Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
XYZ vs SOFI vs PYPL vs AFRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Software - Infrastructure
XYZ vs SOFI vs PYPL vs AFRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $41.77B | $20.40B | $40.77B | $22.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.48B | $4.77B | $33.17B | $3.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $806M | $481M | $5.06B | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 45.0% | 75.1% | 46.6% | 62.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 11.0% | 18.3% | 10.2% |
| Forward P/E | 19.1x | 26.5x | 8.7x | 62.5x |
| Total Debt | $8.97B | $1.82B | $9.99B | $7.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.34B | $4.93B | $8.05B | $1.35B |
XYZ vs SOFI vs PYPL vs AFRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Block, Inc. (XYZ) | 100 | 32.5 | -67.5% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 63.6 | -36.4% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 19.7 | -80.3% |
| Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XYZ vs SOFI vs PYPL vs AFRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XYZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs SOFI's 52.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.91, Low D/E 40.4%, current ratio 2.20x
- PEG 0.52 vs PYPL's 0.98
- Beta 1.91, current ratio 2.20x
SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 4.4% vs PYPL's 0.1%
PYPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 0.3%
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 62.5x)
- 15.8% margin vs XYZ's 3.3%
- Beta 1.39 vs AFRM's 2.72, lower leverage
AFRM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 109.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.7%
- 38.8% revenue growth vs XYZ's 0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.8% revenue growth vs XYZ's 0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 62.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs XYZ's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs AFRM's 2.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs PYPL's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs SOFI's 1.1%, ROIC 15.0% vs 3.6% |
XYZ vs SOFI vs PYPL vs AFRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XYZ vs SOFI vs PYPL vs AFRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PYPL leads in 4 of 6 categories
XYZ leads 0 • SOFI leads 0 • AFRM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PYPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PYPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.2B annually — 10.4x AFRM's $3.2B. PYPL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XYZ's 3.3%. On growth, XYZ holds the edge at +4.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24.5B | $4.8B | $33.2B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $760M | $6.7B | $533M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $806M | $481M | $5.1B | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.3B | -$2.6B | $5.5B | $787M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.0% | +75.1% | +46.6% | +62.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +11.0% | +18.3% | +10.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +10.1% | +15.8% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | -83.5% | +16.8% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.9% | — | — | -65.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | -56.7% | -6.2% | — |
Valuation Metrics
PYPL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, PYPL trades at a 98% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYZ offers better value at 0.91x vs PYPL's 0.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41.8B | $20.4B | $40.8B | $22.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39.4B | $17.3B | $42.7B | $28.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.39x | 41.03x | 8.54x | 449.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.10x | 26.45x | 8.71x | 62.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.91x | — | 0.97x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.66x | 22.75x | 6.08x | 209.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.73x | 4.28x | 1.23x | 6.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.97x | 1.91x | 2.21x | 7.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.23x | — | 7.33x | 37.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PYPL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PYPL delivers a 25.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $4 for XYZ. SOFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFRM's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.6% | +5.9% | +25.1% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +1.1% | +6.3% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +3.6% | +15.0% | -0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +1.2% | +18.1% | -0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.17x | 0.49x | 2.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.4B | -$3.1B | $1.9B | $6.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.3B | $4.9B | $8.0B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.0B | $1.8B | $10.0B | $7.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.93x | 0.45x | 19.28x | 1.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — XYZ and AFRM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AFRM five years ago would be worth $12,474 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,835 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, XYZ leads with a +46.2% total return vs PYPL's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFRM at 78.0% vs PYPL's -14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.6% | -41.7% | -20.3% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.2% | +23.0% | -32.3% | +30.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.3% | +192.5% | -38.4% | +464.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.0% | -3.1% | -81.6% | +24.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +611.9% | +52.7% | +17.4% | -30.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | +43.0% | -14.9% | +78.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XYZ and PYPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PYPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFRM's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XYZ currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs SOFI's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 2.54x | 1.39x | 2.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.50 | $32.73 | $79.50 | $100.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $47.11 | $12.56 | $38.46 | $42.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.0% | +48.9% | +58.1% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 41.9 | 40.9 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.9M | 65.8M | 15.4M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
PYPL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XYZ as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold", PYPL as "Hold", AFRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.6% upside for SOFI (target: $21) vs 11.8% for PYPL (target: $52). PYPL is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $83.29 | $20.89 | $51.67 | $80.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 27 | 70 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +0.3% | +14.8% | +1.1% |
PYPL leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
XYZ vs SOFI vs PYPL vs AFRM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XYZ or SOFI or PYPL or AFRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) is the stronger pick with 38. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for Block, Inc. (XYZ). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Block, Inc. (XYZ) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XYZ or SOFI or PYPL or AFRM?
On trailing P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Block, Inc. wins at 0. 52x versus PayPal Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 98x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XYZ or SOFI or PYPL or AFRM?
Over the past 5 years, Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) delivered a total return of +24. 7%, compared to -81. 6% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XYZ returned +611. 9% versus AFRM's -30. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XYZ or SOFI or PYPL or AFRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 39β versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AFRM is approximately 96% more volatile than PYPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XYZ or SOFI or PYPL or AFRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) is pulling ahead at 38. 8% versus 0. 3% for Block, Inc. (XYZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affirm Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 109. 0% year-over-year, compared to -53. 8% for Block, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AFRM leads at 33. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XYZ or SOFI or PYPL or AFRM?
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 8% net margin versus 1. 6% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PYPL leads at 18. 3% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOFI leads at 75. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XYZ or SOFI or PYPL or AFRM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Block, Inc. (XYZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 52x versus PayPal Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 98x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 53. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOFI: 30. 6% to $20. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — XYZ or SOFI or PYPL or AFRM?
In this comparison, PYPL (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. XYZ, SOFI, AFRM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XYZ or SOFI or PYPL or AFRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PYPL: +17. 4%, AFRM: -30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XYZ and SOFI and PYPL and AFRM?
These companies operate in different sectors (XYZ (Technology) and SOFI (Financial Services) and PYPL (Financial Services) and AFRM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XYZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.