WSC vs H

For growth investors, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is the stronger pick with 117.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). Analysts rate WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) delivered a total return of +117.

0%, compared to -18. 6% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: H returned +254. 3% versus WSC's +145. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

39β versus WillScot Holdings Corporation's 2. 06β — meaning WSC is approximately 48% more volatile than H relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 131% versus 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is pulling ahead at 117.

0% versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hyatt Hotels Corporation grew EPS -104. 3% year-over-year, compared to -293. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, H leads at 29. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is the more profitable company, earning -0.

7% net margin versus -2. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps -0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSC leads at 21. 4% versus 7. 8% for H. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSC leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) trades at 22.

2x forward P/E versus 52. 6x for Hyatt Hotels Corporation — 30. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for H: 12. 7% to $190. 80.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 4% for Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+254.

3% 10Y return). WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (H: +254. 3%, WSC: +145. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (WSC (Industrials) and H (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; H is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WSC pays a dividend while H does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.