REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Hotel & Motel
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $149.25B | $41.15B | $2.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.08B | $11.63B | $6.13B | $2.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $67M | $1.43B | $260M | $-215M |
| Gross Margin | -5.8% | 39.1% | -4.3% | -4.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 50.3x | 78.4x | 118.0x | 24.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.43B | $21.38B | $13.22B | $4.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $140M | $5.03B | $741M | $232M |
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xenia Hotels & Reso… (XHR) | 100 | 187.1 | +87.1% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Park Hotels & Resor… (PK) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XHR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 3.3%
- +54.1% vs PK's +21.9%
- 2.4% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 3.2% vs 2.2%
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs VTR's 65.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage
PK is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (24.4x vs 118.0x)
- 12.6% yield, vs XHR's 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.4x vs 118.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs PK's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 12.6% yield, vs XHR's 3.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.1% vs PK's +21.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 3.2% vs 2.2% |
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WELL leads in 2 of 6 categories
PK leads 1 • XHR leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 10.7x XHR's $1.1B. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PK's -8.5%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $11.6B | $6.1B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $243M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $612M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $67M | $1.4B | $260M | -$215M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +39.1% | -4.3% | -4.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +12.3% | +4.2% | -8.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +17.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +40.3% | +22.0% | -1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +117.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.3x trailing earnings, XHR trades at a 84% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PK's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $149.2B | $41.1B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $165.6B | $53.6B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.30x | 153.25x | 160.26x | -7.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 50.25x | 78.42x | 118.01x | 24.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.96x | 66.40x | 24.31x | 11.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 13.99x | 7.05x | 0.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 0.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.27x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 22.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XHR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XHR delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PK. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PK's 1.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XHR scores 7/9 vs PK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +3.5% | +2.1% | -6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +2.3% | +1.0% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.2% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 1.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $16.3B | $12.5B | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $140M | $5.0B | $741M | $232M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $21.4B | $13.2B | $4.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.79x | 0.26x | 1.40x | -0.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,280 for PK. Over the past 12 months, XHR leads with a +54.1% total return vs PK's +21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs PK's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.4% | +14.3% | +12.6% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.1% | +42.7% | +33.9% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.1% | +189.5% | +94.2% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.4% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -27.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.8% | +223.1% | +65.0% | -11.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | +42.5% | +24.8% | +7.2% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PK's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs PK's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.23 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $12.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.21 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $9.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.7% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +90.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 659K | 2.6M | 3.4M | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XHR and PK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XHR as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", PK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.3% upside for WELL (target: $227) vs 1.0% for XHR (target: $17). For income investors, PK offers the higher dividend yield at 12.57% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $11.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 34 | 32 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +12.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $1.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% |
WELL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XHR or WELL or VTR or PK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) offers the better valuation at 26. 3x trailing P/E (50. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK?
On trailing P/E, Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(XHR) is the cheapest at 26. 3x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -27. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus PK's -11. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning PK is approximately 13792% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 138% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 326. 7% year-over-year, compared to -240. 6% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -11. 1% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VTR leads at 14. 2% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XHR or WELL or VTR or PK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
(PK) trades at 24. 4x forward P/E versus 118. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 93. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WELL: 6. 3% to $226. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) offers the highest yield at 12. 6%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is XHR or WELL or VTR or PK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, PK: -11. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XHR and WELL and VTR and PK?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XHR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.