Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
WSO vs BLDR vs IBP vs MSM vs FAST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Residential Construction
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
WSO vs BLDR vs IBP vs MSM vs FAST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Construction | Residential Construction | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $17.45B | $8.79B | $5.84B | $5.82B | $50.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.24B | $14.82B | $2.95B | $3.81B | $8.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $496M | $292M | $255M | $205M | $1.26B |
| Gross Margin | 28.4% | 29.9% | 33.9% | 40.7% | 45.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 4.2% | 12.7% | 8.4% | 20.2% |
| Forward P/E | 34.0x | 14.1x | 19.5x | 24.0x | 35.9x |
| Total Debt | $479M | $5.65B | $1.05B | $539M | $442M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $433M | $182M | $322M | $56M | $277M |
WSO vs BLDR vs IBP vs MSM vs FAST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Watsco, Inc. (WSO) | 100 | 241.3 | +141.3% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 381.9 | +281.9% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 337.3 | +237.3% |
| MSC Industrial Dire… (MSM) | 100 | 150.4 | +50.4% |
| Fastenal Company (FAST) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WSO vs BLDR vs IBP vs MSM vs FAST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WSO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 2.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MSM's 3.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BLDR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 35.9x), PEG 1.78 vs 4.62
IBP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs FAST's 338.1%
- PEG 0.80 vs FAST's 4.62
MSM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 3.3%
- +43.8% vs BLDR's -25.0%
FAST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 11.2%, current ratio 4.85x
- Beta 0.69, yield 2.0%, current ratio 4.85x
- 8.7% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.7% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 35.9x), PEG 1.78 vs 4.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MSM's 3.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.8% vs BLDR's -25.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.9% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 31.2% vs 6.4% |
WSO vs BLDR vs IBP vs MSM vs FAST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WSO vs BLDR vs IBP vs MSM vs FAST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FAST leads in 2 of 6 categories
BLDR leads 1 • IBP leads 1 • WSO leads 0 • MSM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FAST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 5.0x IBP's $2.9B. FAST is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, FAST holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.2B | $14.8B | $2.9B | $3.8B | $8.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $757M | $1.2B | $656M | $414M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $496M | $292M | $255M | $205M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $702M | $862M | $63M | $167M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +29.9% | +33.9% | +40.7% | +45.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +4.2% | +12.7% | +8.4% | +20.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +2.0% | +8.6% | +5.4% | +15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +5.8% | +2.1% | +4.4% | +12.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.1% | -10.1% | -3.5% | +4.0% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | -151.2% | -21.3% | +12.0% | +13.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.4x trailing earnings, BLDR trades at a 50% valuation discount to FAST's 40.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.92x vs FAST's 5.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.5B | $8.8B | $5.8B | $5.8B | $50.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.5B | $14.3B | $6.6B | $6.3B | $51.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.04x | 20.43x | 22.33x | 29.22x | 40.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 34.05x | 14.07x | 19.50x | 23.99x | 35.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.97x | 2.59x | 0.92x | — | 5.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.76x | 10.35x | 13.41x | 15.61x | 30.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 0.58x | 1.97x | 1.54x | 6.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.05x | 2.04x | 8.26x | 4.17x | 12.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.59x | 10.30x | 19.41x | 24.17x | 48.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FAST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. FAST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs MSM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.3% | +6.9% | +37.5% | +14.8% | +31.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | +2.6% | +12.2% | +8.2% | +24.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.6% | +6.4% | +20.7% | +12.3% | +31.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.0% | +8.5% | +22.6% | +17.5% | +39.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 1.30x | 1.48x | 0.39x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | $5.5B | $731M | $483M | $165M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $433M | $182M | $322M | $56M | $277M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $479M | $5.6B | $1.1B | $539M | $442M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.19x | 9.47x | 12.56x | 259.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FAST five years ago would be worth $18,132 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,874 for MSM. Over the past 12 months, MSM leads with a +43.8% total return vs BLDR's -25.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 25.6% vs BLDR's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.4% | -24.0% | -18.1% | +23.5% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.0% | -25.0% | +34.0% | +43.8% | +15.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.6% | -30.1% | +98.3% | +26.0% | +73.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.8% | +51.8% | +80.6% | +28.7% | +81.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +281.5% | +614.8% | +650.1% | +87.3% | +338.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.2% | -11.2% | +25.6% | +8.0% | +20.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSM and FAST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FAST is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSM currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.65x | 1.19x | 0.86x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $496.25 | $151.03 | $349.00 | $107.09 | $50.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $323.05 | $73.40 | $150.83 | $74.30 | $38.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.5% | +52.6% | +62.1% | +97.4% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 42.8 | 55.0 | 68.3 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 452K | 2.4M | 344K | 604K | 7.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WSO and MSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WSO as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", MSM as "Hold", FAST as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs -6.9% for WSO (target: $400). For income investors, MSM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.25% vs IBP's 1.49%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $399.80 | $109.92 | $293.00 | $97.75 | $46.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 43 | 27 | 28 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | — | +1.5% | +3.3% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $12.50 | — | $3.24 | $3.39 | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +4.7% | +3.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
FAST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
WSO vs BLDR vs IBP vs MSM vs FAST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WSO or BLDR or IBP or MSM or FAST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fastenal Company (FAST) is the stronger pick with 8.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WSO or BLDR or IBP or MSM or FAST?
On trailing P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is the cheapest at 20. 4x versus Fastenal Company at 40. 7x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 80x versus Fastenal Company's 4. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WSO or BLDR or IBP or MSM or FAST?
Over the past 5 years, Fastenal Company (FAST) delivered a total return of +81.
3%, compared to +28. 7% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +650. 1% versus MSM's +87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WSO or BLDR or IBP or MSM or FAST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fastenal Company (FAST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
69β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 138% more volatile than FAST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fastenal Company (FAST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WSO or BLDR or IBP or MSM or FAST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fastenal Company (FAST) is pulling ahead at 8.
7% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fastenal Company grew EPS 9. 0% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FAST leads at 5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WSO or BLDR or IBP or MSM or FAST?
Fastenal Company (FAST) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
3% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FAST leads at 20. 2% versus 5. 2% for BLDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FAST leads at 45. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WSO or BLDR or IBP or MSM or FAST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 80x versus Fastenal Company's 4. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 35. 9x for Fastenal Company — 21. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — WSO or BLDR or IBP or MSM or FAST?
In this comparison, MSM (3.
3% yield), WSO (2. 9% yield), FAST (2. 0% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. BLDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WSO or BLDR or IBP or MSM or FAST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fastenal Company (FAST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
69), 2. 0% yield, +338. 1% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FAST: +338. 1%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WSO and BLDR and IBP and MSM and FAST?
These companies operate in different sectors (WSO (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and MSM (Industrials) and FAST (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WSO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FAST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WSO, IBP, MSM, FAST pay a dividend while BLDR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.