Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ZDGE vs PINS vs SNAP vs APPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
ZDGE vs PINS vs SNAP vs APPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $41M | $14.34B | $10.11B | $477M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $31M | $4.37B | $6.10B | $532M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $334M | $-410M | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 92.0% | 79.9% | 55.8% | 60.1% |
| Operating Margin | -4.4% | 6.3% | -6.8% | 0.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.8x | — | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $197K | $262M | $4.70B | $418M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $969M | $1.03B | $40M |
ZDGE vs PINS vs SNAP vs APPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zedge, Inc. (ZDGE) | 100 | 289.2 | +189.2% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 106.3 | +6.3% |
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | 100 | 31.6 | -68.4% |
| Digital Turbine, In… (APPS) | 100 | 62.1 | -37.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZDGE vs PINS vs SNAP vs APPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZDGE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +41.8% vs SNAP's -26.4%
PINS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.27
- Rev growth 15.8%, EPS growth -77.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- -11.6% 10Y total return vs APPS's 353.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 5.5%, current ratio 7.64x
SNAP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
APPS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.8% revenue growth vs APPS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.6% margin vs APPS's -7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs SNAP's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.8% vs SNAP's -26.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs SNAP's -5.4%, ROIC 6.1% vs -6.9% |
ZDGE vs PINS vs SNAP vs APPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZDGE vs PINS vs SNAP vs APPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PINS leads in 2 of 6 categories
APPS leads 1 • ZDGE leads 1 • SNAP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PINS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNAP is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 196.1x ZDGE's $31M. PINS is the more profitable business, keeping 7.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to APPS's -7.9%. On growth, ZDGE holds the edge at +18.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $31M | $4.4B | $6.1B | $532M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$526,000 | $294M | -$291M | $70M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $334M | -$410M | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $1.2B | $609M | $19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.0% | +79.9% | +55.8% | +60.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +6.3% | -6.8% | +0.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +7.6% | -6.7% | -7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +27.6% | +10.0% | +3.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.3% | +17.8% | +12.1% | +12.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | -10.3% | +39.2% | +113.6% |
Valuation Metrics
APPS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, APPS's 29.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ZDGE's 60.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $14.3B | $10.1B | $477M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22M | $13.6B | $13.8B | $855M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.88x | 35.37x | -22.17x | -4.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.84x | — | 10.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 60.35x | 39.51x | — | 29.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.39x | 3.40x | 1.70x | 0.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.70x | 3.13x | 4.51x | 2.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.20x | 11.46x | 23.12x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PINS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PINS delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-22 for APPS. ZDGE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to APPS's 2.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZDGE scores 6/9 vs APPS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.2% | +7.8% | -18.9% | -21.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.2% | +6.3% | -5.4% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | +6.1% | -6.9% | -7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | +6.4% | -8.1% | -8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.06x | 2.06x | 2.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$18M | -$707M | $3.7B | $378M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $969M | $1.0B | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $197,000 | $262M | $4.7B | $418M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 23.20x | -7.67x | -1.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZDGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PINS five years ago would be worth $3,604 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $613 for APPS. Over the past 12 months, ZDGE leads with a +41.8% total return vs SNAP's -26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZDGE at 19.5% vs APPS's -30.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.7% | -18.8% | -26.4% | -16.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.8% | -21.1% | -26.4% | +10.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.8% | -0.1% | -28.9% | -66.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.7% | -64.0% | -89.1% | -93.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | -11.6% | -75.6% | +353.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.5% | -0.0% | -10.8% | -30.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZDGE and PINS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PINS is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNAP's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZDGE currently trades 65.6% from its 52-week high vs APPS's 48.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.27x | 2.14x | 1.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.89 | $39.93 | $10.41 | $8.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.12 | $13.84 | $3.81 | $2.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.6% | +54.0% | +57.5% | +48.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 60.2 | 61.6 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 69K | 16.1M | 49.1M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PINS as "Buy", SNAP as "Hold", APPS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 150.6% upside for APPS (target: $10) vs 17.5% for PINS (target: $25).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.36 | $7.89 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 47 | 72 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.9% | +6.5% | +27.2% | 0.0% |
PINS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). APPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ZDGE vs PINS vs SNAP vs APPS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZDGE or PINS or SNAP or APPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the stronger pick with 15. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS). Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) offers the better valuation at 35. 4x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZDGE or PINS or SNAP or APPS?
On forward P/E, Digital Turbine, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZDGE or PINS or SNAP or APPS?
Over the past 5 years, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) delivered a total return of -64. 0%, compared to -93. 9% for Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPS returned +353. 4% versus SNAP's -75. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZDGE or PINS or SNAP or APPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Snap Inc. 's 2. 14β — meaning SNAP is approximately 69% more volatile than PINS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zedge, Inc. (ZDGE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Digital Turbine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZDGE or PINS or SNAP or APPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is pulling ahead at 15. 8% versus -9. 9% for Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Digital Turbine, Inc. grew EPS 78. 6% year-over-year, compared to -77. 2% for Pinterest, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PINS leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZDGE or PINS or SNAP or APPS?
Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus -18. 8% for Digital Turbine, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PINS leads at 7. 6% versus -11. 0% for APPS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZDGE leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZDGE or PINS or SNAP or APPS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Digital Turbine, Inc.
(APPS) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Pinterest, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APPS: 150. 6% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZDGE or PINS or SNAP or APPS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ZDGE or PINS or SNAP or APPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pinterest, Inc.
(PINS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27)). Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a higher beta of 2. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PINS: -11. 6%, SNAP: -75. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZDGE and PINS and SNAP and APPS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZDGE (Communication Services) and PINS (Communication Services) and SNAP (Unknown) and APPS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZDGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PINS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SNAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; APPS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 55%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.