Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

YAAS vs BZUN vs CANG vs JD vs BABA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
YAAS
Youxin Technology Ltd

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$419K
5Y Perf.-99.7%
BZUN
Baozun Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$165M
5Y Perf.+1.5%
CANG
Cango Inc.

Auto - Dealerships

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$250M
5Y Perf.-75.6%
JD
JD.com, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$46.46B
5Y Perf.-12.9%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$340.44B
5Y Perf.+66.3%

YAAS vs BZUN vs CANG vs JD vs BABA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
YAAS logoYAAS
BZUN logoBZUN
CANG logoCANG
JD logoJD
BABA logoBABA
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSpecialty RetailAuto - DealershipsSpecialty RetailSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$419K$165M$250M$46.46B$340.44B
Revenue (TTM)$1M$9.77B$3.46B$1.30T$1.01T
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$-204M$-178M$32.20B$123.35B
Gross Margin57.2%49.2%13.6%12.7%41.2%
Operating Margin-248.7%-0.5%7.3%1.3%10.9%
Forward P/E1.0x5.7x1.4x4.1x
Total Debt$2M$2.52B$170M$89.77B$248.49B
Cash & Equiv.$18K$1.64B$1.29B$108.35B$181.73B

YAAS vs BZUN vs CANG vs JD vs BABALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

YAAS
BZUN
CANG
JD
BABA
StockDec 24May 26Return
Youxin Technology L… (YAAS)1000.3-99.7%
Baozun Inc. (BZUN)100101.5+1.5%
Cango Inc. (CANG)10024.4-75.6%
JD.com, Inc. (JD)10087.1-12.9%
Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA)100166.3+66.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: YAAS vs BZUN vs CANG vs JD vs BABA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BABA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Baozun Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. JD also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
YAAS
Youxin Technology Ltd
The Technology Pick

YAAS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
BZUN
Baozun Inc.
The Growth Leader

BZUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.

  • 6.9% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
  • Lower P/E (1.0x vs 4.1x)
Best for: growth and value
CANG
Cango Inc.
The Value Angle

Among these 5 stocks, CANG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
JD
JD.com, Inc.
The Income Pick

JD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.6%
  • Rev growth 6.8%, EPS growth 76.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
  • Beta 1.06, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.29x
  • Beta 1.06 vs CANG's 2.25
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
The Long-Run Compounder

BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 83.4% 10Y total return vs CANG's -44.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 1.54x
  • 12.2% margin vs YAAS's -271.6%
  • +16.0% vs YAAS's -99.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBZUN logoBZUN6.9% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
ValueBZUN logoBZUNLower P/E (1.0x vs 4.1x)
Quality / MarginsBABA logoBABA12.2% margin vs YAAS's -271.6%
Stability / SafetyJD logoJDBeta 1.06 vs CANG's 2.25
DividendsJD logoJD2.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BABA's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BABA logoBABA+16.0% vs YAAS's -99.2%
Efficiency (ROA)BABA logoBABA6.7% ROA vs YAAS's -65.8%

YAAS vs BZUN vs CANG vs JD vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

YAASYouxin Technology Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

BZUNBaozun Inc.
FY 2024
Service
63.2%$6.0B
Product
36.8%$3.5B
CANGCango Inc.
FY 2024
After-market Service Facilitation Service Income
62.9%$41M
Loan Facilitation Income And Other Related Income
24.1%$16M
Automobile trading income
9.6%$6M
Service, Other
3.4%$2M
JDJD.com, Inc.
FY 2024
Electronics And Home Appliance Products
48.8%$565.0B
General Merchandise Products
31.3%$363.0B
Logistics And Other Services
12.1%$140.7B
online marketplace and marketing services
7.8%$90.1B
BABAAlibaba Group Holding Limited
FY 2025
Customer Management Services
42.6%$424.9B
Sales Of Goods
27.5%$274.3B
Logistics Services
12.4%$123.4B
Cloud Services
8.5%$84.5B
Membership Fees and Value Added Services
4.7%$46.6B
Product and Service, Other
4.3%$42.7B

YAAS vs BZUN vs CANG vs JD vs BABA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBABALAGGINGCANG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 961355.9x YAAS's $1M. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YAAS's -2.7%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricYAAS logoYAASYouxin Technology…BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.JD logoJDJD.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$9.8B$3.5B$1.30T$1.01T
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M-$4M$333M$23.8B$114.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M-$204M-$178M$32.2B$123.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M$0$0$9.1B$2.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.2%+49.2%+13.6%+12.7%+41.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.5%-0.5%+7.3%+1.3%+10.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.7%-2.1%-5.2%+2.5%+12.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.8%-1.1%-154.0%+0.7%+0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.2%+4.8%+58.3%+14.9%+4.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+97.8%-29.2%+3.6%-56.3%-52.0%
Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BZUN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 68% valuation discount to BABA's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BZUN's 15.4x.

MetricYAAS logoYAASYouxin Technology…BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.JD logoJDJD.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Market CapShares × price$419,114$165M$250M$46.5B$340.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2M$294M$85M$43.7B$350.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.33x-6.08x5.66x7.64x17.90x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.95x1.43x4.13x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.29x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.40x3.13x6.40x13.55x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.80x0.12x2.12x0.27x2.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.19x0.42x1.01x2.12x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.14x29.64x
BZUN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BABA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

BABA delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-109 for YAAS. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BZUN's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs YAAS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricYAAS logoYAASYouxin Technology…BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.JD logoJDJD.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-109.2%-3.7%-4.1%+10.5%+11.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-65.8%-2.1%-2.3%+4.6%+6.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.3%+4.6%+9.9%+9.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.7%+4.5%+10.2%+10.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.44x0.04x0.29x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1M$879M-$1.1B-$18.6B$66.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$18,372$1.6B$1.3B$108.3B$181.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$2.5B$170M$89.8B$248.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.78x-1.87x12.85x15.74x
BABA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BABA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $34 for YAAS. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +16.0% total return vs YAAS's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.5% vs YAAS's -85.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricYAAS logoYAASYouxin Technology…BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.JD logoJDJD.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-34.4%-1.8%-62.0%+5.7%-9.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.2%-15.9%-73.7%-7.7%+16.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%-40.4%+1.2%-8.2%+74.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%-91.6%-14.2%-53.8%-35.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%-49.3%-44.9%+48.7%+83.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-85.0%-15.8%+0.4%-2.8%+20.5%
BABA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

JD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

JD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JD currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs YAAS's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricYAAS logoYAASYouxin Technology…BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.JD logoJDJD.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.60x1.48x2.25x1.06x1.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$560.00$4.88$2.88$38.08$192.67
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.75$2.07$0.33$24.51$103.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.2%+56.6%+18.6%+79.3%+73.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.753.858.658.061.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.6M376K1.3M10.1M10.4M
JD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CANG and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BZUN as "Buy", CANG as "Buy", JD as "Buy", BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 8.8% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs BABA's 1.27%.

MetricYAAS logoYAASYouxin Technology…BZUN logoBZUNBaozun Inc.CANG logoCANGCango Inc.JD logoJDJD.com, Inc.BABA logoBABAAlibaba Group Hol…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.35$3.00$32.86$194.23
# AnalystsCovering analysts1324559
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+2.6%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0512
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02$5.37$12.14
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+8.5%+5.3%+8.2%+3.8%
Evenly matched — CANG and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BZUN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallAlibaba Group Holding Limit… (BABA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

YAAS vs BZUN vs CANG vs JD vs BABA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is YAAS or BZUN or CANG or JD or BABA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Baozun Inc.

(BZUN) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baozun Inc. (BZUN) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — YAAS or BZUN or CANG or JD or BABA?

On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 17. 9x. On forward P/E, Baozun Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — YAAS or BZUN or CANG or JD or BABA?

Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.

(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -99. 7% for Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +83. 4% versus YAAS's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — YAAS or BZUN or CANG or JD or BABA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JD.

com, Inc. (JD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 112% more volatile than JD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 44% for Baozun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — YAAS or BZUN or CANG or JD or BABA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Baozun Inc.

(BZUN) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to 34. 0% for Baozun Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JD leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — YAAS or BZUN or CANG or JD or BABA?

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -245. 7% for Youxin Technology Ltd — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -266. 4% for YAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YAAS leads at 65. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is YAAS or BZUN or CANG or JD or BABA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Baozun Inc.

(BZUN) trades at 1. 0x forward P/E versus 4. 1x for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — YAAS or BZUN or CANG or JD or BABA?

In this comparison, JD (2.

6% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. YAAS, BZUN, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is YAAS or BZUN or CANG or JD or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JD.

com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), 2. 6% yield). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JD: +48. 7%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between YAAS and BZUN and CANG and JD and BABA?

These companies operate in different sectors (YAAS (Technology) and BZUN (Consumer Cyclical) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and JD (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: YAAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BZUN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock. JD, BABA pay a dividend while YAAS, BZUN, CANG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

YAAS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BZUN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 29%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CANG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 2916%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BABA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform YAAS and BZUN and CANG and JD and BABA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(YAAS: 21.2% · BZUN: 4.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.