Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WST vs GTLS vs ATR vs FBIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WST
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$23.20B
5Y Perf.+49.0%
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.93B
5Y Perf.+428.4%
ATR
AptarGroup, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.05B
5Y Perf.+12.3%
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-25.0%

WST vs GTLS vs ATR vs FBIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WST logoWST
GTLS logoGTLS
ATR logoATR
FBIN logoFBIN
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesIndustrial - MachineryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesConstruction
Market Cap$23.20B$9.93B$8.05B$4.68B
Revenue (TTM)$3.22B$4.26B$3.87B$3.36B
Net Income (TTM)$543M$40M$387M$195M
Gross Margin36.2%32.6%21.9%45.6%
Operating Margin20.7%8.5%13.0%10.6%
Forward P/E37.3x16.4x22.5x11.5x
Total Debt$417M$3.74B$1.53B$2.54B
Cash & Equiv.$791M$366M$402M$264M

WST vs GTLS vs ATR vs FBINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WST
GTLS
ATR
FBIN
StockMay 20May 26Return
West Pharmaceutical… (WST)100149.0+49.0%
Chart Industries, I… (GTLS)100528.4+428.4%
AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR)100112.3+12.3%
Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN)10075.0-25.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WST vs GTLS vs ATR vs FBIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WST leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. GTLS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WST
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
The Growth Play

WST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 6.3%, EPS growth 1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 13.1%, current ratio 3.02x
  • 6.3% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2%
  • 16.9% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.7% 10Y total return vs WST's 361.4%
  • Beta 0.56 vs FBIN's 1.61
Best for: long-term compounding
ATR
AptarGroup, Inc.
The Income Pick

ATR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 1.4%
  • PEG 1.75 vs WST's 4.51
  • Beta 0.66, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.62x
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Value Play

FBIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (11.5x vs 16.4x)
  • 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ATR's 1.4%
Best for: value and dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWST logoWST6.3% revenue growth vs FBIN's -3.2%
ValueFBIN logoFBINLower P/E (11.5x vs 16.4x)
Quality / MarginsWST logoWST16.9% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
Stability / SafetyGTLS logoGTLSBeta 0.56 vs FBIN's 1.61
DividendsFBIN logoFBIN2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ATR's 1.4%
Momentum (1Y)WST logoWST+51.4% vs FBIN's -16.8%
Efficiency (ROA)WST logoWST13.2% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 17.5% vs 7.4%

WST vs GTLS vs ATR vs FBIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Proprietary Products
81.1%$2.5B
Contract Manufactured Products
18.9%$582M
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Repair, Service And Leasing Segment
30.6%$1.3B
Heat Transfer Systems Segment
29.0%$1.2B
Specialty Products Segment
25.8%$1.1B
Cryo Tank Solutions Segment
14.6%$624M
ATRAptarGroup, Inc.
FY 2025
Pharma Segment
57.0%$1.7B
Beauty Segment
43.0%$1.3B
FBINFortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
FY 2025
Water Innovations
54.8%$2.4B
Outdoors Segment
29.6%$1.3B
Security Segment
15.5%$693M

WST vs GTLS vs ATR vs FBIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWSTLAGGINGATR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

GTLS and WST operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $3.2B in trailing revenue. WST is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, WST holds the edge at +21.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWST logoWSTWest Pharmaceutic…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.FBIN logoFBINFortune Brands In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.2B$4.3B$3.9B$3.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$794M$644M$801M$482M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$543M$40M$387M$195M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$458M$203M$325M$420M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+36.2%+32.6%+21.9%+45.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.7%+8.5%+13.0%+10.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+16.9%+0.9%+10.0%+5.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.2%+4.8%+8.4%+12.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.0%-2.5%+10.8%-106.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+56.1%-36.1%-4.3%-2.0%
WST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.8x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ATR offers better value at 1.65x vs WST's 5.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricWST logoWSTWest Pharmaceutic…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.FBIN logoFBINFortune Brands In…
Market CapShares × price$23.2B$9.9B$8.1B$4.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$22.8B$13.3B$9.2B$7.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS47.33x628.45x21.28x15.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.37.34x16.40x22.47x11.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate5.72x1.65x2.77x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple30.77x14.33x11.48x10.08x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.55x2.33x2.13x1.05x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.37x2.79x3.08x1.98x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF49.48x48.95x26.89x12.77x
FBIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

ATR delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. WST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIN scores 7/9 vs ATR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWST logoWSTWest Pharmaceutic…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.FBIN logoFBINFortune Brands In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.9%+1.2%+18.6%+8.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.2%+0.4%+7.6%+3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+17.5%+7.4%+10.7%+8.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+18.4%+8.6%+13.8%+9.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96557
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x1.11x0.56x1.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$375M$3.4B$1.1B$2.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$791M$366M$402M$264M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$417M$3.7B$1.5B$2.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3338.00x1.08x16.19x4.72x
WST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $12,951 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, WST leads with a +51.4% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.6% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWST logoWSTWest Pharmaceutic…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.FBIN logoFBINFortune Brands In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+16.6%+0.6%+2.9%-22.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+51.4%+37.6%-16.1%-16.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.6%+62.7%+7.4%-36.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-2.4%+29.5%-15.3%-54.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+361.4%+772.5%+83.3%-2.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.0%+17.6%+2.4%-13.9%
GTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWST logoWSTWest Pharmaceutic…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.FBIN logoFBINFortune Brands In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.92x0.56x0.66x1.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$323.63$208.51$164.28$64.84
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$202.79$140.50$103.23$36.07
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.5%+99.5%+76.2%+60.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10073.251.242.846.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded835K1.6M473K2.6M
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ATR and FBIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: WST as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", ATR as "Buy", FBIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for FBIN (target: $60) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs WST's 0.26%.

MetricWST logoWSTWest Pharmaceutic…GTLS logoGTLSChart Industries,…ATR logoATRAptarGroup, Inc.FBIN logoFBINFortune Brands In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$315.83$193.81$169.67$59.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts14371827
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+0.3%+1.4%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises251332
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.84$0.60$1.81$1.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.6%0.0%+4.5%+5.3%
Evenly matched — ATR and FBIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GTLS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallWest Pharmaceutical Service… (WST)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WST vs GTLS vs ATR vs FBIN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WST or GTLS or ATR or FBIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.

(WST) is the stronger pick with 6. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (WST) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WST or GTLS or ATR or FBIN?

On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.

(FBIN) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AptarGroup, Inc. wins at 1. 75x versus West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 's 4. 51x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WST or GTLS or ATR or FBIN?

Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) delivered a total return of +29. 5%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus FBIN's -2. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WST or GTLS or ATR or FBIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 188% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (WST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WST or GTLS or ATR or FBIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.

(WST) is pulling ahead at 6. 3% versus -3. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AptarGroup, Inc. grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WST or GTLS or ATR or FBIN?

West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.

(WST) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WST leads at 20. 1% versus 11. 6% for FBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIN leads at 44. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WST or GTLS or ATR or FBIN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 75x versus West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 's 4. 51x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 37. 3x for West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. — 25. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 53. 1% to $59. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WST or GTLS or ATR or FBIN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 3% for West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (WST).

09

Is WST or GTLS or ATR or FBIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.

(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, FBIN: -2. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WST and GTLS and ATR and FBIN?

These companies operate in different sectors (WST (Healthcare) and GTLS (Industrials) and ATR (Healthcare) and FBIN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. ATR, FBIN pay a dividend while WST, GTLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WST

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GTLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FBIN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WST and GTLS and ATR and FBIN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WST: 21.0% · GTLS: -2.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WST: 47.3x · GTLS: 628.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.