REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $1.55B | $149.25B | $41.15B | $2.25B | $14.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.08B | $11.63B | $6.13B | $2.53B | $6.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $67M | $1.43B | $260M | $-215M | $765M |
| Gross Margin | -5.8% | 39.1% | -4.3% | -4.7% | 39.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 11.1% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 50.3x | 78.4x | 118.0x | 24.4x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.43B | $21.38B | $13.22B | $4.26B | $5.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $140M | $5.03B | $741M | $232M | $768M |
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xenia Hotels & Reso… (XHR) | 100 | 187.1 | +87.1% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Park Hotels & Resor… (PK) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
| Host Hotels & Resor… (HST) | 100 | 181.5 | +81.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XHR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 3.3%
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs HST's 74.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2%
VTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.01 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage
PK is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 12.6% yield, vs XHR's 3.3%
HST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.04, yield 4.1%, current ratio 21.93x
- Lower P/E (19.8x vs 24.4x)
- 12.5% margin vs PK's -8.5%
- +54.9% vs PK's +21.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.8x vs 24.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.5% margin vs PK's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 12.6% yield, vs XHR's 3.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.9% vs PK's +21.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs 2.2% |
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HST leads in 2 of 6 categories
PK leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • XHR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HST leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 10.7x XHR's $1.1B. HST is the more profitable business, keeping 12.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PK's -8.5%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $11.6B | $6.1B | $2.5B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $243M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $612M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $67M | $1.4B | $260M | -$215M | $765M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $448M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +39.1% | -4.3% | -4.7% | +39.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +11.1% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +12.3% | +4.2% | -8.5% | +12.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +17.7% | +14.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.2% | +40.3% | +22.0% | -1.3% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +117.2% | +26.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, HST trades at a 88% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PK's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $149.2B | $41.1B | $2.3B | $14.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $165.6B | $53.6B | $6.3B | $19.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.30x | 153.25x | 160.26x | -7.88x | 19.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 50.25x | 78.42x | 118.01x | 24.41x | 19.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.96x | 66.40x | 24.31x | 11.17x | 12.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 13.99x | 7.05x | 0.89x | 2.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 0.72x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.27x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 22.08x | 17.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HST delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PK. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PK's 1.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HST scores 8/9 vs PK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +3.5% | +2.1% | -6.7% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +2.3% | +1.0% | -2.6% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.2% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +2.2% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +3.1% | +6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 1.38x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $16.3B | $12.5B | $4.0B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $140M | $5.0B | $741M | $232M | $768M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $21.4B | $13.2B | $4.3B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.79x | 0.26x | 1.40x | -0.01x | 4.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,280 for PK. Over the past 12 months, HST leads with a +54.9% total return vs PK's +21.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs PK's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.4% | +14.3% | +12.6% | +6.2% | +20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.1% | +42.7% | +33.9% | +21.9% | +54.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.1% | +189.5% | +94.2% | +23.4% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.4% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -27.2% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.8% | +223.1% | +65.0% | -11.4% | +74.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | +42.5% | +24.8% | +7.2% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PK's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs PK's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 1.32x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.23 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $12.39 | $22.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.21 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $9.84 | $14.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.7% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +90.3% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.9 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 52.1 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 659K | 2.6M | 3.4M | 3.9M | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XHR and PK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XHR as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", PK as "Hold", HST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.3% upside for WELL (target: $227) vs -7.7% for HST (target: $20). For income investors, PK offers the higher dividend yield at 12.57% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $11.50 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 34 | 32 | 25 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +12.6% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.56 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $1.41 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% | +1.4% |
HST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
XHR vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XHR or WELL or VTR or PK or HST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
On trailing P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the cheapest at 19. 7x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -27. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus PK's -11. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning PK is approximately 13792% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 138% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 326. 7% year-over-year, compared to -240. 6% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus -11. 1% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VTR leads at 14. 2% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XHR or WELL or VTR or PK or HST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 118. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 98. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WELL: 6. 3% to $226. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — XHR or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) offers the highest yield at 12. 6%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is XHR or WELL or VTR or PK or HST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, PK: -11. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XHR and WELL and VTR and PK and HST?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XHR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HST is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.