ZSPC
zSpace, Inc.
Computer Hardware
Market Cap$140K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ZSPC vs VRAR vs IMMR vs KOPN vs MVIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
VRAR
The Glimpse Group, Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$11M
5Y Perf.-78.4%
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
Software - Application
Market Cap$211M
5Y Perf.-25.7%
KOPN
Kopin Corporation
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$755M
5Y Perf.+254.4%
MVIS
MicroVision, Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$189M
5Y Perf.-53.0%
ZSPC vs VRAR vs IMMR vs KOPN vs MVIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ZSPC | VRAR | IMMR | KOPN | MVIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $140K | $11M | $211M | $755M | $189M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $9M | $1.47B | $46M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $-1.03T | $66M | $-6M | $-95M |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 106213.6% | 27.8% | 26.1% | -14.4% |
| Operating Margin | -79.5% | -133740.0% | 9.1% | -26.6% | -57.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 15.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $18M | $132K | $322M | $2M | $37M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $7M | $78M | $14M | $32M |
ZSPC vs VRAR vs IMMR vs KOPN vs MVIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ZSPC
VRAR
IMMR
KOPN
MVIS
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| zSpace, Inc. (ZSPC) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| The Glimpse Group, … (VRAR) | 100 | 21.6 | -78.4% |
| Immersion Corporati… (IMMR) | 100 | 74.3 | -25.7% |
| Kopin Corporation (KOPN) | 100 | 354.4 | +254.4% |
| MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS) | 100 | 47.0 | -53.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZSPC vs VRAR vs IMMR vs KOPN vs MVIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: IMMR leads in 5 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Kopin Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZSPC
zSpace, Inc.
The Technology Pick
ZSPC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: technology exposure
VRAR
The Glimpse Group, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
VRAR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.23, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 3.49x
- Beta 2.23, current ratio 3.49x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
The Income Pick
IMMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 6.0%
- Rev growth 35.4%, EPS growth 295.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 227.7%
- 35.4% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3%
- 4.5% margin vs VRAR's -109K%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KOPN
Kopin Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder
KOPN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 183.5% 10Y total return vs IMMR's 13.3%
- +265.2% vs ZSPC's -99.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
MVIS
MicroVision, Inc.
The Technology Pick
Among these 5 stocks, MVIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | IMMR | 35.4% revenue growth vs MVIS's -74.3% |
| Quality / Margins | IMMR | 4.5% margin vs VRAR's -109K% |
| Stability / Safety | IMMR | Beta 1.52 vs KOPN's 3.50 |
| Dividends | IMMR | 6.0% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | KOPN | +265.2% vs ZSPC's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | IMMR | 5.3% ROA vs ZSPC's -236.0% |
ZSPC vs VRAR vs IMMR vs KOPN vs MVIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2023
FY 2024
FY 2025
ZSPC vs VRAR vs IMMR vs KOPN vs MVIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLIMMRLAGGINGMVIS
Who Leads Where
IMMR leads in 3 of 6 categories
KOPN leads 1 • ZSPC leads 0 • VRAR leads 0 • MVIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓MVISMicroVision, Inc.
0leads
VRARThe Glimpse Group, In…
0leads
ZSPCzSpace, Inc.
0leads
KOPNKopin Corporation
1leads
IMMRImmersion Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KOPNvs ZSPCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
IMMR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
IMMR5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KOPN5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
IMMR1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 1218.4x MVIS's $1M. IMMR is the more profitable business, keeping 4.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VRAR's -108904.7%. On growth, IMMR holds the edge at +5.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ZSPCzSpace, Inc. | VRARThe Glimpse Group… | IMMRImmersion Corpora… | KOPNKopin Corporation | MVISMicroVision, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $9M | $1.5B | $46M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$1.20T | $166M | -$11M | -$64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | -$1.03T | $66M | -$6M | -$95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$18M | -$1M | -$69M | -$11M | -$59M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +106213.6% | +27.8% | +26.1% | -14.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -79.5% | -133740.0% | +9.1% | -26.6% | -57.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -91.1% | -108904.7% | +4.5% | -13.5% | -78.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.6% | -12.4% | -4.7% | -24.3% | -49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.2% | -42.6% | +5.4% | -10.2% | -86.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.4% | -817923.7% | -137.3% | +186.7% | +14.3% |
IMMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ZSPC and IMMR and KOPN each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ZSPCzSpace, Inc. | VRARThe Glimpse Group… | IMMRImmersion Corpora… | KOPNKopin Corporation | MVISMicroVision, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $140,422 | $11M | $211M | $755M | $189M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17M | $4M | $455M | $743M | $193M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -3.88x | 1.58x | -14.61x | -1.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.49x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2.95x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 1.01x | 0.17x | 15.00x | 156.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.58x | 0.38x | 27.51x | 3.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Evenly matched — ZSPC and IMMR and KOPN each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMMR delivers a 13.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-137 for MVIS. VRAR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVIS's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VRAR scores 5/9 vs KOPN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ZSPCzSpace, Inc. | VRARThe Glimpse Group… | IMMRImmersion Corpora… | KOPNKopin Corporation | MVISMicroVision, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.4% | +13.0% | -30.2% | -137.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.4% | -5.6% | +5.3% | -9.5% | -74.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -20.1% | +21.2% | -172.3% | -98.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -18.2% | +25.8% | -143.1% | -93.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.57x | 0.09x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | -$7M | $244M | -$12M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $7M | $78M | $14M | $32M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $131,750 | $322M | $2M | $37M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.30x | — | 12.24x | — | -3.54x |
IMMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KOPN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMMR five years ago would be worth $9,392 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for ZSPC. Over the past 12 months, KOPN leads with a +265.2% total return vs ZSPC's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KOPN at 69.2% vs ZSPC's -93.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ZSPCzSpace, Inc. | VRARThe Glimpse Group… | IMMRImmersion Corpora… | KOPNKopin Corporation | MVISMicroVision, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.9% | -46.9% | +3.6% | +93.6% | -30.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -54.6% | -6.1% | +265.2% | -45.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -87.2% | +3.4% | +384.4% | -73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -97.1% | -6.1% | -37.1% | -95.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -97.1% | +13.3% | +183.5% | -66.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.7% | -49.7% | +1.1% | +69.2% | -35.8% |
KOPN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMMR and KOPN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMMR is the less volatile stock with a 1.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KOPN's 3.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KOPN currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs ZSPC's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ZSPCzSpace, Inc. | VRARThe Glimpse Group… | IMMRImmersion Corpora… | KOPNKopin Corporation | MVISMicroVision, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.50x | 2.23x | 1.52x | 3.50x | 2.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $206.00 | $1.85 | $8.15 | $5.04 | $1.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.09 | $0.45 | $5.25 | $1.23 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +27.2% | +79.6% | +95.6% | +35.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 22.1 | 43.5 | 61.0 | 82.3 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 40K | 518K | 5.4M | 5.3M |
Evenly matched — IMMR and KOPN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
IMMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMMR as "Buy", KOPN as "Buy", MVIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 711.7% upside for MVIS (target: $5) vs 3.7% for KOPN (target: $5). IMMR is the only dividend payer here at 5.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ZSPCzSpace, Inc. | VRARThe Glimpse Group… | IMMRImmersion Corpora… | KOPNKopin Corporation | MVISMicroVision, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $10.00 | $5.00 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 15 | 7 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.39 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
IMMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
IMMR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KOPN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallImmersion Corporation (IMMR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ZSPC vs VRAR vs IMMR vs KOPN vs MVIS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZSPC or VRAR or IMMR or KOPN or MVIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the stronger pick with 35.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immersion Corporation (IMMR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZSPC or VRAR or IMMR or KOPN or MVIS?
Over the past 5 years, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) delivered a total return of -6.
1%, compared to -100. 0% for zSpace, Inc. (ZSPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KOPN returned +183. 5% versus ZSPC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZSPC or VRAR or IMMR or KOPN or MVIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
52β versus Kopin Corporation's 3. 50β — meaning KOPN is approximately 131% more volatile than IMMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Glimpse Group, Inc. (VRAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 66% for MicroVision, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ZSPC or VRAR or IMMR or KOPN or MVIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is pulling ahead at 35.
4% versus -74. 3% for MicroVision, Inc. (MVIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immersion Corporation grew EPS 295. 2% year-over-year, compared to -198. 1% for zSpace, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMMR leads at 227. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZSPC or VRAR or IMMR or KOPN or MVIS?
Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
3% net margin versus -78. 6% for MicroVision, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMMR leads at 10. 7% versus -57. 4% for MVIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRAR leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ZSPC or VRAR or IMMR or KOPN or MVIS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVIS: 711.
7% to $5. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ZSPC or VRAR or IMMR or KOPN or MVIS?
In this comparison, IMMR (6.
0% yield) pays a dividend. ZSPC, VRAR, KOPN, MVIS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ZSPC or VRAR or IMMR or KOPN or MVIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6.
0% yield). zSpace, Inc. (ZSPC) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMMR: +13. 3%, ZSPC: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ZSPC and VRAR and IMMR and KOPN and MVIS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZSPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VRAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; KOPN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MVIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IMMR pays a dividend while ZSPC, VRAR, KOPN, MVIS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ZSPC: -43.2% · VRAR: -42.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.