Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $650M | $8.75B | $2.57B | $398M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $122M | $417M | $669M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $124M | $225M | $-609M | $-223M |
| Gross Margin | 85.8% | 92.8% | 83.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.4% | 42.8% | -83.9% | — |
| Forward P/E | 22.6x | 39.3x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $63M | $9M | $1.28B | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $62M | $496M | $434M | $78M |
ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zevra Therapeutics,… (ZVRA) | 100 | 365.7 | +265.7% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 577.1 | +477.1% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 19.5 | -80.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZVRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.63
- Rev growth 350.9%, EPS growth 159.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 118.8%
- 350.9% revenue growth vs RCKT's 10.5%
- Better valuation composite
KRYS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 26.9% 10Y total return vs RARE's -59.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 9.95x
- +116.9% vs RCKT's -45.2%
RARE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
RCKT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 350.9% revenue growth vs RCKT's 10.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 101.6% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs RARE's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +116.9% vs RCKT's -45.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 45.6% ROA vs RCKT's -67.5%, ROIC -2.9% vs -63.2% |
ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories
RARE leads 1 • ZVRA leads 0 • RCKT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ZVRA and KRYS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue. ZVRA is the more profitable business, keeping 101.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, ZVRA holds the edge at +77.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $122M | $417M | $669M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $185M | -$536M | -$232M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $124M | $225M | -$609M | -$223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $237M | -$487M | -$190M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.8% | +92.8% | +83.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +42.8% | -83.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +101.6% | +53.9% | -91.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +56.9% | -72.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.5% | +31.9% | -2.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +52.5% | -17.2% | +38.7% |
Valuation Metrics
RARE leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, ZVRA trades at a 81% valuation discount to KRYS's 43.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $650M | $8.7B | $2.6B | $398M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $651M | $8.3B | $3.4B | $345M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.15x | 43.38x | -4.48x | -1.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.60x | 39.33x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 49.21x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.11x | 22.48x | 3.82x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.07x | 7.29x | — | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 46.30x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZVRA delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZVRA's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZVRA scores 6/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +81.3% | +19.3% | -6.1% | -80.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +45.6% | +17.6% | -45.8% | -67.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.9% | +18.0% | -89.4% | -63.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.2% | +14.8% | -46.4% | -58.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.01x | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $800,000 | -$487M | $842M | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $62M | $496M | $434M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $63M | $9M | $1.3B | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.02x | — | -14.49x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $41,919 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, KRYS leads with a +116.9% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 50.1% vs RCKT's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.9% | +20.2% | +10.7% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.5% | +116.9% | -21.8% | -45.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +123.6% | +238.5% | -44.5% | -82.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.8% | +319.2% | -77.2% | -91.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.9% | +2688.5% | -59.4% | -91.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.8% | +50.1% | -17.8% | -44.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZVRA and KRYS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZVRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRYS currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.12x | 1.42x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.16 | $303.00 | $42.37 | $7.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.16 | $122.80 | $18.29 | $2.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.6% | +97.9% | +61.7% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 64.3 | 66.6 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 264K | 1.8M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZVRA as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 120.5% upside for ZVRA (target: $24) vs 12.2% for KRYS (target: $333).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.25 | $332.75 | $51.50 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 17 | 33 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KRYS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RARE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is the stronger pick with 350. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. (ZVRA) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. (ZVRA) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT?
On trailing P/E, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) delivered a total return of +319. 2%, compared to -91. 6% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +26. 9% versus RCKT's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 123% more volatile than ZVRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 41% for Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is pulling ahead at 350. 9% versus 20. 1% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 159. 2% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZVRA leads at 118. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT?
Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is the more profitable company, earning 78. 2% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 78. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) trades at 22. 6x forward P/E versus 39. 3x for Krystal Biotech, Inc. — 16. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZVRA: 120. 5% to $24. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ZVRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZVRA: -90. 9%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZVRA and KRYS and RARE and RCKT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZVRA is a small-cap high-growth stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.