | $4.22T | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.3B | $126.4B | $96.0B | $4.30T | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.34x | 16.55x | 93.52x | 38.53x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.45x | 0.10x | — | 33.78x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.08x | — | 2.16x | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.55x | 11.02x | 13.73x | 29.68x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.42x | 1.43x | 1.82x | 10.14x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.28x | 2.22x | 1.85x | 58.49x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.08x | 11.08x | 22.02x | 42.72x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. SONY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMG's 6.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SONY scores 8/9 vs WMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +55.9% | +14.6% | -5.9% | +146.7% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +3.2% | -2.2% | +34.0% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +10.7% | +1.5% | +67.4% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.8% | +5.8% | +1.5% | +69.6% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.09x | 0.49x | 0.88x | 1.52x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.1B | $1.22T | $28.0B | $76.4B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $532M | $2.98T | $4.6B | $35.9B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $4.20T | $32.6B | $112.4B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.43x | 22.32x | 3.56x | — | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,220 for WBD. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs SONY's 3.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | -23.1% | -4.9% | +6.2% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.6% | -20.2% | +216.8% | +47.0% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.4% | +9.3% | +101.5% | +67.4% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.2% | +5.3% | -27.8% | +124.4% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.3% | +333.4% | -3.7% | +1174.1% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.2% | +3.0% | +26.3% | +18.7% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AAPL and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SONY's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs SONY's 65.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.02x | 0.90x | 0.99x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.63 | $30.34 | $30.00 | $292.13 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.34 | $19.63 | $8.06 | $193.25 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +65.6% | +90.4% | +98.4% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.2 | 51.7 | 48.9 | 69.4 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 5.5M | 22.2M | 39.8M | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMG and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMG as "Buy", SONY as "Buy", WBD as "Hold", AAPL as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.8% upside for SONY (target: $30) vs 10.3% for AAPL (target: $317). For income investors, WMG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.38% vs AAPL's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.50 | $30.00 | $29.94 | $317.11 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 16 | 32 | 110 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +0.6% | — | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 5 | 1 | 14 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.74 | $18.97 | — | $1.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.5% | 0.0% | +2.1% | +2.4% |
AAPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SONY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
WMG vs SONY vs WBD vs AAPL vs NFLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WMG or SONY or WBD or AAPL or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Sony Group Corporation (SONY) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WMG or SONY or WBD or AAPL or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Sony Group Corporation (SONY) is the cheapest at 16.
5x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, Sony Group Corporation is actually cheaper at 0. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sony Group Corporation wins at 0. 01x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WMG or SONY or WBD or AAPL or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -27. 8% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus WBD's -3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WMG or SONY or WBD or AAPL or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Sony Group Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SONY is approximately 163% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sony Group Corporation (SONY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 6% for Warner Music Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WMG or SONY or WBD or AAPL or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. grew EPS 106. 3% year-over-year, compared to -16. 7% for Warner Music Group Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WMG or SONY or WBD or AAPL or NFLX?
Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32. 0% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WMG or SONY or WBD or AAPL or NFLX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sony Group Corporation (SONY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sony Group Corporation (SONY) trades at 0. 1x forward P/E versus 33. 8x for Apple Inc. — 33. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SONY: 50. 8% to $30. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WMG or SONY or WBD or AAPL or NFLX?
In this comparison, WMG (2.
4% yield), SONY (0. 6% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. WBD, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WMG or SONY or WBD or AAPL or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, WBD: -3. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WMG and SONY and WBD and AAPL and NFLX?
These companies operate in different sectors (WMG (Communication Services) and SONY (Technology) and WBD (Communication Services) and AAPL (Technology) and NFLX (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WMG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SONY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. WMG, SONY pay a dividend while WBD, AAPL, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.