Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Auto - Dealerships
Specialty Retail
Financial - Credit Services
XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Financial - Capital Markets | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $59M | $589M | $250M | $165M | $2.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $164M | $3.46B | $9.77B | $13.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $137M | $-178M | $-204M | $2.80B |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 61.9% | 13.6% | 49.2% | 79.3% |
| Operating Margin | -13.8% | 16.8% | 7.3% | -0.5% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.2x | 5.7x | 1.0x | 0.6x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $14M | $170M | $2.52B | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $95M | $1.29B | $1.64B | $4.67B |
XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XCHG Limited Americ… (XCH) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 52.1 | -47.9% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 60.3 | -39.7% |
| Baozun Inc. (BZUN) | 100 | 77.1 | -22.9% |
| FinVolution Group (FINV) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XCH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.76 vs BTBT's 3.37
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
- -9.0% vs CANG's -73.7%
- 19.0% ROA vs XCH's -20.6%
CANG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -44.9% 10Y total return vs FINV's -47.5%
Among these 5 stocks, BZUN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FINV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 4.31x
- Beta 1.12, yield 4.8%, current ratio 4.31x
- Lower P/E (0.6x vs 1.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.6x vs 1.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.2% margin vs XCH's -17.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs BTBT's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.0% vs CANG's -73.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs XCH's -20.6% |
XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FINV leads in 3 of 6 categories
BZUN leads 1 • XCH leads 0 • BTBT leads 0 • CANG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FINV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FINV is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.1B annually — 309.0x XCH's $42M. FINV is the more profitable business, keeping 18.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XCH's -17.9%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $164M | $3.5B | $9.8B | $13.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $166M | $333M | -$4M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $137M | -$178M | -$204M | $2.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$448M | $0 | $0 | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +61.9% | +13.6% | +49.2% | +79.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.8% | +16.8% | +7.3% | -0.5% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.9% | +17.3% | -5.2% | -2.1% | +18.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.3% | -65.3% | -154.0% | -1.1% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +58.3% | +4.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.8% | +3.6% | -29.2% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BZUN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.9x trailing earnings, FINV trades at a 58% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BZUN's 15.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $59M | $589M | $250M | $165M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43M | $508M | $85M | $294M | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.00x | 9.15x | 5.66x | -6.08x | 3.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 0.95x | 0.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.13x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.49x | 3.13x | 15.40x | 5.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 3.60x | 2.12x | 0.12x | 1.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.01x | 0.56x | 0.42x | 0.19x | 0.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 6.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FINV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-40 for XCH. FINV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BZUN's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs CANG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.5% | +21.4% | -4.1% | -3.7% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.6% | +19.0% | -2.3% | -2.1% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +6.5% | +4.6% | -1.3% | +12.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.4% | +8.5% | +4.5% | -1.7% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.03x | 0.04x | 0.44x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$16M | -$81M | -$1.1B | $879M | -$4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $95M | $1.3B | $1.6B | $4.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $14M | $170M | $2.5B | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.35x | — | -1.87x | -0.78x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FINV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FINV five years ago would be worth $9,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for BZUN. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -9.0% total return vs CANG's -73.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FINV at 13.2% vs XCH's -48.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.7% | -10.3% | -62.0% | -1.8% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.7% | -9.0% | -73.7% | -15.9% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | -19.7% | +1.2% | -40.4% | +45.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | -84.6% | -14.2% | -91.6% | -2.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | -60.4% | -44.9% | -49.3% | -47.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -48.6% | -7.1% | +0.4% | -15.8% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XCH and BZUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XCH is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BZUN currently trades 56.6% from its 52-week high vs CANG's 18.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 3.37x | 2.25x | 1.48x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $4.55 | $2.88 | $4.88 | $10.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.55 | $1.25 | $0.33 | $2.07 | $4.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.0% | +40.2% | +18.6% | +56.6% | +47.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 69.1 | 58.6 | 53.8 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 39K | 18.5M | 1.3M | 376K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CANG and FINV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", CANG as "Buy", BZUN as "Buy", FINV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 16.0% for FINV (target: $6). For income investors, FINV offers the higher dividend yield at 4.80% vs BTBT's 0.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 | $3.00 | $5.35 | $5.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 2 | 13 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% | — | +0.1% | +4.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 | — | $0.02 | $1.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.3% | +8.5% | +3.3% |
FINV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BZUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
XCH vs BTBT vs CANG vs BZUN vs FINV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). FinVolution Group (FINV) offers the better valuation at 3. 9x trailing P/E (0. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?
On trailing P/E, FinVolution Group (FINV) is the cheapest at 3.
9x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x. On forward P/E, FinVolution Group is actually cheaper at 0. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?
Over the past 5 years, FinVolution Group (FINV) delivered a total return of -2.
3%, compared to -91. 6% for Baozun Inc. (BZUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CANG returned -44. 9% versus XCH's -86. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), XCHG Limited American Depositary Share (XCH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 342% more volatile than XCH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FinVolution Group (FINV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 44% for Baozun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -11. 1% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share. Over a 3-year CAGR, XCH leads at 47. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -28. 3% for XCHG Limited American Depositary Share — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -28. 5% for XCH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FINV leads at 79. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FinVolution Group (FINV) trades at 0.
6x forward P/E versus 1. 0x for Baozun Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV?
In this comparison, FINV (4.
8% yield), BTBT (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. XCH, CANG, BZUN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XCH or BTBT or CANG or BZUN or FINV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FinVolution Group (FINV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 4. 8% yield). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FINV: -47. 5%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XCH and BTBT and CANG and BZUN and FINV?
These companies operate in different sectors (XCH (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and BZUN (Consumer Cyclical) and FINV (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XCH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BZUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FINV is a small-cap deep-value stock. FINV pays a dividend while XCH, BTBT, CANG, BZUN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.