Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs FOLD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$650M
5Y Perf.+265.7%
KRYS
Krystal Biotech, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.75B
5Y Perf.+477.1%
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.57B
5Y Perf.-61.8%
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$398M
5Y Perf.-80.5%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+15.9%

ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs FOLD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZVRA logoZVRA
KRYS logoKRYS
RARE logoRARE
RCKT logoRCKT
FOLD logoFOLD
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$650M$8.75B$2.57B$398M$4.55B
Revenue (TTM)$122M$417M$669M$0.00$634M
Net Income (TTM)$124M$225M$-609M$-223M$-27M
Gross Margin85.8%92.8%83.6%87.9%
Operating Margin-4.4%42.8%-83.9%5.2%
Forward P/E22.6x39.3x40.6x
Total Debt$63M$9M$1.28B$25M$483M
Cash & Equiv.$62M$496M$434M$78M$214M

ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs FOLDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZVRA
KRYS
RARE
RCKT
FOLD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Zevra Therapeutics,… (ZVRA)100365.7+265.7%
Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS)100577.1+477.1%
Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE)10038.2-61.8%
Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT)10019.5-80.5%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)100115.9+15.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs FOLD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ZVRA leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZVRA
Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

ZVRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 350.9%, EPS growth 159.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 118.8%
  • 350.9% revenue growth vs RCKT's 10.5%
  • Lower P/E (22.6x vs 40.6x)
  • 101.6% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Best for: growth exposure
KRYS
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

KRYS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 26.9% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 119.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
  • Beta 1.12, current ratio 9.95x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
RARE
Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
The Growth Angle

RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, RCKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • beta 0.63
  • Beta 0.63 vs RARE's 1.42
  • +137.9% vs RCKT's -45.2%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthZVRA logoZVRA350.9% revenue growth vs RCKT's 10.5%
ValueZVRA logoZVRALower P/E (22.6x vs 40.6x)
Quality / MarginsZVRA logoZVRA101.6% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.63 vs RARE's 1.42
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FOLD logoFOLD+137.9% vs RCKT's -45.2%
Efficiency (ROA)ZVRA logoZVRA45.6% ROA vs RCKT's -67.5%, ROIC -2.9% vs -63.2%

ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZVRAZevra Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2023
License
100.0%$18M
KRYSKrystal Biotech, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RAREUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.
FY 2025
Product
54.8%$369M
Royalty
45.2%$304M
RCKTRocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs FOLD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKRYSLAGGINGRCKT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ZVRA and KRYS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

RARE and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and $0 in trailing revenue. ZVRA is the more profitable business, keeping 101.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, ZVRA holds the edge at +77.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZVRA logoZVRAZevra Therapeutic…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$122M$417M$669M$0$634M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M$185M-$536M-$232M$40M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$124M$225M-$609M-$223M-$27M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$12M$237M-$487M-$190M$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+85.8%+92.8%+83.6%+87.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.4%+42.8%-83.9%+5.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+101.6%+53.9%-91.0%-4.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.8%+56.9%-72.8%+4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+77.5%+31.9%-2.4%+23.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.5%+52.5%-17.2%+38.7%-89.0%
Evenly matched — ZVRA and KRYS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KRYS leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.1x trailing earnings, ZVRA trades at a 81% valuation discount to KRYS's 43.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KRYS's 49.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricZVRA logoZVRAZevra Therapeutic…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$650M$8.7B$2.6B$398M$4.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$651M$8.3B$3.4B$345M$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.15x43.38x-4.48x-1.83x-164.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.60x39.33x40.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple49.21x114.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.11x22.48x3.82x7.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.07x7.29x1.47x16.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF46.30x152.43x
KRYS leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

ZVRA delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. KRYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZVRA scores 6/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricZVRA logoZVRAZevra Therapeutic…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+81.3%+19.3%-6.1%-80.5%-12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+45.6%+17.6%-45.8%-67.5%-3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.9%+18.0%-89.4%-63.2%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.2%+14.8%-46.4%-58.9%+5.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965414
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.41x0.01x0.09x1.76x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$800,000-$487M$842M-$53M$269M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$62M$496M$434M$78M$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$63M$9M$1.3B$25M$483M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense22.02x-14.49x1.00x
KRYS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $41,919 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +137.9% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRYS at 50.1% vs RCKT's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZVRA logoZVRAZevra Therapeutic…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+31.9%+20.2%+10.7%+6.1%+1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+46.5%+116.9%-21.8%-45.2%+137.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.6%+238.5%-44.5%-82.8%+19.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.8%+319.2%-77.2%-91.6%+48.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-90.9%+2688.5%-59.4%-91.3%+119.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.8%+50.1%-17.8%-44.4%+6.0%
KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZVRA logoZVRAZevra Therapeutic…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.63x1.12x1.42x1.31x0.63x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.16$303.00$42.37$7.39$14.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.16$122.80$18.29$2.19$5.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.6%+97.9%+61.7%+49.7%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.764.366.654.472.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M264K1.8M3.5M3.0M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ZVRA as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 120.5% upside for ZVRA (target: $24) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricZVRA logoZVRAZevra Therapeutic…KRYS logoKRYSKrystal Biotech, …RARE logoRAREUltragenyx Pharma…RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.25$332.75$51.50$5.00$14.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts817331924
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

KRYS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FOLD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallKrystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZVRA vs KRYS vs RARE vs RCKT vs FOLD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or FOLD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.

(ZVRA) is the stronger pick with 350. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 0% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. (ZVRA) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. (ZVRA) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or FOLD?

On trailing P/E, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.

(ZVRA) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Krystal Biotech, Inc. at 43. 4x. On forward P/E, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or FOLD?

Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.

(KRYS) delivered a total return of +319. 2%, compared to -91. 6% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +26. 9% versus RCKT's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or FOLD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning RARE is approximately 125% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or FOLD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.

(ZVRA) is pulling ahead at 350. 9% versus 20. 0% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zevra Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 159. 2% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZVRA leads at 118. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or FOLD?

Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.

(ZVRA) is the more profitable company, earning 78. 2% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 78. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or FOLD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Zevra Therapeutics, Inc.

(ZVRA) trades at 22. 6x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZVRA: 120. 5% to $24. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or FOLD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is ZVRA or KRYS or RARE or RCKT or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ZVRA and KRYS and RARE and RCKT and FOLD?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ZVRA is a small-cap high-growth stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ZVRA

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 38%
  • Net Margin > 60%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KRYS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RARE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCKT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ZVRA and KRYS and RARE and RCKT and FOLD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ZVRA: 77.5% · KRYS: 31.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(ZVRA: 101.6% · KRYS: 53.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ZVRA: 8.1x · KRYS: 43.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.