Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WSBC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs NBTB vs CBSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
WSBC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs NBTB vs CBSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.29B | $699M | $4.61B | $2.35B | $7.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.43B | $315M | $739M | $867M | $2.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $223M | $69M | $243M | $169M | $566M |
| Gross Margin | 62.9% | 69.6% | 70.8% | 72.1% | 80.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 25.8% | 36.8% | 25.3% | 34.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 9.6x | 15.9x | 10.8x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.66B | $117M | $197M | $327M | $3.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $205M | $52M | $763M | $185M | $803M |
WSBC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs NBTB vs CBSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) | 100 | 159.7 | +59.7% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Commerce Bancshares… (CBSH) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WSBC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs NBTB vs CBSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WSBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 4.1%
- 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 10.8x)
- 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CBSH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 1.15 vs FFIN's 3.05
- NIM 3.4% vs WSBC's 2.9%
- Beta 0.70 vs WSBC's 0.97
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs WSBC's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.9% vs CBSH's -13.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
WSBC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs NBTB vs CBSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WSBC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs NBTB vs CBSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 2 • WSBC leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • CBSH leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBSH is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 6.8x IBCP's $315M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSBC's 15.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $315M | $739M | $867M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $311M | $89M | $310M | $241M | $796M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $223M | $69M | $243M | $169M | $566M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $262M | $70M | $290M | $225M | $570M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.9% | +69.6% | +70.8% | +72.1% | +80.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +25.8% | +36.8% | +25.3% | +34.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +21.7% | +30.2% | +19.5% | +26.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +22.2% | +39.6% | +25.2% | +27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.3% | +2.3% | -7.7% | +39.5% | +1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 50% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CBSH offers better value at 1.14x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $699M | $4.6B | $2.4B | $7.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $764M | $4.0B | $2.5B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.13x | 10.38x | 20.76x | 13.53x | 12.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.54x | 9.56x | 15.92x | 10.80x | 13.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.02x | 1.97x | 3.98x | 1.92x | 1.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.25x | 9.39x | 14.17x | 10.35x | 12.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.29x | 2.22x | 6.23x | 2.71x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 1.41x | 2.89x | 1.21x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.74x | 9.96x | 15.73x | 10.75x | 13.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBSH delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for WSBC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBSH's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WSBC scores 8/9 vs CBSH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | +14.2% | +13.3% | +9.5% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.3% | +1.6% | +1.1% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +10.2% | +11.0% | +7.9% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +2.6% | +16.0% | +2.4% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.23x | 0.12x | 0.17x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $65M | -$566M | $142M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $205M | $52M | $763M | $185M | $803M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $117M | $197M | $327M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | 0.91x | 1.48x | 1.05x | 1.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, WSBC leads with a +17.9% total return vs CBSH's -13.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs CBSH's 6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.7% | +7.2% | +8.5% | +9.3% | +1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.9% | +12.6% | -3.2% | +9.0% | -13.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.2% | +130.6% | +29.1% | +54.1% | +20.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.8% | +63.7% | -28.2% | +29.9% | -12.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.3% | +184.6% | +145.4% | +102.2% | +103.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +32.1% | +8.9% | +15.5% | +6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and CBSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSBC's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs CBSH's 79.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.83x | 0.95x | 0.89x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.10 | $37.39 | $38.74 | $46.92 | $66.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.18 | $29.63 | $28.11 | $39.20 | $46.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.8% | +90.8% | +83.6% | +96.1% | +79.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 50.6 | 58.2 | 57.3 | 61.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 583K | 176K | 740K | 236K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
WSBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WSBC as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CBSH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for WSBC (target: $42) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, WSBC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.08% vs CBSH's 2.06%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.50 | $38.00 | $39.25 | $46.00 | $58.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 7 | 15 | 10 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +3.0% | +2.2% | +3.2% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $1.03 | $0.72 | $1.43 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +2.7% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IBCP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
WSBC vs IBCP vs FFIN vs NBTB vs CBSH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WSBC or IBCP or FFIN or NBTB or CBSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is the stronger pick with 51. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WSBC or IBCP or FFIN or NBTB or CBSH?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, WesBanco, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Commerce Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 15x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WSBC or IBCP or FFIN or NBTB or CBSH?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus WSBC's +48. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WSBC or IBCP or FFIN or NBTB or CBSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus WesBanco, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning WSBC is approximately 37% more volatile than CBSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 79% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WSBC or IBCP or FFIN or NBTB or CBSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is pulling ahead at 51. 4% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for WesBanco, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WSBC or IBCP or FFIN or NBTB or CBSH?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 15. 5% for WesBanco, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 19. 7% for WSBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBSH leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WSBC or IBCP or FFIN or NBTB or CBSH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WSBC: 21. 3% to $41. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WSBC or IBCP or FFIN or NBTB or CBSH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 1% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH).
09Is WSBC or IBCP or FFIN or NBTB or CBSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 2. 1% yield, +103. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBSH: +103. 4%, WSBC: +48. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WSBC and IBCP and FFIN and NBTB and CBSH?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WSBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CBSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.