Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XTKG vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
Specialty Retail
XTKG vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $8M | $340.44B | $46.46B | $48.92B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $1.01T | $1.30T | $130.46B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-145M | $123.35B | $32.20B | $9.00B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 41.2% | 12.7% | 44.7% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -5.6% | 10.9% | 1.3% | -2.6% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.1x | 1.4x | 2.6x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $248.49B | $89.77B | $79.32B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $181.73B | $108.35B | $24.83B | $86.81B |
XTKG vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| X3 Holdings Co., Lt… (XTKG) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 60.5 | -39.5% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 54.4 | -45.6% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 104.6 | +4.6% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 170.5 | +70.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XTKG vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XTKG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 0.74x
- Beta 0.62 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage
BABA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
JD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.6%
- Beta 1.06, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.29x
- Lower P/E (1.4x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.05 vs 1.24
BIDU is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.04 vs AMZN's 1.24
- +61.3% vs XTKG's -99.7%
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs BABA's 83.4%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs XTKG's -31.0%
- 12.2% margin vs XTKG's -5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs XTKG's -31.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.05 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs XTKG's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.62 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.3% vs XTKG's -99.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs XTKG's -114.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs -60.1% |
XTKG vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XTKG vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories
JD leads 1 • XTKG leads 0 • BABA leads 0 • BIDU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 52496.2x XTKG's $25M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XTKG's -5.8%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $1.01T | $1.30T | $130.5B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$134M | $114.6B | $23.8B | $4.9B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$145M | $123.4B | $32.2B | $9.0B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $2.6B | $9.1B | -$15.7B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +41.2% | +12.7% | +44.7% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +10.9% | +1.3% | -2.6% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +12.2% | +2.5% | +6.9% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -32.0% | +0.3% | +0.7% | -12.0% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.2% | +4.8% | +14.9% | -7.1% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.5% | -52.0% | -56.3% | -2.6% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
JD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, JD trades at a 80% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIDU offers better value at 0.24x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $340.4B | $46.5B | $48.9B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $350.3B | $43.7B | $56.9B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.10x | 17.90x | 7.64x | 14.44x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.13x | 1.43x | 2.58x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.29x | 0.24x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.55x | 6.40x | 10.79x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 2.33x | 0.27x | 2.50x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 2.12x | 1.01x | 1.17x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.64x | 7.14x | 25.41x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-154 for XTKG. BABA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs XTKG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -153.8% | +11.2% | +10.5% | +3.1% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -114.6% | +6.7% | +4.6% | +2.0% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -60.1% | +9.6% | +9.9% | +4.8% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -85.1% | +10.4% | +10.2% | +6.3% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.23x | 0.29x | 0.28x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $66.8B | -$18.6B | $54.5B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $181.7B | $108.3B | $24.8B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $248.5B | $89.8B | $79.3B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -109.13x | 15.74x | 12.85x | 9.71x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for XTKG. Over the past 12 months, BIDU leads with a +61.3% total return vs XTKG's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs XTKG's -93.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.8% | -9.5% | +5.7% | -6.9% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.7% | +16.0% | -7.7% | +61.3% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +74.8% | -8.2% | +14.2% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -35.4% | -53.8% | -27.0% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +83.4% | +48.7% | -17.5% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.7% | +20.5% | -2.8% | +4.5% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XTKG and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XTKG is the less volatile stock with a 0.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs XTKG's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.62x | 1.21x | 1.06x | 1.41x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $489.60 | $192.67 | $38.08 | $165.30 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.12 | $103.71 | $24.51 | $81.17 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +73.2% | +79.3% | +84.6% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.4 | 61.8 | 58.0 | 69.1 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 10.4M | 10.1M | 2.0M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JD and BIDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BABA as "Buy", JD as "Buy", BIDU as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.8% upside for BABA (target: $194) vs 8.8% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs BABA's 1.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $194.23 | $32.86 | $154.70 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 | 45 | 53 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% | +2.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.14 | $5.37 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.8% | +8.2% | +1.9% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
XTKG vs BABA vs JD vs BIDU vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XTKG or BABA or JD or BIDU or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 0% for X3 Holdings Co. , Ltd. (XTKG). JD. com, Inc. (JD) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (1. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XTKG or BABA or JD or BIDU or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, JD. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Baidu, Inc. wins at 0. 04x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XTKG or BABA or JD or BIDU or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for X3 Holdings Co. , Ltd. (XTKG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus XTKG's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XTKG or BABA or JD or BIDU or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), X3 Holdings Co.
, Ltd. (XTKG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 62β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 144% more volatile than XTKG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XTKG or BABA or JD or BIDU or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -31. 0% for X3 Holdings Co. , Ltd. (XTKG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: X3 Holdings Co. , Ltd. grew EPS 92. 1% year-over-year, compared to 19. 6% for Baidu, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XTKG or BABA or JD or BIDU or AMZN?
Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -656. 6% for X3 Holdings Co. , Ltd. — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIDU leads at 16. 0% versus -718. 3% for XTKG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIDU leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XTKG or BABA or JD or BIDU or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JD. com, Inc. (JD) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 33. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BABA: 37. 8% to $194. 23.
08Which pays a better dividend — XTKG or BABA or JD or BIDU or AMZN?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. XTKG, BIDU, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XTKG or BABA or JD or BIDU or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), 2. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JD: +48. 7%, BIDU: -17. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XTKG and BABA and JD and BIDU and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (XTKG (Technology) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and JD (Consumer Cyclical) and BIDU (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XTKG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. BABA, JD pay a dividend while XTKG, BIDU, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.