Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XCH
XCHG Limited American Depositary Share

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • KY
Market Cap$59M
5Y Perf.-90.2%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-47.9%
CANG
Cango Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-39.7%
BZUN
Baozun Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$165M
5Y Perf.-22.9%
FINV
FinVolution Group

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • CN
Market Cap$2.90B
5Y Perf.-17.2%

XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XCH logoXCH
BTBT logoBTBT
CANG logoCANG
BZUN logoBZUN
FINV logoFINV
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryFinancial - Capital MarketsAuto - DealershipsSpecialty RetailFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$59M$589M$250M$165M$2.90B
Revenue (TTM)$42M$164M$3.46B$9.77B$13.07B
Net Income (TTM)$-8M$137M$-178M$-204M$2.80B
Gross Margin47.6%61.9%13.6%49.2%79.3%
Operating Margin-13.8%16.8%7.3%-0.5%19.4%
Forward P/E9.2x5.7x1.0x0.6x
Total Debt$10M$14M$170M$2.52B$34M
Cash & Equiv.$27M$95M$1.29B$1.64B$4.67B

XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XCH
BTBT
CANG
BZUN
FINV
StockSep 24May 26Return
XCHG Limited Americ… (XCH)1009.8-90.2%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10052.1-47.9%
Cango Inc. (CANG)10060.3-39.7%
Baozun Inc. (BZUN)10077.1-22.9%
FinVolution Group (FINV)10082.8-17.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT and FINV are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. FinVolution Group is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. XCH also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
XCH
XCHG Limited American Depositary Share
The Defensive Choice

XCH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.76 vs BTBT's 3.37
Best for: stability
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
  • -9.0% vs CANG's -73.7%
  • 19.0% ROA vs XCH's -20.6%
Best for: growth exposure
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • -44.9% 10Y total return vs FINV's -47.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
BZUN
Baozun Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, BZUN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
FINV
FinVolution Group
The Banking Pick

FINV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 4.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 4.31x
  • Beta 1.12, yield 4.8%, current ratio 4.31x
  • Lower P/E (0.6x vs 1.0x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
ValueFINV logoFINVLower P/E (0.6x vs 1.0x)
Quality / MarginsFINV logoFINV18.2% margin vs XCH's -17.9%
Stability / SafetyXCH logoXCHBeta 0.76 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsFINV logoFINV4.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BTBT logoBTBT-9.0% vs CANG's -73.7%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs XCH's -20.6%

XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XCHXCHG Limited American Depositary Share
FY 2024
Product
98.3%$42M
Service
1.7%$697,040
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
CANGCango Inc.
FY 2024
After-market Service Facilitation Service Income
62.9%$41M
Loan Facilitation Income And Other Related Income
24.1%$16M
Automobile trading income
9.6%$6M
Service, Other
3.4%$2M
BZUNBaozun Inc.
FY 2024
Service
63.2%$6.0B
Product
36.8%$3.5B
FINVFinVolution Group
FY 2024
Guarantee Income
48.6%$5.1B
Loan Facilitation Service Fees
44.8%$4.7B
Financial Service, Other
6.6%$692M

XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFINVLAGGINGCANG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FINV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FINV is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.1B annually — 309.0x XCH's $42M. FINV is the more profitable business, keeping 18.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XCH's -17.9%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.FINV logoFINVFinVolution Group
RevenueTrailing 12 months$42M$164M$3.5B$9.8B$13.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M$166M$333M-$4M$3.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8M$137M-$178M-$204M$2.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$448M$0$0$1.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.6%+61.9%+13.6%+49.2%+79.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.8%+16.8%+7.3%-0.5%+19.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-17.9%+17.3%-5.2%-2.1%+18.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-16.3%-65.3%-154.0%-1.1%+21.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.3%+4.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.8%+3.6%-29.2%-2.1%
FINV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BZUN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 3.9x trailing earnings, FINV trades at a 58% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BZUN's 15.4x.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.FINV logoFINVFinVolution Group
Market CapShares × price$59M$589M$250M$165M$2.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$43M$508M$85M$294M$2.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.00x9.15x5.66x-6.08x3.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.95x0.65x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.13x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x3.13x15.40x5.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.41x3.60x2.12x0.12x1.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.01x0.56x0.42x0.19x0.59x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.89x
BZUN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FINV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-40 for XCH. FINV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BZUN's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.FINV logoFINVFinVolution Group
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-40.5%+21.4%-4.1%-3.7%+17.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-20.6%+19.0%-2.3%-2.1%+11.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.5%+4.6%-1.3%+12.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-58.4%+8.5%+4.5%-1.7%+13.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956465
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.35x0.03x0.04x0.44x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$16M-$81M-$1.1B$879M-$4.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$27M$95M$1.3B$1.6B$4.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$14M$170M$2.5B$34M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-36.35x-1.87x-0.78x
FINV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FINV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FINV five years ago would be worth $9,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for BZUN. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -9.0% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FINV at 13.2% vs XCH's -48.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.FINV logoFINVFinVolution Group
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.7%-10.3%-62.0%-1.8%+3.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-18.7%-9.0%-73.7%-15.9%-35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.4%-19.7%+1.2%-40.4%+45.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.4%-84.6%-14.2%-91.6%-2.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.4%-60.4%-44.9%-49.3%-47.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-48.6%-7.1%+0.4%-15.8%+13.2%
FINV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — XCH and BZUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XCH is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BZUN currently trades 56.6% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.FINV logoFINVFinVolution Group
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.76x3.37x2.25x1.48x1.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.50$4.55$2.88$4.88$10.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.55$1.25$0.33$2.07$4.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+40.0%+40.2%+18.6%+56.6%+47.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.769.158.653.858.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded39K18.5M1.3M376K1.3M
Evenly matched — XCH and BZUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CANG and FINV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", CANG as "Buy", BZUN as "Buy", FINV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 16.0% for FINV (target: $6). For income investors, FINV offers the higher dividend yield at 4.80% vs BTBT's 0.31%.

MetricXCH logoXCHXCHG Limited Amer…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.FINV logoFINVFinVolution Group
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00$3.00$5.35$5.94
# AnalystsCovering analysts22134
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%+0.1%+4.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0504
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$0.02$1.67
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+5.3%+8.5%+3.3%
Evenly matched — CANG and FINV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FINV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BZUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallFinVolution Group (FINV)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). FinVolution Group (FINV) offers the better valuation at 3. 9x trailing P/E (0. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?

On trailing P/E, FinVolution Group (FINV) is the cheapest at 3.

9x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x. On forward P/E, FinVolution Group is actually cheaper at 0. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?

Over the past 5 years, FinVolution Group (FINV) delivered a total return of -2.

3%, compared to -91. 6% for Baozun Inc. (BZUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CANG returned -44. 9% versus XCH's -86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

76β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 342% more volatile than XCH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinVolution Group (FINV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 44% for Baozun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share. Over a 3-year CAGR, XCH leads at 47. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -28. 3% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -28. 5% for XCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FINV leads at 79. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, FinVolution Group (FINV) trades at 0.

6x forward P/E versus 1. 0x for Baozun Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?

In this comparison, FINV (4.

8% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. XCH, CANG, BZUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, FinVolution Group (FINV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

12), 4. 8% yield). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FINV: -47. 5%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between XCH and BTBT and CANG and BZUN and FINV?

These companies operate in different sectors (XCH (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and BZUN (Consumer Cyclical) and FINV (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: XCH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BZUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock. FINV pays a dividend while XCH, BTBT, CANG, BZUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XCH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CANG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 2916%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BZUN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FINV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform XCH and BTBT and CANG and BZUN and FINV on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(XCH: 9.6% · BTBT: 264.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.