Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EFSI vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
EFSI vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $233M | $207M | $272M | $184M | $446M | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $105M | $90M | $120M | $135M | $137M | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $14M | $25M | $16M | $43M | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 61.6% | 54.7% | 70.3% | 54.3% | 69.7% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 7.0% | 27.2% | 14.1% | 41.4% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 11.8x | 9.7x | 11.0x | 10.5x | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $52M | $115M | $70M | $0.00 | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $119M | $132M | $26M | $245M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
EFSI vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Financial Ser… (EFSI) | 100 | 167.8 | +67.8% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 428.0 | +328.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFSI vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EFSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.6%
- 2.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
CZWI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
- +52.1% vs KO's +17.2%
FUNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 19.7%
- 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.26
MNSB doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
BSVN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.61 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 4.5% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 31.4% margin vs EFSI's 7.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FUNC's 361.3%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 13.1% ROA vs EFSI's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.74 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.4% margin vs EFSI's 7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs EFSI's 0.4%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.8% |
EFSI vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EFSI vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • FUNC leads 1 • EFSI leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3112.4x CZWI's $90M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EFSI's 7.9%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $105M | $90M | $120M | $135M | $137M | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $9M | $35M | $23M | $58M | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $14M | $25M | $16M | $43M | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $11M | $16M | $11M | $36M | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.6% | +54.7% | +70.3% | +54.3% | +69.7% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +7.0% | +27.2% | +14.1% | +41.4% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +16.0% | +20.5% | +11.5% | +31.4% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +12.4% | +13.1% | +7.9% | +26.4% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.4% | +63.0% | +20.2% | +120.9% | -3.4% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BSVN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 62% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BSVN offers better value at 0.61x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $233M | $207M | $272M | $184M | $446M | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $289M | $140M | $255M | $227M | $202M | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.13x | 14.70x | 11.11x | 14.16x | 10.33x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.00x | 11.79x | 9.66x | 11.03x | 10.46x | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.90x | 0.85x | — | 0.61x | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.13x | 15.69x | 7.85x | 11.90x | 3.48x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.23x | 2.29x | 2.28x | 1.35x | 3.25x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 1.11x | 1.34x | 0.87x | 1.77x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.82x | 19.90x | 17.67x | 17.26x | 10.78x | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $4 for EFSI. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | +7.8% | +12.6% | +7.3% | +18.2% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +2.3% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +2.0% | +7.1% | +5.0% | +18.3% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +0.6% | +9.8% | +6.0% | +5.2% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.28x | 0.56x | 0.32x | — | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $56M | -$67M | -$17M | $43M | -$245M | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $119M | $132M | $26M | $245M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $52M | $115M | $70M | $0 | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.27x | 0.16x | 0.99x | 0.31x | 1.39x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $28,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +24.3% | +14.3% | +26.5% | +13.0% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.1% | +52.1% | +44.4% | +37.2% | +20.3% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.3% | +153.7% | +192.2% | +13.1% | +97.2% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.3% | +69.0% | +141.9% | +18.1% | +189.1% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.4% | +149.0% | +361.3% | +135.4% | +169.2% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +36.4% | +43.0% | +4.2% | +25.4% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNSB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs BSVN's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.50x | 0.67x | 0.60x | 0.64x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.98 | $22.62 | $42.35 | $25.17 | $50.10 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.70 | $12.83 | $28.00 | $17.86 | $37.56 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +94.9% | +98.9% | +99.0% | +92.8% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.6 | 51.2 | 71.6 | 65.3 | 62.6 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 41K | 13K | 45K | 11K | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EFSI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EFSI as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", BSVN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.6% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, EFSI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.64% vs MNSB's 1.60%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | — | $25.00 | — | $57.00 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +1.7% | +2.2% | +1.6% | +2.1% | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 23 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | $0.37 | $0.92 | $0.40 | $0.98 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +0.3% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
BSVN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
EFSI vs CZWI vs FUNC vs MNSB vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFSI or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or BSVN or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 6.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EFSI or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or BSVN or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 61x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EFSI or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or BSVN or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +189. 1%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus KO's +121. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EFSI or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or BSVN or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EFSI or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or BSVN or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 6.
6% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -63. 2% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EFSI or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or BSVN or JPM or KO?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 7. 9% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EFSI or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or BSVN or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 15. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 22. 6% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EFSI or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or BSVN or JPM or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB).
09Is EFSI or CZWI or FUNC or MNSB or BSVN or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, JPM: +465. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EFSI and CZWI and FUNC and MNSB and BSVN and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (EFSI (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and BSVN (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EFSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.