Integrated Freight & Logistics
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
XPO vs ORCL vs SAP vs ODFL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Trucking
XPO vs ORCL vs SAP vs ODFL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $24.00B | $563.33B | $202.40B | $41.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.30B | $64.08B | $36.80B | $5.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $348M | $16.21B | $7.04B | $1.02B |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 66.4% | 73.8% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 30.8% | 26.7% | 24.8% |
| Forward P/E | 41.9x | 26.2x | 23.7x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.70B | $104.10B | $8.07B | $141M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $310M | $10.79B | $8.22B | $120M |
XPO vs ORCL vs SAP vs ODFL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) | 100 | 750.0 | +650.0% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 364.4 | +264.4% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 135.6 | +35.6% |
| Old Dominion Freigh… (ODFL) | 100 | 231.8 | +131.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XPO vs ORCL vs SAP vs ODFL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XPO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 21.2% 10Y total return vs ODFL's 8.4%
- PEG 1.52 vs ORCL's 3.69
- +82.4% vs SAP's -38.9%
ORCL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.4%, EPS growth 17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
- 8.4% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5%
- 25.3% margin vs XPO's 4.2%
SAP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 17.8%, current ratio 1.17x
- Beta 0.85, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.17x
- Lower P/E (23.7x vs 37.1x)
ODFL is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 18.5% ROA vs XPO's 4.3%, ROIC 23.6% vs 9.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.4% revenue growth vs ODFL's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.7x vs 37.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.3% margin vs XPO's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs XPO's 1.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs ORCL's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.4% vs SAP's -38.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs XPO's 4.3%, ROIC 23.6% vs 9.3% |
XPO vs ORCL vs SAP vs ODFL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XPO vs ORCL vs SAP vs ODFL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ORCL leads in 1 of 6 categories
SAP leads 1 • ODFL leads 1 • XPO leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ORCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.1B annually — 11.7x ODFL's $5.5B. ORCL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XPO's 4.2%. On growth, ORCL holds the edge at +21.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.3B | $64.1B | $36.8B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $26.5B | $11.2B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $348M | $16.2B | $7.0B | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $457M | -$24.7B | $8.4B | $955M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +66.4% | +73.8% | +32.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +30.8% | +26.7% | +24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +25.3% | +19.1% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -38.6% | +22.8% | +17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.3% | +21.7% | +3.3% | -5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.1% | +24.5% | +15.4% | -11.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SAP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.7x trailing earnings, SAP trades at a 68% valuation discount to XPO's 77.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XPO offers better value at 2.80x vs ORCL's 6.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24.0B | $563.3B | $202.4B | $41.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.4B | $656.6B | $202.2B | $41.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 77.44x | 45.15x | 24.71x | 41.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.86x | 26.18x | 23.68x | 37.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.80x | 6.36x | 3.74x | 3.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.72x | 27.53x | 15.47x | 23.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.94x | 9.81x | 4.69x | 7.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 13.07x | 26.78x | 3.85x | 9.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.96x | — | 21.73x | 43.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 56.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $16 for SAP. ODFL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 4.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs XPO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.0% | +56.3% | +15.7% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +8.1% | +9.7% | +18.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +12.8% | +16.0% | +23.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | +14.4% | +18.2% | +27.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.53x | 4.96x | 0.18x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.4B | $93.3B | -$149M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $310M | $10.8B | $8.2B | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.7B | $104.1B | $8.1B | $141M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.21x | 5.44x | 8.49x | 4601.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XPO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XPO five years ago would be worth $39,892 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,560 for SAP. Over the past 12 months, XPO leads with a +82.4% total return vs SAP's -38.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPO at 61.6% vs ODFL's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.3% | +0.6% | -25.2% | +24.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.4% | +31.7% | -38.9% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +322.1% | +107.9% | +35.8% | +29.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +298.9% | +154.4% | +35.6% | +49.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2119.8% | +428.7% | +151.5% | +843.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +61.6% | +27.6% | +10.7% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XPO and SAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAP is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XPO's 1.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XPO currently trades 88.3% from its 52-week high vs SAP's 55.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 1.58x | 0.85x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $231.46 | $345.72 | $313.28 | $233.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $109.64 | $134.57 | $160.68 | $126.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +56.7% | +55.4% | +84.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 68.7 | 50.8 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 26.3M | 3.4M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ORCL and SAP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XPO as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy", SAP as "Buy", ODFL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 125.5% upside for SAP (target: $392) vs 3.5% for XPO (target: $212). For income investors, SAP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.51% vs ODFL's 0.57%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $211.60 | $257.09 | $391.67 | $208.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 86 | 43 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +1.5% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 18 | 2 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.65 | $2.24 | $1.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.3% | +1.1% | +1.8% |
ORCL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SAP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
XPO vs ORCL vs SAP vs ODFL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XPO or ORCL or SAP or ODFL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the stronger pick with 8.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). SAP SE (SAP) offers the better valuation at 24. 7x trailing P/E (23. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XPO or ORCL or SAP or ODFL?
On trailing P/E, SAP SE (SAP) is the cheapest at 24.
7x versus XPO Logistics, Inc. at 77. 4x. On forward P/E, SAP SE is actually cheaper at 23. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: XPO Logistics, Inc. wins at 1. 52x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 69x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XPO or ORCL or SAP or ODFL?
Over the past 5 years, XPO Logistics, Inc.
(XPO) delivered a total return of +298. 9%, compared to +35. 6% for SAP SE (SAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPO returned +21. 2% versus SAP's +151. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XPO or ORCL or SAP or ODFL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SAP SE (SAP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
85β versus XPO Logistics, Inc. 's 1. 72β — meaning XPO is approximately 102% more volatile than SAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XPO or ORCL or SAP or ODFL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is pulling ahead at 8.
4% versus -5. 5% for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SAP SE grew EPS 126. 0% year-over-year, compared to -18. 3% for XPO Logistics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ORCL leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XPO or ORCL or SAP or ODFL?
Oracle Corporation (ORCL) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus 3. 9% for XPO Logistics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ORCL leads at 30. 8% versus 8. 9% for XPO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SAP leads at 73. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XPO or ORCL or SAP or ODFL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 52x versus Oracle Corporation's 3. 69x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, SAP SE (SAP) trades at 23. 7x forward P/E versus 41. 9x for XPO Logistics, Inc. — 18. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 125. 5% to $391. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — XPO or ORCL or SAP or ODFL?
In this comparison, SAP (1.
5% yield), ORCL (0. 8% yield), ODFL (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. XPO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XPO or ORCL or SAP or ODFL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +843. 0% 10Y return). XPO Logistics, Inc. (XPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODFL: +843. 0%, XPO: +21. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XPO and ORCL and SAP and ODFL?
These companies operate in different sectors (XPO (Industrials) and ORCL (Technology) and SAP (Technology) and ODFL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
ORCL, SAP, ODFL pay a dividend while XPO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.