Medical - Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZYXI vs ENVA vs WRLD vs STIM vs RM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Financial - Credit Services
ZYXI vs ENVA vs WRLD vs STIM vs RM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Distribution | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $4.36B | $754M | $115M | $332M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $108M | $3.15B | $565M | $152M | $646M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-74M | $327M | $43M | $-37M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 71.6% | 50.1% | 70.0% | 48.0% | 52.3% |
| Operating Margin | -62.8% | 23.5% | 28.1% | -19.4% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.6x | 10.6x | 21.2x | — | 6.4x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $4.56B | $526M | $90M | $1.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $40M | $72M | $10M | $34M | $98M |
ZYXI vs ENVA vs WRLD vs STIM vs RM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zynex, Inc. (ZYXI) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 1167.3 | +1067.3% |
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 182.3 | +82.3% |
| Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM) | 100 | 114.2 | +14.2% |
| Regional Management… (RM) | 100 | 233.6 | +133.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZYXI vs ENVA vs WRLD vs STIM vs RM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZYXI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
ENVA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 20.6% 10Y total return vs WRLD's 266.6%
- +84.1% vs ZYXI's -97.4%
- 5.2% ROA vs ZYXI's -82.4%, ROIC 10.4% vs 6.1%
WRLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and bank quality is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, current ratio 12.55x
- NIM 41.9% vs RM's 22.6%
- 15.9% margin vs ZYXI's -68.4%
- Beta 1.31 vs ZYXI's 4.40, lower leverage
STIM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 99.2%, EPS growth 57.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.8%
- 99.2% revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5%
RM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 3.3%
- PEG 0.48 vs WRLD's 0.59
- Beta 1.45, yield 3.3%, current ratio 8.39x
- 3.3% yield, vs ZYXI's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 99.2% revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs ZYXI's -68.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs ZYXI's 4.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, vs ZYXI's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +84.1% vs ZYXI's -97.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs ZYXI's -82.4%, ROIC 10.4% vs 6.1% |
ZYXI vs ENVA vs WRLD vs STIM vs RM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ZYXI vs ENVA vs WRLD vs STIM vs RM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WRLD leads in 2 of 6 categories
ZYXI leads 1 • ENVA leads 1 • STIM leads 0 • RM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WRLD leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 29.1x ZYXI's $108M. WRLD is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZYXI's -68.4%. On growth, STIM holds the edge at +7.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $108M | $3.2B | $565M | $152M | $646M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$64M | $815M | $61M | -$27M | $117M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$74M | $327M | $43M | -$37M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$21M | $1.9B | $252M | -$4M | $316M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.6% | +50.1% | +70.0% | +48.0% | +52.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -62.8% | +23.5% | +28.1% | -19.4% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -68.4% | +9.8% | +15.9% | -24.5% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.4% | +56.2% | +44.3% | -2.6% | +47.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -73.3% | — | — | +7.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.1% | +28.6% | -107.8% | +23.8% | +68.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ZYXI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.6x trailing earnings, ZYXI trades at a 96% valuation discount to ENVA's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WRLD offers better value at 0.26x vs RM's 0.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $4.4B | $754M | $115M | $332M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $36M | $8.9B | $1.3B | $171M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.61x | 15.10x | 9.18x | -2.81x | 7.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.64x | 21.17x | — | 6.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.26x | — | 0.60x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.33x | 11.33x | 7.53x | — | 21.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 1.38x | 1.34x | 0.77x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 3.45x | 1.88x | 4.16x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.14x | 2.46x | 3.01x | — | 1.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVA delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-18 for ZYXI. WRLD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RM's 4.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs STIM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.1% | +24.9% | +10.8% | -139.8% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -82.4% | +5.2% | +4.0% | -27.1% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +10.4% | +12.1% | -26.6% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +13.5% | +16.3% | -28.5% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.07x | 3.41x | 1.20x | 3.44x | 4.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $34M | $4.5B | $516M | $56M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $40M | $72M | $10M | $34M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $4.6B | $526M | $90M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.32x | 79.01x | 1.13x | -2.43x | 1.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $47,424 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $114 for ZYXI. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +84.1% total return vs ZYXI's -97.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 59.7% vs ZYXI's -82.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.1% | +8.0% | +5.6% | +14.9% | -9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.4% | +84.1% | +9.1% | -64.4% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +307.6% | +33.0% | -24.8% | +45.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | +374.2% | +7.4% | -87.3% | -7.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.4% | +2064.6% | +266.6% | -94.0% | +161.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -82.1% | +59.7% | +10.0% | -9.1% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ENVA and WRLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WRLD is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZYXI's 4.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENVA currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs ZYXI's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.40x | 1.48x | 1.31x | 1.77x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.82 | $176.68 | $185.48 | $4.85 | $46.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.02 | $89.00 | $110.00 | $0.80 | $26.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.0% | +99.0% | +80.7% | +34.1% | +76.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.5 | 65.3 | 54.2 | 56.3 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 108K | 224K | 161K | 2.0M | 56K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ZYXI and ENVA and RM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ENVA as "Buy", WRLD as "Hold", STIM as "Buy", RM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 383.4% upside for STIM (target: $8) vs 14.1% for ENVA (target: $200). For income investors, RM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.27% vs ZYXI's 0.51%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $199.50 | — | $8.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 10 | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — | — | — | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — | — | — | $1.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | +4.9% | +7.2% | 0.0% | +7.2% |
WRLD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZYXI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ZYXI vs ENVA vs WRLD vs STIM vs RM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZYXI or ENVA or WRLD or STIM or RM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Neuronetics, Inc.
(STIM) is the stronger pick with 99. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). Zynex, Inc. (ZYXI) offers the better valuation at 0. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZYXI or ENVA or WRLD or STIM or RM?
On trailing P/E, Zynex, Inc.
(ZYXI) is the cheapest at 0. 6x versus Enova International, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, Regional Management Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regional Management Corp. wins at 0. 48x versus World Acceptance Corporation's 0. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZYXI or ENVA or WRLD or STIM or RM?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +374. 2%, compared to -98. 9% for Zynex, Inc. (ZYXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 6% versus STIM's -94. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZYXI or ENVA or WRLD or STIM or RM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
31β versus Zynex, Inc. 's 4. 40β — meaning ZYXI is approximately 236% more volatile than WRLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 120% versus 5% for Regional Management Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZYXI or ENVA or WRLD or STIM or RM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Neuronetics, Inc.
(STIM) is pulling ahead at 99. 2% versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Neuronetics, Inc. grew EPS 57. 2% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for Zynex, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STIM leads at 31. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZYXI or ENVA or WRLD or STIM or RM?
World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus -26. 1% for Neuronetics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WRLD leads at 28. 1% versus -21. 1% for STIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZYXI leads at 79. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZYXI or ENVA or WRLD or STIM or RM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regional Management Corp. (RM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 48x versus World Acceptance Corporation's 0. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Regional Management Corp. (RM) trades at 6. 4x forward P/E versus 21. 2x for World Acceptance Corporation — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STIM: 383. 4% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZYXI or ENVA or WRLD or STIM or RM?
In this comparison, RM (3.
3% yield), ZYXI (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. ENVA, WRLD, STIM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZYXI or ENVA or WRLD or STIM or RM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regional Management Corp.
(RM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 3% yield, +161. 6% 10Y return). Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RM: +161. 6%, STIM: -94. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZYXI and ENVA and WRLD and STIM and RM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZYXI (Healthcare) and ENVA (Financial Services) and WRLD (Financial Services) and STIM (Healthcare) and RM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZYXI is a small-cap deep-value stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; STIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; RM is a small-cap deep-value stock. ZYXI, RM pay a dividend while ENVA, WRLD, STIM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.