Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WNEB vs CFFI vs MNSB vs FXNC vs NKSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
WNEB vs CFFI vs MNSB vs FXNC vs NKSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $285M | $252M | $176M | $253M | $240M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $130M | $186M | $136M | $112M | $85M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $27M | $16M | $18M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 62.0% | 69.5% | 54.4% | 74.0% | 65.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.9% | 17.8% | 14.0% | 19.6% | 22.5% |
| Forward P/E | 14.3x | 7.5x | 10.4x | 11.7x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $106M | $116M | $70M | $43M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $14M | $25M | $161M | $8M |
WNEB vs CFFI vs MNSB vs FXNC vs NKSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Western New England… (WNEB) | 100 | 266.9 | +166.9% |
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| National Bankshares… (NKSH) | 100 | 122.4 | +22.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WNEB vs CFFI vs MNSB vs FXNC vs NKSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WNEB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +53.5% vs CFFI's +24.3%
CFFI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.4%
- 144.1% 10Y total return vs FXNC's 241.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 44.1%, current ratio 24.17x
- PEG 1.16 vs FXNC's 7.87
MNSB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5%
FXNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs NKSH's 4.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, NKSH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.7x), PEG 1.16 vs 145.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs WNEB's 0.80 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs NKSH's 4.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs CFFI's +24.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
WNEB vs CFFI vs MNSB vs FXNC vs NKSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
WNEB vs CFFI vs MNSB vs FXNC vs NKSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FXNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
CFFI leads 1 • NKSH leads 1 • WNEB leads 1 • MNSB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $186M annually — 2.2x NKSH's $85M. NKSH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $130M | $186M | $136M | $112M | $85M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $36M | $23M | $25M | $20M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $27M | $16M | $18M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $22M | $13M | $21M | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.0% | +69.5% | +54.4% | +74.0% | +65.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +17.8% | +14.0% | +19.6% | +22.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +14.4% | +11.5% | +15.8% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +11.9% | +7.8% | +18.7% | +17.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.5% | +10.7% | +120.9% | +7.1% | +91.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CFFI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 50% valuation discount to WNEB's 18.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CFFI offers better value at 1.45x vs NKSH's 145.48x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $285M | $252M | $176M | $253M | $240M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $353M | $354M | $221M | $134M | $234M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.79x | 9.35x | 13.36x | 14.27x | 15.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.28x | 7.51x | 10.45x | 11.75x | 11.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.75x | 1.45x | — | 9.55x | 145.48x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.67x | 10.72x | 11.58x | 6.13x | 12.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 1.36x | 1.30x | 2.25x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 0.96x | 0.82x | 1.35x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.65x | 11.38x | 16.57x | 12.03x | 15.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NKSH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CFFI delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for WNEB. NKSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFI's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WNEB scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +10.8% | +7.3% | +10.0% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +1.0% | +0.7% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +6.8% | +5.0% | +7.7% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +2.1% | +0.9% | +9.9% | +1.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.44x | 0.32x | 0.23x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $68M | $102M | $45M | -$118M | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $14M | $25M | $161M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $106M | $116M | $70M | $43M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.40x | 0.73x | 0.31x | 0.84x | 0.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WNEB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFFI five years ago would be worth $19,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,056 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, WNEB leads with a +53.5% total return vs CFFI's +24.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WNEB at 35.4% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.7% | +10.3% | +19.4% | +14.6% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.5% | +24.3% | +26.4% | +46.9% | +49.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +148.0% | +66.5% | +21.5% | +110.8% | +55.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.0% | +95.4% | +20.6% | +68.7% | +31.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.3% | +144.1% | +126.9% | +241.1% | +51.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.4% | +18.5% | +6.7% | +28.2% | +15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WNEB and CFFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CFFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WNEB's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WNEB currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs MNSB's 93.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.61x | 0.66x | 0.70x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.52 | $80.99 | $25.17 | $29.85 | $40.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.53 | $57.09 | $17.86 | $18.31 | $24.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +95.7% | +93.4% | +93.7% | +94.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 46.5 | 50.4 | 47.6 | 51.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 64K | 4K | 58K | 80K | 50K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FXNC and NKSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WNEB as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", FXNC as "Buy", NKSH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for WNEB (target: $16) vs -24.9% for FXNC (target: $21). For income investors, NKSH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs WNEB's 2.01%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.50 | — | — | $21.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | — | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.4% | — | +2.2% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $1.84 | — | $0.61 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
FXNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CFFI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WNEB vs CFFI vs MNSB vs FXNC vs NKSH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WNEB or CFFI or MNSB or FXNC or NKSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Western New England Bancorp, Inc. (WNEB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WNEB or CFFI or MNSB or FXNC or NKSH?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus Western New England Bancorp, Inc. at 18. 8x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: C&F Financial Corporation wins at 1. 16x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 145. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WNEB or CFFI or MNSB or FXNC or NKSH?
Over the past 5 years, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) delivered a total return of +95.
4%, compared to +20. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus NKSH's +51. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WNEB or CFFI or MNSB or FXNC or NKSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
61β versus Western New England Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 80β — meaning WNEB is approximately 32% more volatile than CFFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 44% for C&F Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WNEB or CFFI or MNSB or FXNC or NKSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 33. 9% for Western New England Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WNEB or CFFI or MNSB or FXNC or NKSH?
National Bankshares, Inc.
(NKSH) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NKSH leads at 22. 5% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WNEB or CFFI or MNSB or FXNC or NKSH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 145. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 3x for Western New England Bancorp, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WNEB: 10. 0% to $15. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WNEB or CFFI or MNSB or FXNC or NKSH?
In this comparison, NKSH (4.
0% yield), CFFI (2. 4% yield), FXNC (2. 2% yield), WNEB (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WNEB or CFFI or MNSB or FXNC or NKSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
61), 2. 4% yield, +144. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFFI: +144. 1%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WNEB and CFFI and MNSB and FXNC and NKSH?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WNEB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CFFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. WNEB, CFFI, FXNC, NKSH pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.